ELAB
PMGC Holdings Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$45K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ELAB vs HOFV vs GFAI vs AEYE vs GAME
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HOFV
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company
Entertainment
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-90.4%
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited
Security & Protection Services
Market Cap$11M
5Y Perf.-86.6%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$98M
5Y Perf.+84.1%
GAME
GameSquare Holdings, Inc.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$19M
5Y Perf.-66.6%
ELAB vs HOFV vs GFAI vs AEYE vs GAME — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ELAB | HOFV | GFAI | AEYE | GAME |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Entertainment | Security & Protection Services | Software - Application | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $45K | $2M | $11M | $98M | $19M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-1M | $17M | $72M | $40M | $87M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-63M | $-24M | $-3M | $-40M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 63.0% | 15.1% | 78.3% | 15.4% |
| Operating Margin | -75.7% | -158.0% | -27.4% | -7.9% | -50.0% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $249M | $3M | $721K | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $432K | $22M | $5M | $12M |
ELAB vs HOFV vs GFAI vs AEYE vs GAME — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ELAB
HOFV
GFAI
AEYE
GAME
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 13.4 | -86.6% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 184.1 | +84.1% |
| GameSquare Holdings… (GAME) | 100 | 33.4 | -66.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELAB vs HOFV vs GFAI vs AEYE vs GAME
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AEYE leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. GameSquare Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ELAB
PMGC Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play
ELAB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 44.1%, EPS growth 86.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.4%
Best for: growth exposure
HOFV
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company
The Lower-Volatility Pick
HOFV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: communication services exposure
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited
The Defensive Pick
GFAI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 8.1%, current ratio 4.92x
- Beta 2.36, current ratio 4.92x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Income Pick
AEYE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.18
- 96.5% 10Y total return vs GFAI's -99.5%
- -7.6% margin vs HOFV's -366.2%
- Beta 2.18 vs ELAB's 3.94
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
GAME
GameSquare Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Leader
GAME is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 132.9% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1%
- -23.7% vs ELAB's -99.7%
Best for: growth and momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GAME | 132.9% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1% |
| Quality / Margins | AEYE | -7.6% margin vs HOFV's -366.2% |
| Stability / Safety | AEYE | Beta 2.18 vs ELAB's 3.94 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GAME | -23.7% vs ELAB's -99.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AEYE | -9.5% ROA vs GAME's -90.8%, ROIC -42.4% vs -126.4% |
ELAB vs HOFV vs GFAI vs AEYE vs GAME — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FY 2024
ELAB vs HOFV vs GFAI vs AEYE vs GAME — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAEYELAGGINGGAME
Who Leads Where
AEYE leads in 3 of 6 categories
ELAB leads 1 • HOFV leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • GAME leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓GAMEGameSquare Holdings, …
0leads
GFAIGuardforce AI Co., Li…
0leads
HOFVHall of Fame Resort &…
0leads
ELABPMGC Holdings Inc.
1leads
AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ELABvs HOFVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AEYE5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ELAB2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AEYE4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
AEYE1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEYE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAME and ELAB operate at a comparable scale, with $87M and -$1M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -7.6% (AEYE) to -3.7% (HOFV). On growth, AEYE holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GAMEGameSquare Holdin… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$1M | $17M | $72M | $40M | $87M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$10M | -$12M | -$504,000 | -$40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$63M | -$24M | -$3M | -$40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$11M | -$6M | $2M | -$20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +63.0% | +15.1% | +78.3% | +15.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -75.7% | -158.0% | -27.4% | -7.9% | -50.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -3.7% | -32.9% | -7.6% | -46.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -64.5% | -8.8% | +5.5% | -23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.8% | -33.3% | +3.6% | +7.9% | -11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -2.0% | +38.9% | +29.0% | +79.6% |
AEYE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ELAB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GAMEGameSquare Holdin… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45,021 | $2M | $11M | $98M | $19M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $251M | -$8M | $93M | $30M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -0.04x | -0.96x | -31.44x | -0.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.11x | 0.31x | 2.42x | 0.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.03x | 0.18x | 20.31x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
ELAB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HOFV and GFAI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEYE delivers a -47.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-48 in annual profit, vs $-3 for GAME. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOFV's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs HOFV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GAMEGameSquare Holdin… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.4% | -2.1% | -69.7% | -47.8% | -3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.6% | -17.6% | -50.2% | -9.5% | -90.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -82.7% | -6.7% | -41.6% | -42.4% | -126.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | -7.9% | -19.1% | -17.7% | -175.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.45x | 0.08x | 0.15x | 1.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $249M | -$19M | -$5M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $432,174 | $22M | $5M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $249M | $3M | $721,000 | $24M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.68x | -1.04x | -167.24x | -2.79x | -466.47x |
Evenly matched — HOFV and GFAI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEYE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEYE five years ago would be worth $4,233 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ELAB. Over the past 12 months, GAME leads with a -23.7% total return vs ELAB's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEYE at 5.4% vs ELAB's -98.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GAMEGameSquare Holdin… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.5% | 0.0% | -20.6% | -21.0% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.7% | -58.4% | -51.1% | -34.1% | -23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -95.0% | -93.3% | +17.1% | -88.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.5% | -99.5% | -57.7% | -98.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.8% | -99.5% | +96.5% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.7% | -63.1% | -59.4% | +5.4% | -51.7% |
AEYE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOFV and AEYE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOFV is the less volatile stock with a -0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELAB's 3.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEYE currently trades 48.0% from its 52-week high vs ELAB's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GAMEGameSquare Holdin… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.94x | -0.62x | 2.36x | 2.18x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1236.48 | $0.90 | $1.50 | $16.39 | $2.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.62 | $0.24 | $0.38 | $5.31 | $0.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +38.9% | +33.9% | +48.0% | +16.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.0 | 43.5 | 43.8 | 66.5 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.4M | 0 | 315K | 195K | 9.0M |
Evenly matched — HOFV and AEYE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
AEYE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GAMEGameSquare Holdin… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AEYE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
AEYE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ELAB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallAudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ELAB vs HOFV vs GFAI vs AEYE vs GAME: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELAB or HOFV or GFAI or AEYE or GAME a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GameSquare Holdings, Inc.
(GAME) is the stronger pick with 132. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ELAB or HOFV or GFAI or AEYE or GAME?
Over the past 5 years, AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) delivered a total return of -57. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +96. 5% versus ELAB's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ELAB or HOFV or GFAI or AEYE or GAME?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
62β versus PMGC Holdings Inc. 's 3. 94β — meaning ELAB is approximately -736% more volatile than HOFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 3% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ELAB or HOFV or GFAI or AEYE or GAME?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GameSquare Holdings, Inc.
(GAME) is pulling ahead at 132. 9% versus -12. 1% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to 27. 2% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ELAB leads at 1340% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ELAB or HOFV or GFAI or AEYE or GAME?
AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) is the more profitable company, earning -7. 6% net margin versus -263. 4% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — meaning it keeps -7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEYE leads at -7. 9% versus -139. 9% for HOFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ELAB or HOFV or GFAI or AEYE or GAME?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ELAB or HOFV or GFAI or AEYE or GAME better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
62)). PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB) carries a higher beta of 3. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFV: -99. 8%, ELAB: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ELAB and HOFV and GFAI and AEYE and GAME?
These companies operate in different sectors (ELAB (Healthcare) and HOFV (Communication Services) and GFAI (Industrials) and AEYE (Technology) and GAME (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ELAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GAME is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ELAB: -45.8% · HOFV: -33.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.