EPC vs CHD vs PG vs CL

For growth investors, Church & Dwight Co.

, Inc. (CHD) is the stronger pick with 1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for Edgewell Personal Care Company (EPC). The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) offers the better valuation at 22. 4x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the cheapest at 22.

4x versus Edgewell Personal Care Company at 40. 8x. On forward P/E, Edgewell Personal Care Company is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) delivered a total return of +22.

4%, compared to -43. 5% for Edgewell Personal Care Company (EPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PG returned +119. 3% versus EPC's -68. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

00β versus Edgewell Personal Care Company's 0. 79β — meaning EPC is approximately -18107% more volatile than CL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 22% for Colgate-Palmolive Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Church & Dwight Co.

, Inc. (CHD) is pulling ahead at 1. 6% versus -1. 3% for Edgewell Personal Care Company (EPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -73. 1% for Edgewell Personal Care Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHD leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

0% net margin versus 1. 1% for Edgewell Personal Care Company — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PG leads at 24. 3% versus 4. 3% for EPC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CL leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Edgewell Personal Care Company (EPC) trades at 11.

4x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PG: 10. 8% to $161. 88.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Edgewell Personal Care Company (EPC) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 3% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

00), 2. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CL: +47. 0%, EPC: -68. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.