Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EPWK vs FVRR vs UPWK vs TASK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EPWK
EPWK Holdings Ltd.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$502K
5Y Perf.-99.6%
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • IL
Market Cap$422M
5Y Perf.-59.7%
UPWK
Upwork Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.-15.8%
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$573M
5Y Perf.-24.7%

EPWK vs FVRR vs UPWK vs TASK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EPWK logoEPWK
FVRR logoFVRR
UPWK logoUPWK
TASK logoTASK
IndustryStaffing & Employment ServicesInternet Content & InformationStaffing & Employment ServicesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$502K$422M$1.38B$573M
Revenue (TTM)$37M$429M$595M$1.21B
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$29M$109M$105M
Gross Margin17.6%81.3%103.0%35.5%
Operating Margin-8.8%2.9%20.7%11.6%
Forward P/E5.7x7.4x4.6x
Total Debt$6M$5M$381M$298M
Cash & Equiv.$228K$129M$298M$212M

EPWK vs FVRR vs UPWK vs TASKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EPWK
FVRR
UPWK
TASK
StockFeb 25Mar 26Return
EPWK Holdings Ltd. (EPWK)1000.4-99.6%
Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR)10040.3-59.7%
Upwork Inc. (UPWK)10084.2-15.8%
TaskUs, Inc. (TASK)10075.3-24.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EPWK vs FVRR vs UPWK vs TASK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TASK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Fiverr International Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. UPWK also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EPWK
EPWK Holdings Ltd.
The Secondary Option

EPWK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
The Income Pick

FVRR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 0.97
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
  • Beta 0.97, current ratio 1.94x
  • Beta 0.97 vs EPWK's 2.00
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
UPWK
Upwork Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

UPWK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -49.9% 10Y total return vs TASK's -67.8%
  • 18.3% margin vs EPWK's -5.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.
The Growth Play

TASK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
  • 19.0% revenue growth vs EPWK's 2.1%
  • Lower P/E (4.6x vs 7.4x)
  • -28.3% vs EPWK's -99.7%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTASK logoTASK19.0% revenue growth vs EPWK's 2.1%
ValueTASK logoTASKLower P/E (4.6x vs 7.4x)
Quality / MarginsUPWK logoUPWK18.3% margin vs EPWK's -5.8%
Stability / SafetyFVRR logoFVRRBeta 0.97 vs EPWK's 2.00
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TASK logoTASK-28.3% vs EPWK's -99.7%
Efficiency (ROA)TASK logoTASK10.3% ROA vs EPWK's -45.7%

EPWK vs FVRR vs UPWK vs TASK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

FVRRFiverr International Ltd.
FY 2025
Marketplace Revenue
69.0%$297M
Services Revenue
31.0%$133M
UPWKUpwork Inc.
FY 2025
Enterprise
86.7%$683M
Marketplace
13.3%$105M
TASKTaskUs, Inc.
FY 2025
Digital Customer Experience
75.5%$662M
AI Services
24.5%$214M

EPWK vs FVRR vs UPWK vs TASK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUPWKLAGGINGFVRR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TASK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 32.6x EPWK's $37M. UPWK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EPWK's -5.8%. On growth, TASK holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$37M$429M$595M$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M$26M$150M$204M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M$29M$109M$105M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$103M$224M$88M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+17.6%+81.3%+103.0%+35.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-8.8%+2.9%+20.7%+11.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.8%+6.7%+18.3%+8.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.0%+24.1%+37.7%+7.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-27.5%-1.6%-100.0%+10.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.3%+9.7%+29.6%+13.0%
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TASK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 72% valuation discount to FVRR's 21.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TASK's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FVRR's 22.1x.

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$501,713$422M$1.4B$573M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$299M$1.5B$660M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.30x20.98x12.78x5.79x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.68x7.37x4.58x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.11x9.66x3.26x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.02x0.98x1.76x0.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.06x2.35x0.99x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.06x5.71x7.78x
TASK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — FVRR and TASK each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TASK delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $7 for FVRR. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPWK's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs EPWK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.0%+17.9%+21.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-45.7%+3.1%+8.5%+10.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.2%+14.3%+16.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.3%+16.2%+16.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92867
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.60x0.50x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6M-$124M$83M$86M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$227,826$129M$298M$212M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$5M$381M$298M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-6.50x146.13x7.12x
Evenly matched — FVRR and TASK each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UPWK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TASK five years ago would be worth $3,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38 for EPWK. Over the past 12 months, TASK leads with a -28.3% total return vs EPWK's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPWK at 9.7% vs EPWK's -84.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6750.0%-40.3%-46.5%-12.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.7%-59.7%-34.8%-28.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-58.1%+32.0%-18.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-93.5%-74.8%-67.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-70.6%-49.9%-67.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-84.4%-25.2%+9.7%-6.4%
UPWK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FVRR and UPWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EPWK's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UPWK currently trades 46.5% from its 52-week high vs EPWK's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.00x0.97x1.16x1.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$510.40$34.13$22.84$18.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$9.67$10.02$5.89
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.1%+34.4%+46.5%+34.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.452.935.042.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded161K924K3.4M736K
Evenly matched — FVRR and UPWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: FVRR as "Hold", UPWK as "Buy", TASK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs 43.2% for FVRR (target: $17).

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.83$23.14$13.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts172311
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+7.7%+9.8%+4.8%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

UPWK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TASK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallUpwork Inc. (UPWK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EPWK vs FVRR vs UPWK vs TASK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EPWK or FVRR or UPWK or TASK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for EPWK Holdings Ltd. (EPWK). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upwork Inc. (UPWK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EPWK or FVRR or UPWK or TASK?

On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Fiverr International Ltd. at 21. 0x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EPWK or FVRR or UPWK or TASK?

Over the past 5 years, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) delivered a total return of -67. 8%, compared to -99. 6% for EPWK Holdings Ltd. (EPWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UPWK returned -49. 9% versus EPWK's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EPWK or FVRR or UPWK or TASK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fiverr International Ltd.

(FVRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus EPWK Holdings Ltd. 's 2. 00β — meaning EPWK is approximately 106% more volatile than FVRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 60% for Upwork Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EPWK or FVRR or UPWK or TASK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 2. 1% for EPWK Holdings Ltd. (EPWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPWK leads at 21. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EPWK or FVRR or UPWK or TASK?

Upwork Inc.

(UPWK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus -6. 0% for EPWK Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -8. 4% for EPWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FVRR leads at 80. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EPWK or FVRR or UPWK or TASK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 7. 4x for Upwork Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EPWK or FVRR or UPWK or TASK?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is EPWK or FVRR or UPWK or TASK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fiverr International Ltd.

(FVRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). EPWK Holdings Ltd. (EPWK) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FVRR: -70. 6%, EPWK: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EPWK and FVRR and UPWK and TASK?

These companies operate in different sectors (EPWK (Industrials) and FVRR (Communication Services) and UPWK (Industrials) and TASK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EPWK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EPWK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FVRR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UPWK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TASK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EPWK and FVRR and UPWK and TASK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EPWK: -27.5% · FVRR: -1.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.