Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ETON vs KALA vs LNTH vs RCKT vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ETON vs KALA vs LNTH vs RCKT vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $802M | $589K | $6.06B | $396M | $9.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80M | $254K | $1.55B | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-36M | $279M | $-209M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | -3.1% | 60.5% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.1% | -150.6% | 18.8% | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 33.2x | — | 17.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $32M | $738K | $25M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $51M | $359M | $78M | $357M |
ETON vs KALA vs LNTH vs RCKT vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eton Pharmaceutical… (ETON) | 100 | 406.7 | +306.7% |
| KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH) | 100 | 856.9 | +756.9% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 13.0 | -87.0% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ETON vs KALA vs LNTH vs RCKT vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ETON is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56
KALA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 262.9%, EPS growth 59.8%
- 262.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
LNTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 42.9% 10Y total return vs ETON's 374.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
- Beta 0.45, current ratio 2.70x
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, RCKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs KALA's -97.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 262.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs KALA's -141.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs KALA's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs KALA's -97.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs KALA's -143.2% |
ETON vs KALA vs LNTH vs RCKT vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ETON vs KALA vs LNTH vs RCKT vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNTH leads in 4 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • ETON leads 1 • KALA leads 0 • RCKT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. LNTH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KALA's -141.1%. On growth, ETON holds the edge at +82.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80M | $254,000 | $1.5B | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | -$38M | $347M | -$208M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$36M | $279M | -$209M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$333,000 | -$32M | $372M | -$180M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | -3.1% | +60.5% | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | -150.6% | +18.8% | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | -141.1% | +18.0% | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | -126.3% | +24.0% | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.7% | — | +1.2% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +44.6% | +76.5% | +25.0% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LNTH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $802M | $589,431 | $6.1B | $396M | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $785M | -$18M | $5.7B | $343M | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -174.41x | -0.01x | 27.29x | -1.81x | -24.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.19x | — | 17.70x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 14.96x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.03x | — | 3.93x | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 30.50x | 0.04x | 5.84x | 1.46x | 8.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.69x | — | 17.11x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-4 for KALA. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KALA's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ETON scores 5/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.8% | -3.9% | +24.3% | -70.8% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.8% | -143.2% | +12.4% | -59.6% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | — | +30.6% | -62.4% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | -95.2% | +17.1% | -58.1% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 2.62x | 0.00x | 0.09x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | -$19M | -$358M | -$53M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $51M | $359M | $78M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $32M | $738,000 | $25M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.07x | -6.92x | 15.83x | -41.65x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNTH five years ago would be worth $43,814 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for KALA. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +767.1% total return vs KALA's -97.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.0% vs KALA's -82.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +82.3% | -87.2% | +38.3% | +4.9% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +71.1% | -97.7% | +15.7% | -48.4% | +767.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +754.5% | -99.5% | -1.9% | -83.0% | +1956.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +285.1% | -100.0% | +338.1% | -91.6% | -14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +374.4% | -100.0% | +4289.6% | -91.4% | -20.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +104.4% | -82.9% | -0.6% | -44.6% | +174.0% |
Risk & Volatility
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KALA's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs KALA's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 2.14x | 0.45x | 1.21x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.30 | $20.60 | $94.86 | $7.39 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.09 | $0.07 | $47.25 | $2.19 | $35.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.8% | +0.4% | +98.1% | +49.1% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.7 | 24.1 | 69.9 | 48.4 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 391K | 9.3M | 872K | 3.5M | 376K |
Analyst Outlook
ETON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ETON as "Buy", KALA as "Buy", LNTH as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22913.9% upside for KALA (target: $18) vs -15.7% for ETON (target: $25).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $18.25 | $99.25 | $5.00 | $548.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LNTH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns).
ETON vs KALA vs LNTH vs RCKT vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ETON or KALA or LNTH or RCKT or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ETON) is the stronger pick with 104. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) offers the better valuation at 27. 3x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ETON) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ETON or KALA or LNTH or RCKT or PRAX?
On forward P/E, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 17. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ETON or KALA or LNTH or RCKT or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) delivered a total return of +338. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +42. 9% versus KALA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ETON or KALA or LNTH or RCKT or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus KALA BIO, Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning KALA is approximately 370% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for KALA BIO, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ETON or KALA or LNTH or RCKT or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ETON) is pulling ahead at 104. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KALA BIO, Inc. grew EPS 59. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ETON leads at 55. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ETON or KALA or LNTH or RCKT or PRAX?
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -141. 1% for KALA BIO, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus -150. 6% for KALA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNTH leads at 61. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ETON or KALA or LNTH or RCKT or PRAX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) trades at 17. 7x forward P/E versus 33. 2x for Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KALA: 22913. 9% to $18. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ETON or KALA or LNTH or RCKT or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ETON or KALA or LNTH or RCKT or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ETON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +374. 4% 10Y return). KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETON: +374. 4%, KALA: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ETON and KALA and LNTH and RCKT and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ETON is a small-cap high-growth stock; KALA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.