Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ETH vs COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Application
ETH vs COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $554M | $50.96B | $4.83B | $9.14B | $3.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $615M | $7.18B | $907M | $647M | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $801M | $-1.31B | $-867M | $-261M |
| Gross Margin | 60.5% | 74.6% | -47.7% | -15.6% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 20.0% | -90.6% | -61.8% | -26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 66.1x | — | — | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $124M | $7.83B | $3.65B | $280M | $824M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $11.29B | $547M | $234M | $43M |
ETH vs COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 70.7 | -29.3% |
| Coinbase Global, In… (COIN) | 100 | 86.0 | -14.0% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | 100 | 236.6 | +136.6% |
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 87.4 | -12.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ETH vs COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ETH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.91, Low D/E 25.6%, current ratio 2.03x
- PEG 0.20 vs COIN's 1.31
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 12.5x)
- Beta 2.91 vs RIOT's 3.87
COIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 17.6% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs COIN's -41.2%
- +207.5% vs MARA's -4.7%
CLSK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.39, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- Beta 3.39, yield 0.2%, current ratio 4.18x
- 102.2% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.2% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 12.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs MARA's -144.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.91 vs RIOT's 3.87 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.5% vs MARA's -4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs RIOT's -21.5%, ROIC 7.6% vs -8.7% |
ETH vs COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ETH vs COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ETH leads in 2 of 6 categories
COIN leads 1 • CLSK leads 1 • MARA leads 0 • RIOT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 11.7x ETH's $615M. COIN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $615M | $7.2B | $907M | $647M | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $202M | $627M | -$450M | $181M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $801M | -$1.3B | -$867M | -$261M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $2.8B | -$312M | -$1.0B | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.5% | +74.6% | -47.7% | -15.6% | +41.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +20.0% | -90.6% | -61.8% | -26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +17.6% | -144.6% | -102.4% | -33.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +33.8% | -34.4% | -119.6% | -133.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +11.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.1% | -7.2% | -4.8% | -60.0% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ETH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 75% valuation discount to COIN's 43.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ETH offers better value at 0.25x vs COIN's 0.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $554M | $51.0B | $4.8B | $9.1B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $602M | $47.5B | $7.9B | $9.2B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.84x | 43.36x | -3.44x | -12.36x | 12.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.55x | 66.07x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.25x | 0.86x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.71x | 29.25x | — | — | 6.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 7.10x | 5.32x | 14.12x | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 3.75x | 1.30x | 2.87x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9999.00x | 21.00x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ETH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ETH delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +5.7% | -30.5% | -28.8% | -13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +2.8% | -17.1% | -21.5% | -8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +5.7% | -9.0% | -8.7% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +8.1% | -12.1% | -11.0% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.53x | 1.05x | 0.10x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | -$3.5B | $3.1B | $46M | $781M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $11.3B | $547M | $234M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $124M | $7.8B | $3.6B | $280M | $824M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 721.00x | 16.97x | 4.73x | -16.47x | -18.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — COIN and RIOT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COIN five years ago would be worth $7,317 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,054 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +207.5% total return vs MARA's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COIN at 49.2% vs ETH's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.1% | -18.4% | +28.2% | +70.3% | +21.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.9% | -1.8% | -4.7% | +207.5% | +74.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +232.1% | +36.1% | +129.8% | +229.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.3% | -26.8% | -59.5% | -27.8% | -26.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.8% | -41.2% | -51.6% | +787.3% | -84.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.7% | +49.2% | +10.8% | +32.0% | +48.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ETH and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ETH is the less volatile stock with a 2.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs COIN's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.91x | 3.17x | 3.11x | 3.87x | 3.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.78 | $444.65 | $23.45 | $24.14 | $23.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.85 | $139.36 | $6.66 | $7.68 | $7.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.6% | +43.4% | +54.2% | +99.9% | +59.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 53.9 | 69.6 | 74.5 | 71.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 10.8M | 47.6M | 18.4M | 19.0M |
Analyst Outlook
CLSK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ETH as "Hold", COIN as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for CLSK (target: $20) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $243.33 | $16.13 | $27.90 | $20.21 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 37 | 19 | 18 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — | — | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | +1.0% | +0.0% | +4.1% |
ETH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). COIN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ETH vs COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ETH or COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ETH or COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 10.
8x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust wins at 0. 20x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. 's 1. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ETH or COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
Over the past 5 years, Coinbase Global, Inc.
(COIN) delivered a total return of -26. 8%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus CLSK's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ETH or COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
91β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning RIOT is approximately 33% more volatile than ETH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ETH or COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ETH or COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COIN leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ETH or COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. 's 1. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 66. 1x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 57. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLSK: 44. 6% to $20. 21.
08Which pays a better dividend — ETH or COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
In this comparison, CLSK (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. ETH, COIN, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ETH or COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.
(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+787. 3% 10Y return). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +787. 3%, CLSK: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ETH and COIN and MARA and RIOT and CLSK?
These companies operate in different sectors (ETH (Financial Services) and COIN (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.