Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EVH vs HQY vs TDOC vs OSCR vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Equipment & Services
EVH vs HQY vs TDOC vs OSCR vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $488M | $7.14B | $1.26B | $5.41B | $6.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.89B | $1.31B | $2.51B | $13.30B | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-497M | $215M | $-171M | $-39M | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | 69.5% | 65.6% | 17.4% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | -27.4% | 24.6% | -7.6% | 0.1% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 31.2x | 21.2x | — | 34.7x | 51.5x |
| Total Debt | $990M | $44M | $1.04B | $430M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $152M | $319M | $781M | $2.77B | $229M |
EVH vs HQY vs TDOC vs OSCR vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH) | 100 | 21.2 | -78.8% |
| HealthEquity, Inc. (HQY) | 100 | 123.5 | +23.5% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 3.8 | -96.2% |
| Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 194.0 | +94.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVH vs HQY vs TDOC vs OSCR vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 2.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
HQY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.04
- 228.2% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 2.1%, current ratio 3.27x
- Beta 1.04, current ratio 3.27x
Among these 5 stocks, TDOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
OSCR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +22.6% vs EVH's -59.0%
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs EVH's -26.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs EVH's -26.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.2x vs 51.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs EVH's -26.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.6% vs EVH's -59.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs EVH's -22.8%, ROIC 10.2% vs -0.2% |
EVH vs HQY vs TDOC vs OSCR vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
EVH vs HQY vs TDOC vs OSCR vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HQY leads in 3 of 6 categories
OSCR leads 1 • EVH leads 0 • TDOC leads 0 • HIMS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HQY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSCR is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.3B annually — 10.1x HQY's $1.3B. HQY is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EVH's -26.3%. On growth, OSCR holds the edge at +52.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $1.3B | $2.5B | $13.3B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$403M | $322M | $42M | $40M | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$497M | $215M | -$171M | -$39M | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $439M | $251M | $2.8B | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +69.5% | +65.6% | +17.4% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.4% | +24.6% | -7.6% | +0.1% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.3% | +16.4% | -6.8% | -0.3% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +33.4% | +10.0% | +21.0% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +7.3% | -2.5% | +52.6% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.9% | +93.3% | +32.1% | +125.0% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EVH and TDOC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.1x trailing earnings, HQY trades at a 32% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EVH's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $488M | $7.1B | $1.3B | $5.4B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $6.9B | $1.5B | $3.1B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.84x | 34.14x | -6.11x | -12.35x | 50.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.17x | 21.23x | — | 34.65x | 51.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.41x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.90x | 21.29x | 15.13x | — | 42.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 5.44x | 0.50x | 0.46x | 2.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 3.49x | 0.89x | 5.58x | 12.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 102.63x | 15.69x | 4.40x | 5.11x | 89.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HQY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-78 for EVH. HQY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EVH's 2.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HQY scores 9/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -77.9% | +10.1% | -12.4% | -3.3% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.8% | +6.3% | -5.9% | -0.6% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +10.2% | -11.5% | — | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +9.8% | -10.0% | -25.3% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.38x | 0.02x | 0.75x | 0.44x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $838M | -$275M | $259M | -$2.3B | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $152M | $319M | $781M | $2.8B | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $990M | $44M | $1.0B | $430M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.04x | 5.64x | -8.76x | -0.57x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSCR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $461 for TDOC. Over the past 12 months, OSCR leads with a +22.6% total return vs EVH's -59.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSCR at 40.5% vs EVH's -50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.0% | -7.8% | -1.3% | +39.4% | -23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.0% | -8.4% | +1.5% | +22.6% | -51.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | +56.0% | -73.3% | +177.5% | +116.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.4% | +12.7% | -95.4% | -7.3% | +137.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.6% | +228.2% | -41.1% | -40.0% | +161.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.2% | +16.0% | -35.6% | +40.5% | +29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HQY and OSCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HQY is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSCR currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs EVH's 35.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.04x | 1.91x | 1.84x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.07 | $116.65 | $9.77 | $23.80 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $72.90 | $4.40 | $10.69 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.5% | +72.0% | +71.2% | +87.7% | +36.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 52.7 | 74.1 | 78.5 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 876K | 5.5M | 6.5M | 34.9M |
Analyst Outlook
HQY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EVH as "Buy", HQY as "Buy", TDOC as "Hold", OSCR as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.1% upside for EVH (target: $6) vs -19.7% for OSCR (target: $17). EVH is the only dividend payer here at 2.28% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.38 | $109.89 | $7.58 | $16.75 | $29.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 27 | 42 | 11 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.2% | +4.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% |
HQY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OSCR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
EVH vs HQY vs TDOC vs OSCR vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVH or HQY or TDOC or OSCR or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 6% for Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH). HealthEquity, Inc. (HQY) offers the better valuation at 34. 1x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EVH or HQY or TDOC or OSCR or HIMS?
On trailing P/E, HealthEquity, Inc.
(HQY) is the cheapest at 34. 1x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, HealthEquity, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EVH or HQY or TDOC or OSCR or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -95. 4% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HQY returned +228. 2% versus EVH's -63. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EVH or HQY or TDOC or OSCR or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HealthEquity, Inc.
(HQY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 131% more volatile than HQY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HealthEquity, Inc. (HQY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Evolent Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EVH or HQY or TDOC or OSCR or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -26. 6% for Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HealthEquity, Inc. grew EPS 125. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EVH or HQY or TDOC or OSCR or HIMS?
HealthEquity, Inc.
(HQY) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus -28. 5% for Evolent Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HQY leads at 24. 6% versus -10. 4% for TDOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HQY leads at 69. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EVH or HQY or TDOC or OSCR or HIMS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HealthEquity, Inc.
(HQY) trades at 21. 2x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 30. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVH: 49. 1% to $6. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — EVH or HQY or TDOC or OSCR or HIMS?
In this comparison, EVH (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. HQY, TDOC, OSCR, HIMS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EVH or HQY or TDOC or OSCR or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Evolent Health, Inc.
(EVH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), 2. 3% yield). Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVH: -63. 6%, TDOC: -41. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EVH and HQY and TDOC and OSCR and HIMS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EVH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HQY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OSCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. EVH pays a dividend while HQY, TDOC, OSCR, HIMS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.