ERIE vs HIG

For growth investors, Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the stronger pick with 7.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG). The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

(HIG) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Erie Indemnity Company at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. wins at 0. 44x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

(HIG) delivered a total return of +112. 7%, compared to +14. 8% for Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIG returned +233. 5% versus ERIE's +171. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

16β versus The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 0. 29β — meaning HIG is approximately 79% more volatile than ERIE relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is pulling ahead at 7.

2% versus 7. 1% for The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. grew EPS 28. 7% year-over-year, compared to -7. 5% for Erie Indemnity Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ERIE leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

8% net margin versus 13. 6% for The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ERIE leads at 17. 7% versus 16. 8% for HIG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIG leads at 46. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 6% for The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

16), 2. 2% yield, +171. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ERIE: +171. 6%, HIG: +233. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HIG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.