Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ELAB vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
ELAB vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $49K | $12.50B | $2.98B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-1M | $6.05B | $1.24B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $4M | $37M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 41.3% | 34.9% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -75.7% | -0.2% | 9.3% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 99.1x | 46.5x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.93B | $18M | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $1.60B | $341M | $687M |
ELAB vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 66.0 | -34.0% |
| Rush Street Interac… (RSI) | 100 | 662.5 | +562.5% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 68.3 | -31.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELAB vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELAB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 44.1%, EPS growth 86.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.4%
- 44.1% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8%
DKNG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
- 189.9% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 1.07, current ratio 1.93x
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (23.0x vs 99.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.1% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.0x vs 99.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs ELAB's -253.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs ELAB's 4.01 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.2% vs ELAB's -99.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs ELAB's -44.6% |
ELAB vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ELAB vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RSI leads in 4 of 6 categories
ELAB leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • PENN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN and ELAB operate at a comparable scale, with $7.0B and -$1M in trailing revenue. RSI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ELAB's -2.5%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$1M | $6.1B | $1.2B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $266M | $156M | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $4M | $37M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $612M | $147M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +41.3% | +34.9% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -75.7% | -0.2% | +9.3% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +0.1% | +3.0% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +10.1% | +11.8% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.8% | +42.8% | +41.1% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +192.9% | +60.0% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ELAB and PENN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PENN's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49,114 | $12.5B | $3.0B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $12.8B | $2.7B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -3113.58x | 199.21x | -2.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 99.14x | 46.52x | 22.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 49.42x | 20.87x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 2.06x | 2.63x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 19.81x | 21.70x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.31x | 18.15x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RSI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RSI delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-78 for ELAB. RSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs ELAB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.4% | +0.5% | +12.9% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.6% | +0.1% | +6.0% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -82.7% | -0.9% | — | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | -0.6% | +26.3% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.06x | 0.06x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $330M | -$322M | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $1.6B | $341M | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.9B | $18M | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.68x | 1.92x | — | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RSI five years ago would be worth $21,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ELAB. Over the past 12 months, RSI leads with a +138.2% total return vs ELAB's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSI at 105.4% vs ELAB's -98.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.4% | -29.3% | +44.4% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.7% | -27.3% | +138.2% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +4.3% | +766.1% | -35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -47.9% | +113.9% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +157.3% | +189.9% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.7% | +1.4% | +105.4% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
RSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELAB's 4.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSI currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs ELAB's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.01x | 1.12x | 1.07x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1236.48 | $48.78 | $29.24 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.62 | $20.46 | $11.50 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +51.7% | +95.4% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.7 | 55.1 | 69.5 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.4M | 12.9M | 1.7M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DKNG as "Buy", RSI as "Buy", PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.2% upside for DKNG (target: $37) vs 9.0% for RSI (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.88 | $30.40 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 48 | 13 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.6% | +0.3% | +15.8% |
RSI leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
ELAB vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELAB or DKNG or RSI or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PMGC Holdings Inc.
(ELAB) is the stronger pick with 44. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) offers the better valuation at 199. 2x trailing P/E (46. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELAB or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
On forward P/E, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 23. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELAB or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) delivered a total return of +113. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RSI returned +189. 9% versus ELAB's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELAB or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus PMGC Holdings Inc. 's 4. 01β — meaning ELAB is approximately 273% more volatile than RSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELAB or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PMGC Holdings Inc.
(ELAB) is pulling ahead at 44. 1% versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rush Street Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 418. 5% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ELAB leads at 1340% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELAB or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -253. 1% for PMGC Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSI leads at 7. 7% versus -75. 7% for ELAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ELAB leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELAB or DKNG or RSI or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 76. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 46. 2% to $36. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELAB or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ELAB or DKNG or RSI or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), +189. 9% 10Y return). PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB) carries a higher beta of 4. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSI: +189. 9%, ELAB: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELAB and DKNG and RSI and PENN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ELAB (Healthcare) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and RSI (Consumer Cyclical) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ELAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.