ETD
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$519M
5Y Perf.+80.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ETD vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$295M
5Y Perf.+455.5%
ETD vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ETD | FLXS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $519M | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $593M | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $40M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 60.4% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $124M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $40M |
ETD vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ETD
FLXS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethan Allen Interio… (ETD) | 100 | 180.6 | +80.6% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 555.5 | +455.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ETD vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FLXS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ETD
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
The Income Pick
ETD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 9.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 25.8%, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 1.11, yield 9.6%, current ratio 2.03x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs ETD's 7.3%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs ETD's -4.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FLXS | 6.9% revenue growth vs ETD's -4.9% |
| Value | FLXS | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 14.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | ETD | 6.8% margin vs FLXS's 4.8% |
| Stability / Safety | ETD | Beta 1.11 vs FLXS's 1.51, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ETD | 9.6% yield, vs FLXS's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | FLXS | +80.1% vs ETD's -12.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FLXS | 7.5% ROA vs ETD's 5.5%, ROIC 9.9% vs 8.7% |
ETD vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2023
ETD vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFLXSLAGGINGETD
ETDEthan Allen Interiors…
1leads
FLXSFlexsteel Industries,…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ETDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ETD4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FLXS8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FLXS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETD and FLXS operate at a comparable scale, with $593M and $458M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.8% (ETD) to 4.8% (FLXS). On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $593M | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $40M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.4% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.8% | -27.2% |
ETD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ETD and FLXS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, ETD trades at a 35% valuation discount to FLXS's 15.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ETD's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLXS's 10.4x.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $519M | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $568M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.15x | 15.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.22x | 11.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.32x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.84x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.30x | 8.74x |
Evenly matched — ETD and FLXS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $8 for ETD. ETD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLXS's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs ETD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $124M | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 199.47x | 380.21x |
FLXS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,450 for ETD. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs ETD's -12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs ETD's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | +38.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.1% | +80.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.7% | +242.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.5% | +19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.3% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.2% | +50.7% |
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ETD and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ETD is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLXS's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs ETD's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.41 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.01 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.7 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 370K | 47K |
Evenly matched — ETD and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ETD and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for ETD (target: $24) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, ETD offers the higher dividend yield at 9.57% vs FLXS's 1.14%.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.6% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.95 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
Evenly matched — ETD and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ETD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
Best OverallFlexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ETD vs FLXS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ETD or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD). Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ETD or FLXS?
On trailing P/E, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. at 15. 5x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ETD or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -5. 5% for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus ETD's +7. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ETD or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning FLXS is approximately 36% more volatile than ETD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 35% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ETD or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -4. 9% for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLXS leads at -6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ETD or FLXS?
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 4. 6% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETD leads at 10. 1% versus 6. 0% for FLXS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETD leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ETD or FLXS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ETD: 17. 6% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ETD or FLXS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) offers the highest yield at 9. 6%, versus 1. 1% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS).
09Is ETD or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 9. 6% yield). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETD: +7. 3%, FLXS: +51. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ETD and FLXS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ETD: -4.8% · FLXS: 9.8%)Net Margin>
%
(ETD: 6.8% · FLXS: 4.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ETD: 10.2x · FLXS: 15.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.