Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ELUT vs XTNT vs NVCR vs LMAT vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
ELUT vs XTNT vs NVCR vs LMAT vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $45M | $80M | $1.92B | $2.46B | $99.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $133M | $674M | $256M | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $53M | $2M | $-173M | $62M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 62.0% | 75.2% | 72.4% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -149.8% | 4.8% | -27.2% | 28.5% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | — | — | 37.2x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $35M | $290M | $186M | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $6M | $103M | $28M | $2.22B |
ELUT vs XTNT vs NVCR vs LMAT vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elutia Inc. (ELUT) | 100 | 9.1 | -90.9% |
| Xtant Medical Holdi… (XTNT) | 100 | 49.1 | -50.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 13.8 | -86.2% |
| LeMaitre Vascular, … (LMAT) | 100 | 332.2 | +232.2% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 77.5 | -22.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELUT vs XTNT vs NVCR vs LMAT vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELUT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 434.2% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
XTNT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 107.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.5%
- 28.4% revenue growth vs ELUT's -49.6%
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LMAT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs MDT's 26.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 47.2%, current ratio 12.89x
- PEG 1.92 vs MDT's 36.00
- Beta 0.57, yield 0.7%, current ratio 12.89x
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
- 3.6% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs LMAT's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 175.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs -16.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% revenue growth vs ELUT's -49.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 434.2% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs LMAT's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.3% vs ELUT's -48.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs -16.4% |
ELUT vs XTNT vs NVCR vs LMAT vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ELUT vs XTNT vs NVCR vs LMAT vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDT leads in 2 of 6 categories
LMAT leads 1 • ELUT leads 0 • XTNT leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ELUT and LMAT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 2886.5x ELUT's $12M. ELUT is the more profitable business, keeping 4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, XTNT holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $133M | $674M | $256M | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | $11M | -$165M | $81M | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $53M | $2M | -$173M | $62M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $5M | -$48M | $79M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +62.0% | +75.2% | +72.4% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -149.8% | +4.8% | -27.2% | +28.5% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +1.3% | -25.7% | +24.3% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | +3.9% | -7.1% | +30.9% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -160.8% | +19.0% | +12.3% | +11.2% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +123.7% | -100.0% | +41.7% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MDT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.8x trailing earnings, ELUT trades at a 98% valuation discount to LMAT's 42.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LMAT offers better value at 2.21x vs MDT's 36.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $80M | $1.9B | $2.5B | $99.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $109M | $2.1B | $2.6B | $126.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.77x | -4.75x | -13.80x | 42.82x | 21.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 37.17x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.21x | 36.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 33.39x | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.70x | 0.68x | 2.92x | 9.85x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.66x | 1.77x | 5.51x | 6.29x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 33.01x | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ELUT and LMAT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ELUT delivers a 192.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $193 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ELUT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LMAT scores 7/9 vs XTNT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +192.9% | +3.8% | -50.8% | +16.2% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +129.5% | +1.8% | -16.5% | +10.3% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -12.8% | -16.4% | +9.7% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -103.6% | -17.9% | -28.9% | +12.3% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.82x | 0.85x | 0.47x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | $29M | $187M | $157M | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $6M | $103M | $28M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $35M | $290M | $186M | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.55x | -96.80x | 24.99x | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LMAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LMAT five years ago would be worth $21,818 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $863 for ELUT. Over the past 12 months, LMAT leads with a +33.3% total return vs ELUT's -48.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LMAT at 18.2% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.3% | -24.0% | +28.3% | +34.9% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.0% | +10.0% | +1.1% | +33.3% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.2% | -12.3% | -75.7% | +65.2% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.4% | -66.1% | -91.3% | +118.2% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | -97.8% | +30.3% | +608.6% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.1% | -4.3% | -37.6% | +18.2% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ELUT and LMAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ELUT is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LMAT currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs ELUT's 37.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.11x | 0.69x | 2.20x | 0.57x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.64 | $0.95 | $20.06 | $118.12 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $0.44 | $9.82 | $78.35 | $77.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.8% | +60.0% | +83.9% | +91.4% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 60.9 | 69.8 | 48.3 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 121K | 142K | 1.5M | 244K | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVCR as "Buy", LMAT as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs -5.9% for LMAT (target: $102). For income investors, MDT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.57% vs LMAT's 0.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $33.50 | $101.50 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 15 | 20 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.7% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 15 | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.79 | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
MDT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). LMAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ELUT vs XTNT vs NVCR vs LMAT vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELUT or XTNT or NVCR or LMAT or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 6% for Elutia Inc. (ELUT). Elutia Inc. (ELUT) offers the better valuation at 0. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELUT or XTNT or NVCR or LMAT or MDT?
On trailing P/E, Elutia Inc.
(ELUT) is the cheapest at 0. 8x versus LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. at 42. 8x. On forward P/E, Medtronic plc is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. wins at 1. 92x versus Medtronic plc's 36. 00x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELUT or XTNT or NVCR or LMAT or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
(LMAT) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -91. 4% for Elutia Inc. (ELUT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LMAT returned +608. 6% versus XTNT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELUT or XTNT or NVCR or LMAT or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Elutia Inc.
(ELUT) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately -2170% more volatile than ELUT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Elutia Inc. (ELUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELUT or XTNT or NVCR or LMAT or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus -49. 6% for Elutia Inc. (ELUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Elutia Inc. grew EPS 169. 4% year-over-year, compared to 21. 8% for NovoCure Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, XTNT leads at 28. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELUT or XTNT or NVCR or LMAT or MDT?
Elutia Inc.
(ELUT) is the more profitable company, earning 434. 2% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 434. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LMAT leads at 27. 2% versus -149. 8% for ELUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELUT or XTNT or NVCR or LMAT or MDT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 92x versus Medtronic plc's 36. 00x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Medtronic plc (MDT) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 37. 2x for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. — 23. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELUT or XTNT or NVCR or LMAT or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield), LMAT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. ELUT, XTNT, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ELUT or XTNT or NVCR or LMAT or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
(LMAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 0. 7% yield, +608. 6% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMAT: +608. 6%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELUT and XTNT and NVCR and LMAT and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ELUT is a small-cap deep-value stock; XTNT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. LMAT, MDT pay a dividend while ELUT, XTNT, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.