Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ESGL
ESGL Holdings Limited

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.+105.9%
GREE
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$19M
5Y Perf.-76.4%
NRGV
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$716M
5Y Perf.+3.4%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.35B
5Y Perf.+0.7%
AQMS
Aqua Metals, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-98.1%

ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ESGL logoESGL
GREE logoGREE
NRGV logoNRGV
CWST logoCWST
AQMS logoAQMS
IndustryWaste ManagementFinancial - Capital MarketsRenewable UtilitiesWaste ManagementWaste Management
Market Cap$21M$19M$716M$5.35B$17M
Revenue (TTM)$6M$60M$217M$1.88B$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-633K$-2M$-115M$7M$-23M
Gross Margin93.0%79.7%22.1%17.4%
Operating Margin-12.7%-19.2%-35.8%4.5%
Forward P/E63.9x
Total Debt$6M$68M$95M$1.24B$592K
Cash & Equiv.$635K$9M$58M$124M$11M

ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ESGL
GREE
NRGV
CWST
AQMS
StockAug 23Apr 26Return
ESGL Holdings Limit… (ESGL)100205.9+105.9%
Greenidge Generatio… (GREE)10023.6-76.4%
Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV)100103.4+3.4%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)100100.7+0.7%
Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS)1001.9-98.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NRGV and CWST are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Casella Waste Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. AQMS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ESGL
ESGL Holdings Limited
The Lower-Volatility Pick

ESGL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
GREE
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, GREE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
NRGV
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

NRGV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
  • 340.9% revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4%
  • +447.1% vs AQMS's -51.5%
Best for: growth exposure
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
  • 10.6% 10Y total return vs NRGV's -57.1%
  • Beta 0.32, current ratio 1.26x
  • Beta 0.32 vs GREE's 3.33
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
AQMS
Aqua Metals, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

AQMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.26, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.03x
  • 1.2% margin vs NRGV's -53.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNRGV logoNRGV340.9% revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4%
Quality / MarginsAQMS logoAQMS1.2% margin vs NRGV's -53.0%
Stability / SafetyCWST logoCWSTBeta 0.32 vs GREE's 3.33
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NRGV logoNRGV+447.1% vs AQMS's -51.5%
Efficiency (ROA)CWST logoCWST0.2% ROA vs AQMS's -157.5%, ROIC 2.6% vs -166.7%

ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ESGLESGL Holdings Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

GREEGreenidge Generation Holdings Inc.
FY 2024
Cryptocurrency Mining
64.2%$19M
Power And Capacity
35.8%$11M
NRGVEnergy Vault Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Intellectual Property Licensing
86.0%$3M
Software Licensing
14.0%$540,000
CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M
AQMSAqua Metals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCWSTLAGGINGAQMS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CWST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CWST and AQMS operate at a comparable scale, with $1.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. CWST is the more profitable business, keeping 0.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRGV's -53.0%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricESGL logoESGLESGL Holdings Lim…GREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6M$60M$217M$1.9B$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M-$72M$414M-$22M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$115M$7M-$23M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$20M-$98M$102M-$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+93.0%+79.7%+22.1%+17.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.7%-19.2%-35.8%+4.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.4%-33.2%-53.0%+0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-84.1%-37.7%-45.2%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+156.4%+9.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.3%+2.3%-42.9%-18.6%+71.4%
CWST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ESGL leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ESGL's 13.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GREE's 38.9x.

MetricESGL logoESGLESGL Holdings Lim…GREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$21M$19M$716M$5.4B$17M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$27M$79M$752M$6.5B$7M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-33.57x-0.65x-6.37x712.08x-0.34x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.63.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.94x38.86x15.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.49x0.32x3.52x2.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.45x7.50x3.46x0.52x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF63.17x
ESGL leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CWST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CWST delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AQMS. AQMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRGV's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESGL scores 5/9 vs AQMS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricESGL logoESGLESGL Holdings Lim…GREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.6%-146.8%+0.5%-2.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.5%-3.2%-40.3%+0.2%-157.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-3.2%-57.2%-49.5%+2.6%-166.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.7%-23.9%-53.7%+2.9%-139.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953443
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.44x1.07x0.79x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6M$59M$36M$1.1B-$10M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$634,882$9M$58M$124M$11M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$68M$95M$1.2B$592,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.14x0.70x-10.33x1.12x-32.95x
CWST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NRGV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CWST five years ago would be worth $12,572 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $82 for GREE. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs AQMS's -51.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.0% vs AQMS's -71.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricESGL logoESGLESGL Holdings Lim…GREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-21.8%-25.6%-15.3%-13.4%-3.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+50.5%+29.0%+447.1%-28.9%-51.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.5%-71.0%+140.7%-6.3%-97.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.5%-99.2%-57.7%+25.7%-99.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.4%-62.9%-57.1%+1059.4%-99.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-31.9%-33.8%+34.0%-2.2%-71.6%
NRGV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ESGL and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GREE's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESGL currently trades 76.2% from its 52-week high vs AQMS's 13.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricESGL logoESGLESGL Holdings Lim…GREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.36x3.33x3.08x0.32x2.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.32$2.42$6.35$121.24$39.40
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.71$0.87$0.65$74.05$3.37
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.2%+50.4%+65.2%+70.5%+13.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.452.953.352.871.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded80K138K3.7M874K43K
Evenly matched — ESGL and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: NRGV as "Buy", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.3% upside for CWST (target: $119) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).

MetricESGL logoESGLESGL Holdings Lim…GREE logoGREEGreenidge Generat…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.75$119.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts719
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CWST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ESGL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallCasella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ESGL vs GREE vs NRGV vs CWST vs AQMS: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) offers the better valuation at 712. 1x trailing P/E (63. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS?

Over the past 5 years, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) delivered a total return of +25. 7%, compared to -99. 2% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus AQMS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning GREE is approximately 933% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 107% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ESGL Holdings Limited grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS?

Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 4% net margin versus -50. 9% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWST leads at 4. 9% versus -36. 5% for NRGV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESGL leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CWST: 39.

3% to $119. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is ESGL or GREE or NRGV or CWST or AQMS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, AQMS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ESGL and GREE and NRGV and CWST and AQMS?

These companies operate in different sectors (ESGL (Industrials) and GREE (Financial Services) and NRGV (Utilities) and CWST (Industrials) and AQMS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ESGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GREE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; AQMS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ESGL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GREE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NRGV

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 78%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AQMS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ESGL and GREE and NRGV and CWST and AQMS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ESGL: -1.0% · GREE: -15.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.