ELAB
PMGC Holdings Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$49K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ELAB vs HOFV vs DKNG vs SKLZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HOFV
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company
Entertainment
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-90.4%
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$12.50B
5Y Perf.-33.3%
SKLZ
Skillz Inc.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$109M
5Y Perf.+11.9%
ELAB vs HOFV vs DKNG vs SKLZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ELAB | HOFV | DKNG | SKLZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Entertainment | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $49K | $2M | $12.50B | $109M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-1M | $17M | $6.05B | $104M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-63M | $4M | $-70M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 63.0% | 41.3% | 87.5% |
| Operating Margin | -75.7% | -158.0% | -0.2% | -68.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 104.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $249M | $1.93B | $129M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $432K | $1.60B | $195M |
ELAB vs HOFV vs DKNG vs SKLZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ELAB
HOFV
DKNG
SKLZ
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) | 100 | 111.9 | +11.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELAB vs HOFV vs DKNG vs SKLZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: DKNG leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. PMGC Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. SKLZ also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ELAB
PMGC Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play
ELAB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 44.1%, EPS growth 86.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.4%
- 44.1% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1%
Best for: growth exposure
HOFV
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company
The Lower-Volatility Pick
HOFV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: communication services exposure
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
The Income Pick
DKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.12
- 157.3% 10Y total return vs SKLZ's -96.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.03x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SKLZ
Skillz Inc.
The Momentum Pick
SKLZ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +34.7% vs ELAB's -99.7%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ELAB | 44.1% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1% |
| Quality / Margins | DKNG | 0.1% margin vs HOFV's -366.2% |
| Stability / Safety | DKNG | Beta 1.12 vs ELAB's 4.01 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SKLZ | +34.7% vs ELAB's -99.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DKNG | 0.1% ROA vs ELAB's -44.6%, ROIC -0.9% vs -82.7% |
ELAB vs HOFV vs DKNG vs SKLZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
ELAB vs HOFV vs DKNG vs SKLZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLDKNGLAGGINGSKLZ
Who Leads Where
DKNG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ELAB leads 1 • HOFV leads 0 • SKLZ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓SKLZSkillz Inc.
0leads
HOFVHall of Fame Resort &…
0leads
ELABPMGC Holdings Inc.
1leads
DKNGDraftKings Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ELABvs HOFVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
DKNG4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ELAB2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DKNG6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
DKNG4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKNG and ELAB operate at a comparable scale, with $6.1B and -$1M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.1% (DKNG) to -3.7% (HOFV). On growth, SKLZ holds the edge at +53.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | DKNGDraftKings Inc. | SKLZSkillz Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$1M | $17M | $6.1B | $104M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$10M | $266M | -$70M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$63M | $4M | -$70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$11M | $612M | -$70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +63.0% | +41.3% | +87.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -75.7% | -158.0% | -0.2% | -68.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -3.7% | +0.1% | -67.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -64.5% | +10.1% | -67.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.8% | -33.3% | +42.8% | +53.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -2.0% | +192.9% | -24.7% |
DKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ELAB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | DKNGDraftKings Inc. | SKLZSkillz Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49,114 | $2M | $12.5B | $109M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $251M | $12.8B | $43M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -0.04x | -3113.58x | -1.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 104.42x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 49.42x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.11x | 2.06x | 1.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.03x | 19.81x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.31x | — |
ELAB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKNG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKNG delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOFV. SKLZ carries lower financial leverage with a 1.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOFV's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs HOFV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | DKNGDraftKings Inc. | SKLZSkillz Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.4% | -2.1% | +0.5% | -52.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.6% | -17.6% | +0.1% | -21.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -82.7% | -6.7% | -0.9% | -148.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | -7.9% | -0.6% | -34.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.45x | 3.06x | 1.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $249M | $330M | -$66M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $432,174 | $1.6B | $195M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $249M | $1.9B | $129M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.68x | -1.04x | 1.92x | -7.08x |
DKNG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DKNG five years ago would be worth $5,209 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ELAB. Over the past 12 months, SKLZ leads with a +34.7% total return vs ELAB's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DKNG at 1.4% vs ELAB's -98.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | DKNGDraftKings Inc. | SKLZSkillz Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.4% | 0.0% | -29.3% | +58.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.7% | -50.0% | -27.3% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -95.0% | +4.3% | -42.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.5% | -47.9% | -97.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.8% | +157.3% | -96.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.7% | -63.1% | +1.4% | -16.9% |
DKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOFV and DKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOFV is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELAB's 4.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DKNG currently trades 51.7% from its 52-week high vs ELAB's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | DKNGDraftKings Inc. | SKLZSkillz Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.94x | -0.62x | 1.06x | 2.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1236.48 | $0.90 | $48.78 | $20.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.62 | $0.24 | $20.46 | $2.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +38.9% | +51.7% | +34.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.7 | 43.5 | 55.1 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.4M | 0 | 12.9M | 1.2M |
Evenly matched — HOFV and DKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DKNG as "Buy", SKLZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 931.5% upside for SKLZ (target: $72) vs 45.3% for DKNG (target: $37).
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | DKNGDraftKings Inc. | SKLZSkillz Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $36.64 | $72.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 48 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.6% | +8.5% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
DKNG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ELAB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallDraftKings Inc. (DKNG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ELAB vs HOFV vs DKNG vs SKLZ: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELAB or HOFV or DKNG or SKLZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PMGC Holdings Inc.
(ELAB) is the stronger pick with 44. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ELAB or HOFV or DKNG or SKLZ?
Over the past 5 years, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) delivered a total return of -47. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKNG returned +160. 4% versus ELAB's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ELAB or HOFV or DKNG or SKLZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
62β versus PMGC Holdings Inc. 's 3. 94β — meaning ELAB is approximately -736% more volatile than HOFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 115% versus 3% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ELAB or HOFV or DKNG or SKLZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PMGC Holdings Inc.
(ELAB) is pulling ahead at 44. 1% versus -12. 1% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -67. 0% for Skillz Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ELAB leads at 1340% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ELAB or HOFV or DKNG or SKLZ?
DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -263. 4% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DKNG leads at -0. 3% versus -139. 9% for HOFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKLZ leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ELAB or HOFV or DKNG or SKLZ more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKLZ: 931.
5% to $72. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ELAB or HOFV or DKNG or SKLZ?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ELAB or HOFV or DKNG or SKLZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
62)). PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB) carries a higher beta of 3. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFV: -99. 8%, ELAB: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ELAB and HOFV and DKNG and SKLZ?
These companies operate in different sectors (ELAB (Healthcare) and HOFV (Communication Services) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and SKLZ (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ELAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SKLZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ELAB: -45.8% · HOFV: -33.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.