Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EVER vs OPEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
EVER vs OPEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $728M | $5.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $717M | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $110M | $-1.30B |
| Gross Margin | 97.5% | 8.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | -6.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $962M |
EVER vs OPEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) | 100 | 35.4 | -64.6% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVER vs OPEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVER carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.25
- Rev growth 38.5%, EPS growth 198.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.7%
- 15.8% 10Y total return vs OPEN's -49.6%
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +6.8% vs EVER's -11.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.5% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs OPEN's -29.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.8% vs EVER's -11.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 38.3% ROA vs OPEN's -54.0%, ROIC 54.8% vs -16.6% |
EVER vs OPEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EVER vs OPEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVER leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 6.1x EVER's $717M. EVER is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -29.7%. On growth, EVER holds the edge at +14.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $717M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $85M | -$287M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $110M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $99M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.5% | +8.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | -6.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | -29.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +23.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | -32.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +142.9% | -7.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EVER and OPEN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $728M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $635M | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.82x | -3.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.39x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.02x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.05x | 1.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.26x | 4.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.06x | 5.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVER leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVER delivers a 53.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-129 for OPEN. EVER carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPEN's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVER scores 6/9 vs OPEN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +53.4% | -129.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +38.3% | -54.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +54.8% | -16.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.3% | -12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$93M | -$769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $962M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EVER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EVER five years ago would be worth $6,572 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,054 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +675.8% total return vs EVER's -11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EVER at 45.7% vs OPEN's 38.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.1% | -10.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.3% | +675.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.3% | +165.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.3% | -69.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.8% | -49.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.7% | +38.4% |
Risk & Volatility
EVER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EVER is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVER currently trades 71.6% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 50.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 3.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.73 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.88 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.6% | +50.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.1 | 51.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 955K | 36.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EVER as "Buy" and OPEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.5% upside for OPEN (target: $7) vs 10.6% for EVER (target: $23).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.75 | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +22.8% |
EVER leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
EVER vs OPEN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVER or OPEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EverQuote, Inc.
(EVER) is the stronger pick with 38. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EVER or OPEN?
Over the past 5 years, EverQuote, Inc.
(EVER) delivered a total return of -34. 3%, compared to -69. 5% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVER returned +15. 8% versus OPEN's -49. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EVER or OPEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EverQuote, Inc.
(EVER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 148% more volatile than EVER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 19% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EVER or OPEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EverQuote, Inc.
(EVER) is pulling ahead at 38. 5% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EverQuote, Inc. grew EPS 198. 9% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVER leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EVER or OPEN?
EverQuote, Inc.
(EVER) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVER leads at 9. 6% versus -6. 6% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVER leads at 97. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EVER or OPEN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPEN: 19.
5% to $6. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — EVER or OPEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is EVER or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EverQuote, Inc.
(EVER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 25)). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVER: +15. 8%, OPEN: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EVER and OPEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (EVER (Communication Services) and OPEN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EVER is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.