Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EWBC vs WAL vs BOKF vs IBOC vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
EWBC vs WAL vs BOKF vs IBOC vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $16.78B | $9.04B | $10.28B | $4.56B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.69B | $5.28B | $3.36B | $1.05B | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.33B | $969M | $537M | $418M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 60.1% | 61.1% | 57.1% | 78.3% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 37.4% | 22.9% | 19.8% | 49.4% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 8.6x | 13.0x | 10.9x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $3.17B | $6.48B | $4.45B | $705M | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $656M | $3.60B | $1.43B | $536M | $108M |
EWBC vs WAL vs BOKF vs IBOC vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| East West Bancorp, … (EWBC) | 100 | 348.9 | +248.9% |
| Western Alliance Ba… (WAL) | 100 | 215.8 | +115.8% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 238.0 | +138.0% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EWBC vs WAL vs BOKF vs IBOC vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EWBC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 281.4% 10Y total return vs IBOC's 229.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAL's 0.4%
WAL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 23.1%
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.74 vs 4.48
BOKF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
- +44.8% vs CVBF's +13.1%
IBOC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- PEG 0.53 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Beta 0.83, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.04x
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.74 vs 4.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs WAL's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs CVBF's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAL's 0.4% |
EWBC vs WAL vs BOKF vs IBOC vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EWBC vs WAL vs BOKF vs IBOC vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBOC leads in 3 of 6 categories
WAL leads 1 • EWBC leads 0 • BOKF leads 0 • CVBF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 8.2x CVBF's $643M. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $5.3B | $3.4B | $1.1B | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $1.3B | $797M | $417M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $969M | $537M | $418M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | -$2.8B | $1.5B | $360M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.1% | +61.1% | +57.1% | +78.3% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.4% | +22.9% | +19.8% | +49.4% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.3% | +18.4% | +15.6% | +39.1% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | -52.9% | +42.6% | +47.0% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.4% | +32.8% | +1.8% | -100.0% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WAL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, WAL trades at a 42% valuation discount to BOKF's 16.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.8B | $9.0B | $10.3B | $4.6B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.3B | $11.9B | $13.3B | $4.7B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.81x | 9.43x | 16.39x | 11.07x | 13.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.47x | 8.57x | 13.05x | 10.87x | 14.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | 0.81x | 5.51x | 0.54x | 4.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.49x | 9.88x | 17.23x | 8.69x | 13.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.58x | 1.71x | 3.06x | 4.32x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.91x | 1.13x | 1.53x | 1.40x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.17x | — | 7.19x | 9.21x | 12.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EWBC delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. IBOC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAL's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EWBC scores 8/9 vs WAL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +12.8% | +8.9% | +13.2% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +3.4% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.2% | +6.5% | +4.1% | +10.5% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +10.4% | +5.5% | +5.4% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.82x | 0.80x | 0.22x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $2.9B | $3.0B | $168M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $656M | $3.6B | $1.4B | $536M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $6.5B | $4.5B | $705M | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.01x | 0.66x | 0.55x | 1.91x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EWBC and WAL and BOKF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EWBC five years ago would be worth $16,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,397 for WAL. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs CVBF's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAL at 47.0% vs BOKF's 21.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.4% | -3.2% | +13.0% | +10.7% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.7% | +17.5% | +44.8% | +20.1% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +187.3% | +218.0% | +79.4% | +88.6% | +94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.1% | -16.0% | +59.4% | +61.3% | +12.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +281.4% | +166.3% | +168.5% | +229.3% | +67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.2% | +47.0% | +21.5% | +23.5% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
IBOC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBOC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAL's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs WAL's 84.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 1.72x | 1.03x | 0.83x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $127.52 | $97.23 | $139.73 | $75.44 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $86.58 | $65.81 | $91.35 | $61.15 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +84.7% | +95.5% | +97.1% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.3 | 64.8 | 58.9 | 59.5 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 1.3M | 317K | 373K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBOC and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EWBC as "Buy", WAL as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", IBOC as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $130.67 | $87.83 | $131.57 | $85.00 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 24 | 21 | 1 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.1% | +1.7% | +1.9% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 7 | 11 | 16 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.40 | $1.69 | $2.24 | $1.40 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.8% | +0.9% | +0.1% | +2.9% |
IBOC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EWBC vs WAL vs BOKF vs IBOC vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EWBC or WAL or BOKF or IBOC or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EWBC or WAL or BOKF or IBOC or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is the cheapest at 9.
4x versus BOK Financial Corporation at 16. 4x. On forward P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation is actually cheaper at 8. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International Bancshares Corporation wins at 0. 53x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EWBC or WAL or BOKF or IBOC or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) delivered a total return of +68. 1%, compared to -16. 0% for Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EWBC returned +281. 4% versus CVBF's +67. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EWBC or WAL or BOKF or IBOC or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 1. 72β — meaning WAL is approximately 109% more volatile than IBOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 82% for Western Alliance Bancorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EWBC or WAL or BOKF or IBOC or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.
4% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Western Alliance Bancorporation grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for International Bancshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EWBC or WAL or BOKF or IBOC or CVBF?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EWBC or WAL or BOKF or IBOC or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for CVB Financial Corp. — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — EWBC or WAL or BOKF or IBOC or CVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is EWBC or WAL or BOKF or IBOC or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, WAL: +166. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EWBC and WAL and BOKF and IBOC and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.