Waste Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Renewable Utilities
Waste Management
Waste Management
ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Financial - Capital Markets | Renewable Utilities | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $21M | $19M | $716M | $5.35B | $17M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $60M | $217M | $1.88B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-633K | $-2M | $-115M | $7M | $-23M |
| Gross Margin | 93.0% | 79.7% | 22.1% | 17.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.7% | -19.2% | -35.8% | 4.5% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 63.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $6M | $68M | $95M | $1.24B | $592K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $635K | $9M | $58M | $124M | $11M |
ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESGL Holdings Limit… (ESGL) | 100 | 205.9 | +105.9% |
| Greenidge Generatio… (GREE) | 100 | 23.6 | -76.4% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 103.4 | +3.4% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 100.7 | +0.7% |
| Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESGL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, GREE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NRGV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4%
- +447.1% vs AQMS's -51.5%
CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs NRGV's -57.1%
- Beta 0.32, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.32 vs GREE's 3.33
AQMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.26, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.03x
- 1.2% margin vs NRGV's -53.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs NRGV's -53.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs GREE's 3.33 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs AQMS's -51.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs AQMS's -157.5%, ROIC 2.6% vs -166.7% |
ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CWST leads in 2 of 6 categories
ESGL leads 1 • NRGV leads 1 • GREE leads 0 • AQMS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST and AQMS operate at a comparable scale, with $1.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. CWST is the more profitable business, keeping 0.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRGV's -53.0%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $60M | $217M | $1.9B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $4M | -$72M | $414M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$2M | -$115M | $7M | -$23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$20M | -$98M | $102M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.0% | +79.7% | +22.1% | +17.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | -19.2% | -35.8% | +4.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | -33.2% | -53.0% | +0.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -84.1% | -37.7% | -45.2% | +5.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +156.4% | +9.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +2.3% | -42.9% | -18.6% | +71.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ESGL leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ESGL's 13.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GREE's 38.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $19M | $716M | $5.4B | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $79M | $752M | $6.5B | $7M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.57x | -0.65x | -6.37x | 712.08x | -0.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 63.93x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.94x | 38.86x | — | 15.74x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.49x | 0.32x | 3.52x | 2.91x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | — | 7.50x | 3.46x | 0.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 63.17x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CWST delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AQMS. AQMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRGV's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESGL scores 5/9 vs AQMS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.6% | — | -146.8% | +0.5% | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | -3.2% | -40.3% | +0.2% | -157.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.2% | -57.2% | -49.5% | +2.6% | -166.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.7% | -23.9% | -53.7% | +2.9% | -139.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | — | 1.07x | 0.79x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $59M | $36M | $1.1B | -$10M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $634,882 | $9M | $58M | $124M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $68M | $95M | $1.2B | $592,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.14x | 0.70x | -10.33x | 1.12x | -32.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRGV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWST five years ago would be worth $12,572 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $82 for GREE. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs AQMS's -51.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.0% vs AQMS's -71.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.8% | -25.6% | -15.3% | -13.4% | -3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.5% | +29.0% | +447.1% | -28.9% | -51.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | -71.0% | +140.7% | -6.3% | -97.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | -99.2% | -57.7% | +25.7% | -99.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.4% | -62.9% | -57.1% | +1059.4% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.9% | -33.8% | +34.0% | -2.2% | -71.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ESGL and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GREE's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESGL currently trades 76.2% from its 52-week high vs AQMS's 13.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 3.33x | 3.08x | 0.32x | 2.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.32 | $2.42 | $6.35 | $121.24 | $39.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.71 | $0.87 | $0.65 | $74.05 | $3.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.2% | +50.4% | +65.2% | +70.5% | +13.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 52.9 | 53.3 | 52.8 | 71.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80K | 138K | 3.7M | 874K | 43K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRGV as "Buy", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.3% upside for CWST (target: $119) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $2.75 | $119.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 7 | 19 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CWST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ESGL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) offers the better valuation at 712. 1x trailing P/E (63. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS?
Over the past 5 years, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) delivered a total return of +25. 7%, compared to -99. 2% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus AQMS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning GREE is approximately 933% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 107% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ESGL Holdings Limited grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS?
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 4% net margin versus -50. 9% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWST leads at 4. 9% versus -36. 5% for NRGV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESGL leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CWST: 39.
3% to $119. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, AQMS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ESGL and GREE and NRGV and CWST and AQMS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ESGL (Industrials) and GREE (Financial Services) and NRGV (Utilities) and CWST (Industrials) and AQMS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ESGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GREE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; AQMS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.