Waste Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ESGL vs NRGV vs FLNC vs GREE vs STEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Renewable Utilities
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Infrastructure
ESGL vs NRGV vs FLNC vs GREE vs STEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Renewable Utilities | Renewable Utilities | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $21M | $784M | $3.18B | $19M | $78M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $217M | $2.58B | $60M | $149M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-633K | $-115M | $-42M | $-2M | $139M |
| Gross Margin | 93.0% | 22.1% | 11.7% | 79.7% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | -12.7% | -35.8% | -1.8% | -19.2% | -46.8% |
| Total Debt | $6M | $95M | $391M | $68M | $369M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $635K | $58M | $691M | $9M | $49M |
ESGL vs NRGV vs FLNC vs GREE vs STEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESGL Holdings Limit… (ESGL) | 100 | 205.9 | +105.9% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 103.4 | +3.4% |
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | 100 | 52.2 | -47.8% |
| Greenidge Generatio… (GREE) | 100 | 23.6 | -76.4% |
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 8.7 | -91.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESGL vs NRGV vs FLNC vs GREE vs STEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESGL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.42
- Rev growth -1.0%, EPS growth 98.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 44.0%, current ratio 0.23x
- Beta 0.42 vs STEM's 3.78
NRGV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and momentum.
- 340.9% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1%
- +475.7% vs STEM's -17.1%
FLNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -31.0% 10Y total return vs NRGV's -53.1%
GREE is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 3.37, current ratio 1.39x
STEM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 93.3% margin vs NRGV's -53.0%
- 41.8% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC -52.6% vs -49.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 93.3% margin vs NRGV's -53.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs STEM's 3.78 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +475.7% vs STEM's -17.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 41.8% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC -52.6% vs -49.5% |
ESGL vs NRGV vs FLNC vs GREE vs STEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ESGL vs NRGV vs FLNC vs GREE vs STEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ESGL leads in 3 of 6 categories
NRGV leads 0 • FLNC leads 0 • GREE leads 0 • STEM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ESGL and STEM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 423.7x ESGL's $6M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 93.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRGV's -53.0%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $217M | $2.6B | $60M | $149M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$72M | -$19M | $4M | -$27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$115M | -$42M | -$2M | $139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$98M | -$271M | -$20M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.0% | +22.1% | +11.7% | +79.7% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | -35.8% | -1.8% | -19.2% | -46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | -53.0% | -1.6% | -33.2% | +93.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -84.1% | -45.2% | -10.5% | -37.7% | -5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +156.4% | +7.7% | — | -21.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -42.9% | +33.3% | +2.3% | +27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ESGL leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ESGL's 13.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GREE's 38.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $784M | $3.2B | $19M | $78M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $820M | $2.9B | $78M | $398M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.57x | -6.97x | -65.30x | -0.64x | -1.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.94x | — | — | 38.78x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.49x | 3.85x | 1.40x | 0.32x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 8.21x | 5.74x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 11.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ESGL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ESGL delivers a -5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. ESGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRGV's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STEM scores 6/9 vs GREE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.6% | -146.8% | -8.3% | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | -40.3% | -1.8% | -3.2% | +41.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.2% | -49.5% | -15.9% | -57.2% | -52.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.7% | -53.7% | -5.7% | -23.9% | -22.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 1.07x | 0.71x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $36M | -$300M | $59M | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $634,882 | $58M | $691M | $9M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $95M | $391M | $68M | $369M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.14x | -10.33x | — | 0.70x | 5.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NRGV and FLNC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLNC five years ago would be worth $6,903 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $85 for GREE. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +475.7% total return vs STEM's -17.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 38.1% vs STEM's -52.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.8% | -7.4% | +5.0% | -26.2% | -46.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.7% | +475.7% | +401.2% | +31.0% | -17.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | +163.4% | +28.2% | -71.2% | -89.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | -53.6% | -31.0% | -99.1% | -97.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.4% | -53.1% | -31.0% | -62.9% | -95.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.9% | +38.1% | +8.6% | -34.0% | -52.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ESGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ESGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESGL currently trades 76.2% from its 52-week high vs STEM's 28.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 2.97x | 3.57x | 3.37x | 3.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.32 | $6.35 | $33.51 | $2.42 | $32.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.71 | $0.65 | $3.93 | $0.87 | $5.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.2% | +71.3% | +72.1% | +50.0% | +28.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 52.1 | 73.5 | 51.3 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 83K | 3.7M | 5.8M | 138K | 159K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRGV as "Buy", FLNC as "Hold", STEM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 125.7% upside for STEM (target: $21) vs -21.6% for FLNC (target: $19).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 | $18.93 | — | $20.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 27 | — | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ESGL leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
ESGL vs NRGV vs FLNC vs GREE vs STEM: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESGL or NRGV or FLNC or GREE or STEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ESGL or NRGV or FLNC or GREE or STEM?
Over the past 5 years, Fluence Energy, Inc.
(FLNC) delivered a total return of -31. 0%, compared to -99. 1% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLNC returned -31. 0% versus STEM's -95. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ESGL or NRGV or FLNC or GREE or STEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ESGL Holdings Limited (ESGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 78β — meaning STEM is approximately 802% more volatile than ESGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ESGL Holdings Limited (ESGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 107% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ESGL or NRGV or FLNC or GREE or STEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ESGL Holdings Limited grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -408. 3% for Fluence Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLNC leads at 23. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ESGL or NRGV or FLNC or GREE or STEM?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -50. 9% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLNC leads at -2. 0% versus -36. 5% for NRGV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESGL leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ESGL or NRGV or FLNC or GREE or STEM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ESGL or NRGV or FLNC or GREE or STEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ESGL Holdings Limited (ESGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
42)). Stem, Inc. (STEM) carries a higher beta of 3. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ESGL: -87. 4%, STEM: -95. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ESGL and NRGV and FLNC and GREE and STEM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ESGL (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities) and FLNC (Utilities) and GREE (Financial Services) and STEM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ESGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GREE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.