REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ELS vs ABNB vs TRIP vs WH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Lodging
ELS vs ABNB vs TRIP vs WH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $12.27B | $84.21B | $1.31B | $6.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.53B | $12.65B | $1.88B | $1.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $387M | $2.52B | $19M | $193M |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 82.9% | 66.2% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 33.8% | 20.5% | 3.7% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 31.1x | 28.3x | 7.7x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $3.37B | $2.07B | $1.24B | $3.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $6.56B | $1.03B | $64M |
ELS vs ABNB vs TRIP vs WH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity LifeStyle Pr… (ELS) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
| Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| Wyndham Hotels & Re… (WH) | 100 | 141.0 | +41.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELS vs ABNB vs TRIP vs WH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 3.2%
- 106.7% 10Y total return vs WH's 43.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 0.02, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.68x
ABNB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth -1.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.4%
- 10.3% revenue growth vs WH's 1.5%
- +14.1% vs TRIP's -21.8%
- 10.2% ROA vs TRIP's 0.7%, ROIC 50.6% vs 7.4%
TRIP is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 17.4x)
WH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs WH's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 17.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.2% margin vs TRIP's 1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs TRIP's 1.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WH's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.1% vs TRIP's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs TRIP's 0.7%, ROIC 50.6% vs 7.4% |
ELS vs ABNB vs TRIP vs WH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ELS vs ABNB vs TRIP vs WH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRIP leads in 1 of 6 categories
ABNB leads 1 • WH leads 1 • ELS leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ELS and ABNB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABNB is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 8.8x WH's $1.4B. ELS is the more profitable business, keeping 25.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRIP's 1.0%. On growth, ELS holds the edge at +22.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $12.6B | $1.9B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $727M | $2.6B | $166M | $478M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $387M | $2.5B | $19M | $193M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $334M | $4.5B | $198M | $304M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +82.9% | +66.2% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +20.5% | +3.7% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +19.9% | +1.0% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +36.0% | +10.5% | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.4% | +17.9% | -3.9% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.3% | +4.0% | -2.6% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TRIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 32.8x trailing earnings, ELS trades at a 9% valuation discount to TRIP's 36.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRIP's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 31.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.3B | $84.2B | $1.3B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.6B | $79.7B | $1.5B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.79x | 34.85x | 36.23x | 33.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.11x | 28.35x | 7.66x | 17.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.17x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.48x | 31.33x | 8.77x | 19.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.01x | 6.88x | 0.69x | 4.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.98x | 10.67x | 2.28x | 13.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.74x | 18.12x | 8.02x | 19.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WH delivers a 37.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $3 for TRIP. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WH's 6.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ELS scores 6/9 vs WH's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.3% | +31.2% | +2.9% | +37.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +10.2% | +0.7% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +50.6% | +7.4% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +26.3% | +4.5% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 0.25x | 1.92x | 6.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.3B | -$4.5B | $202M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $6.6B | $1.0B | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $2.1B | $1.2B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.98x | — | 4.17x | 3.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WH five years ago would be worth $12,182 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,542 for TRIP. Over the past 12 months, ABNB leads with a +14.1% total return vs TRIP's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WH at 9.4% vs TRIP's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.8% | +5.6% | -23.3% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.6% | +14.1% | -21.8% | +2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.2% | +11.8% | -30.5% | +30.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | -7.1% | -74.6% | +21.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.7% | -2.9% | -76.7% | +43.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.1% | +3.8% | -11.4% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ELS and ABNB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ELS is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRIP's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs TRIP's 55.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 1.33x | 1.90x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.00 | $147.25 | $20.16 | $92.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.15 | $110.81 | $9.01 | $69.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +95.4% | +55.7% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 56.2 | 52.5 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 3.5M | 3.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
ELS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ELS as "Buy", ABNB as "Hold", TRIP as "Hold", WH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for TRIP (target: $14) vs 3.5% for ABNB (target: $145). For income investors, ELS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.20% vs WH's 2.00%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.57 | $145.44 | $13.56 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 44 | 56 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | — | — | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | — | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.02 | — | — | $1.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.5% | +39.9% | +4.6% |
TRIP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ABNB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ELS vs ABNB vs TRIP vs WH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELS or ABNB or TRIP or WH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is the stronger pick with 10. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS) offers the better valuation at 32. 8x trailing P/E (31. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELS or ABNB or TRIP or WH?
On trailing P/E, Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
(ELS) is the cheapest at 32. 8x versus Tripadvisor, Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Tripadvisor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELS or ABNB or TRIP or WH?
Over the past 5 years, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) delivered a total return of +21. 8%, compared to -74. 6% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ELS returned +106. 7% versus TRIP's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELS or ABNB or TRIP or WH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
(ELS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Tripadvisor, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning TRIP is approximately 9004% more volatile than ELS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 7% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELS or ABNB or TRIP or WH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is pulling ahead at 10. 3% versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tripadvisor, Inc. grew EPS 798. 6% year-over-year, compared to -31. 6% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABNB leads at 13. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELS or ABNB or TRIP or WH?
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
(ELS) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 2% net margin versus 2. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ELS leads at 33. 8% versus 4. 2% for TRIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABNB leads at 83. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELS or ABNB or TRIP or WH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tripadvisor, Inc.
(TRIP) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 31. 1x for Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. — 23. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRIP: 20. 7% to $13. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELS or ABNB or TRIP or WH?
In this comparison, ELS (3.
2% yield), WH (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. ABNB, TRIP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ELS or ABNB or TRIP or WH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
(ELS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02), 3. 2% yield, +106. 7% 10Y return). Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELS: +106. 7%, TRIP: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELS and ABNB and TRIP and WH?
These companies operate in different sectors (ELS (Real Estate) and ABNB (Consumer Cyclical) and TRIP (Consumer Cyclical) and WH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ELS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TRIP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ELS, WH pay a dividend while ABNB, TRIP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.