Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Solar
Electrical Equipment & Parts
ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Industrial - Machinery | Solar | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $4.67B | $9.93B | $3.24B | $4.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.40B | $4.26B | $3.17B | $710M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $135M | $40M | $568M | $-1.63B |
| Gross Margin | 44.2% | 32.6% | 23.5% | 99.8% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 8.5% | -1.8% | 38.1% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 16.4x | 22.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.24B | $3.74B | $14.89B | $997M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $474M | $366M | $1.24B | $1M |
ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 61.0 | -39.0% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.4 | +428.4% |
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ENPH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- 4.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs 10.9%
GTLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.4%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.56 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage
RUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 45.1% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5%
- 17.9% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
PLUG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +303.6% vs ENPH's -18.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +303.6% vs ENPH's -18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs 10.9% |
ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RUN leads in 2 of 6 categories
GTLS leads 2 • ENPH leads 1 • PLUG leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 6.0x PLUG's $710M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, RUN holds the edge at +43.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $4.3B | $3.2B | $710M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $171M | $644M | $541M | -$1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $135M | $40M | $568M | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $145M | $203M | -$326M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +32.6% | +23.5% | +99.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +8.5% | -1.8% | +38.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +0.9% | +17.9% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +4.8% | -10.3% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.6% | -2.5% | +43.2% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -127.3% | -36.1% | +2.1% | +95.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 99% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GTLS's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $9.9B | $3.2B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.4B | $13.3B | $16.9B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.50x | 628.45x | 8.07x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.61x | 16.40x | 22.75x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.36x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.19x | 14.33x | 24.31x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.17x | 2.33x | 1.09x | 6.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.40x | 2.79x | 0.75x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 48.75x | 48.95x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. GTLS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENPH scores 6/9 vs PLUG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +1.2% | +12.4% | -124.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +0.4% | +2.5% | -64.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +7.4% | -0.5% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +8.6% | -0.6% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.14x | 1.11x | 2.99x | 19.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $769M | $3.4B | $13.6B | $996M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $474M | $366M | $1.2B | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $3.7B | $14.9B | $997M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 47.60x | 1.08x | -0.02x | -36.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $12,951 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,358 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, PLUG leads with a +303.6% total return vs ENPH's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.6% vs ENPH's -39.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | +0.6% | -29.0% | +40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.9% | +37.6% | +86.7% | +303.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.3% | +62.7% | -19.7% | -66.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.2% | +29.5% | -69.8% | -86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1737.8% | +772.5% | +86.7% | +62.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.9% | +17.6% | -7.1% | -30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs RUN's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 0.56x | 2.89x | 2.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.43 | $208.51 | $22.44 | $4.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.78 | $140.50 | $5.38 | $0.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.2% | +99.5% | +61.5% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 51.2 | 49.0 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.9M | 1.6M | 10.4M | 76.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ENPH as "Hold", GTLS as "Buy", RUN as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for RUN (target: $18) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). GTLS is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.48 | $193.81 | $18.14 | $3.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 55 | 37 | 36 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RUN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GTLS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG?
On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG?
Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to -86. 4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1738% versus PLUG's +62. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 419% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 111% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -4. 3% for RUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Sunrun Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RUN: 31. 4% to $18. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG?
In this comparison, GTLS (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ENPH, RUN, PLUG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, PLUG: +62. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ENPH and GTLS and RUN and PLUG?
These companies operate in different sectors (ENPH (Energy) and GTLS (Industrials) and RUN (Energy) and PLUG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.