Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ELVA vs NRGV vs MVST vs STEM vs PLUG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Software - Infrastructure
Electrical Equipment & Parts
ELVA vs NRGV vs MVST vs STEM vs PLUG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Software - Infrastructure | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $483M | $716M | $611M | $74M | $4.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $64M | $217M | $428M | $153M | $710M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-115M | $-29M | $144M | $-1.63B |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 22.1% | 28.6% | 36.3% | 99.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | -35.8% | 1.6% | -35.1% | 38.1% |
| Forward P/E | 72.6x | — | 31.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $23M | $95M | $186M | $369M | $997M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $58M | $105M | $49M | $1M |
ELVA vs NRGV vs MVST vs STEM vs PLUG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) | 100 | 138.7 | +38.7% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 42.7 | -57.3% |
| Microvast Holdings,… (MVST) | 100 | 15.4 | -84.6% |
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 8.7 | -91.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELVA vs NRGV vs MVST vs STEM vs PLUG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELVA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.11
- Rev growth 42.6%, EPS growth 286.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 59.7%
- 95.6% 10Y total return vs NRGV's -57.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.11, Low D/E 72.5%, current ratio 4.16x
NRGV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.
- 340.9% revenue growth vs STEM's 8.1%
- +447.1% vs STEM's -16.2%
MVST is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
STEM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 94.2% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
- 43.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC -57.1% vs 10.9%
Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs STEM's 8.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.2% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.11 vs STEM's 3.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs STEM's -16.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 43.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC -57.1% vs 10.9% |
ELVA vs NRGV vs MVST vs STEM vs PLUG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ELVA vs NRGV vs MVST vs STEM vs PLUG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ELVA leads in 3 of 6 categories
MVST leads 1 • NRGV leads 0 • STEM leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MVST and PLUG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLUG is the larger business by revenue, generating $710M annually — 11.2x ELVA's $64M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $64M | $217M | $428M | $153M | $710M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | -$72M | $32M | -$16M | -$1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$115M | -$29M | $144M | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$98M | $56M | -$8M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +22.1% | +28.6% | +36.3% | +99.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | -35.8% | +1.6% | -35.1% | +38.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | -53.0% | -6.8% | +94.2% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | -45.2% | +13.1% | -5.5% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.3% | +156.4% | -15.0% | -10.8% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -42.9% | +119.2% | +27.2% | +95.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MVST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ELVA's 70.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MVST's 99.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $483M | $716M | $611M | $74M | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $499M | $752M | $692M | $394M | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 119.85x | -6.37x | -21.00x | -0.95x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 72.61x | — | 31.50x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 10.23x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 70.64x | — | 99.04x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.60x | 3.52x | 1.43x | 0.48x | 6.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.00x | 7.50x | 1.49x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.89x | 10.82x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ELVA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ELVA delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. MVST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STEM scores 6/9 vs NRGV's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | -146.8% | -7.4% | — | -124.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | -40.3% | -2.9% | +43.2% | -64.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | -49.5% | +0.9% | -57.1% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.1% | -53.7% | +1.2% | -23.9% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 1.07x | 0.45x | — | 19.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16M | $36M | $81M | $320M | $996M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $58M | $105M | $49M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $95M | $186M | $369M | $997M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.41x | -10.33x | -16.53x | 14.43x | -36.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ELVA five years ago would be worth $15,902 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $217 for STEM. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs STEM's -16.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELVA at 38.9% vs STEM's -52.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.5% | -15.3% | -33.0% | -48.6% | +40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +259.6% | +447.1% | -2.1% | -16.2% | +303.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.9% | +140.7% | +58.8% | -89.5% | -66.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | -57.7% | -84.4% | -97.8% | -86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.6% | -57.1% | -80.7% | -95.5% | +62.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.9% | +34.0% | +16.7% | -52.9% | -30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ELVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ELVA is the less volatile stock with a 2.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ELVA currently trades 82.3% from its 52-week high vs MVST's 26.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 3.08x | 2.45x | 3.66x | 2.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.88 | $6.35 | $7.12 | $32.23 | $4.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.66 | $0.65 | $1.37 | $5.93 | $0.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.3% | +65.2% | +26.5% | +27.0% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.3 | 53.3 | 54.4 | 51.2 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 340K | 3.7M | 3.9M | 155K | 76.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ELVA as "Buy", NRGV as "Buy", MVST as "Buy", STEM as "Hold", PLUG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 154.0% upside for MVST (target: $5) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.17 | $2.75 | $4.80 | $20.67 | $3.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 7 | 6 | 17 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ELVA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MVST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ELVA vs NRGV vs MVST vs STEM vs PLUG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELVA or NRGV or MVST or STEM or PLUG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 1% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) offers the better valuation at 119. 9x trailing P/E (72. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELVA or NRGV or MVST or STEM or PLUG?
On forward P/E, Microvast Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 31. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELVA or NRGV or MVST or STEM or PLUG?
Over the past 5 years, Electrovaya Inc.
(ELVA) delivered a total return of +59. 0%, compared to -97. 8% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ELVA returned +95. 6% versus STEM's -95. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELVA or NRGV or MVST or STEM or PLUG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electrovaya Inc.
(ELVA) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 11β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning STEM is approximately 74% more volatile than ELVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELVA or NRGV or MVST or STEM or PLUG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus 8. 1% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Electrovaya Inc. grew EPS 286. 7% year-over-year, compared to 28. 6% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ELVA leads at 59. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELVA or NRGV or MVST or STEM or PLUG?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -38. 7% for STEM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELVA or NRGV or MVST or STEM or PLUG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) trades at 31. 5x forward P/E versus 72. 6x for Electrovaya Inc. — 41. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVST: 154. 0% to $4. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELVA or NRGV or MVST or STEM or PLUG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ELVA or NRGV or MVST or STEM or PLUG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Electrovaya Inc.
(ELVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Stem, Inc. (STEM) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELVA: +95. 6%, STEM: -95. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELVA and NRGV and MVST and STEM and PLUG?
These companies operate in different sectors (ELVA (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities) and MVST (Industrials) and STEM (Technology) and PLUG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ELVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.