Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EVOK vs PRPO vs AYTU vs SUPN vs PRGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
EVOK vs PRPO vs AYTU vs SUPN vs PRGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $19M | $53M | $16M | $3.01B | $1.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $22M | $63M | $777M | $4.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-1M | $-24M | $-29M | $-1.82B |
| Gross Margin | 97.0% | 47.5% | 66.0% | 89.4% | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | -36.0% | -9.7% | -13.9% | -5.5% | -4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 24.1x | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $1M | $23M | $41M | $3.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $1M | $31M | $128M | $532M |
EVOK vs PRPO vs AYTU vs SUPN vs PRGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evoke Pharma, Inc. (EVOK) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| Precipio, Inc. (PRPO) | 100 | 145.2 | +45.2% |
| Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 189.0 | +89.0% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 24.4 | -75.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVOK vs PRPO vs AYTU vs SUPN vs PRGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVOK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 97.8%, EPS growth 90.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 85.0%
- 97.8% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
PRPO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- beta 0.41
- Beta 0.41 vs AYTU's 1.27, lower leverage
- +367.7% vs PRGO's -51.2%
Among these 5 stocks, AYTU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SUPN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 228.4% 10Y total return vs PRGO's -77.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 1.90x
- Beta 0.78, current ratio 1.90x
- -3.7% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
PRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 24.1x)
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 97.8% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 24.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.7% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs AYTU's 1.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +367.7% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.0% ROA vs EVOK's -33.4%, ROIC -2.8% vs -6.1% |
EVOK vs PRPO vs AYTU vs SUPN vs PRGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EVOK vs PRPO vs AYTU vs SUPN vs PRGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGO leads in 1 of 6 categories
SUPN leads 1 • PRPO leads 1 • EVOK leads 1 • AYTU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EVOK and SUPN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 289.7x EVOK's $14M. SUPN is the more profitable business, keeping -3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, EVOK holds the edge at +61.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $22M | $63M | $777M | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$549,000 | -$4M | $29M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$1M | -$24M | -$29M | -$1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $589,000 | -$698,000 | $82M | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.0% | +47.5% | +66.0% | +89.4% | +34.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.0% | -9.7% | -13.9% | -5.5% | -4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.2% | -5.8% | -39.0% | -3.7% | -43.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.0% | +2.7% | -1.1% | +10.6% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.4% | +18.3% | -6.5% | +38.6% | -7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.1% | +88.1% | -3.0% | +81.0% | -56.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUPN's 53.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19M | $53M | $16M | $3.0B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $53M | $7M | $2.9B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.91x | -10.38x | -1.14x | -76.88x | -1.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 24.12x | 5.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 53.44x | 7.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 3.32x | 0.23x | 4.19x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.98x | 3.68x | 0.82x | 2.78x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 245.72x | — | 65.45x | 11.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SUPN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SUPN delivers a -2.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-172 for AYTU. SUPN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRPO scores 5/9 vs AYTU's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -155.4% | -9.1% | -172.1% | -2.7% | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -33.4% | -5.9% | -20.0% | -2.0% | -19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.1% | -24.3% | -33.5% | -2.8% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | -30.5% | -13.3% | -3.4% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.73x | 0.10x | 1.21x | 0.04x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$136,000 | -$8M | -$87M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $1M | $31M | $128M | $532M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $1M | $23M | $41M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.45x | -13.58x | -7.96x | — | -7.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRPO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPN five years ago would be worth $17,801 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $215 for AYTU. Over the past 12 months, PRPO leads with a +367.7% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRPO at 36.3% vs EVOK's -25.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +27.6% | -10.8% | +5.7% | -13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +253.7% | +367.7% | +104.1% | +69.0% | -51.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.8% | +153.3% | +40.3% | +42.1% | -58.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -60.4% | -97.8% | +78.0% | -60.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -98.9% | -100.0% | +228.4% | -77.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.6% | +36.3% | +12.0% | +12.4% | -25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
EVOK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EVOK is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AYTU's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVOK currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.13x | 0.41x | 1.27x | 0.78x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $33.61 | $3.07 | $59.68 | $28.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.46 | $5.94 | $1.20 | $29.16 | $9.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +90.4% | +80.5% | +87.6% | +41.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 85.1 | 53.9 | 48.9 | 57.9 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 30K | 42K | 604K | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SUPN as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 70.6% upside for PRGO (target: $20) vs 14.8% for SUPN (target: $60). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $60.00 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 14 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRGO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SUPN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
EVOK vs PRPO vs AYTU vs SUPN vs PRGO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVOK or PRPO or AYTU or SUPN or PRGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Evoke Pharma, Inc.
(EVOK) is the stronger pick with 97. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Analysts rate Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EVOK or PRPO or AYTU or SUPN or PRGO?
Over the past 5 years, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) delivered a total return of +78. 0%, compared to -97. 8% for Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUPN returned +228. 4% versus AYTU's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EVOK or PRPO or AYTU or SUPN or PRGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Evoke Pharma, Inc.
(EVOK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 13β versus Aytu BioPharma, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning AYTU is approximately -1073% more volatile than EVOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EVOK or PRPO or AYTU or SUPN or PRGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Evoke Pharma, Inc.
(EVOK) is pulling ahead at 97. 8% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Evoke Pharma, Inc. grew EPS 90. 0% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVOK leads at 85. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EVOK or PRPO or AYTU or SUPN or PRGO?
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the more profitable company, earning -5. 4% net margin versus -52. 2% for Evoke Pharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps -5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRGO leads at 8. 1% versus -50. 8% for EVOK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVOK leads at 96. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EVOK or PRPO or AYTU or SUPN or PRGO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 18. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 70. 6% to $20. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — EVOK or PRPO or AYTU or SUPN or PRGO?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. EVOK, PRPO, AYTU, SUPN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is EVOK or PRPO or AYTU or SUPN or PRGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Evoke Pharma, Inc.
(EVOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 13)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVOK: -98. 5%, AYTU: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EVOK and PRPO and AYTU and SUPN and PRGO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EVOK is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRPO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AYTU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. PRGO pays a dividend while EVOK, PRPO, AYTU, SUPN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.