Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EXFY vs BILL vs APPF vs MGNI vs CWAN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EXFY
Expensify, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$98M
5Y Perf.-97.5%
BILL
Bill.com Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.72B
5Y Perf.-86.6%
APPF
AppFolio, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.12B
5Y Perf.+41.2%
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.01B
5Y Perf.-20.6%
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.21B
5Y Perf.+11.5%

EXFY vs BILL vs APPF vs MGNI vs CWAN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EXFY logoEXFY
BILL logoBILL
APPF logoAPPF
MGNI logoMGNI
CWAN logoCWAN
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationAdvertising AgenciesSoftware - Application
Market Cap$98M$3.72B$6.12B$2.01B$7.21B
Revenue (TTM)$140M$1.60B$995M$723M$826M
Net Income (TTM)$-21M$163K$152M$159M$-48M
Gross Margin49.6%80.7%63.2%63.4%66.0%
Operating Margin-13.2%2.2%17.1%14.8%1.4%
Forward P/E18.5x15.7x25.0x13.4x34.6x
Total Debt$6M$1.77B$71M$279M$883M
Cash & Equiv.$63M$1.14B$107M$553M$91M

EXFY vs BILL vs APPF vs MGNI vs CWANLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EXFY
BILL
APPF
MGNI
CWAN
StockNov 21May 26Return
Expensify, Inc. (EXFY)1002.5-97.5%
Bill.com Holdings, … (BILL)10013.4-86.6%
AppFolio, Inc. (APPF)100141.2+41.2%
Magnite, Inc. (MGNI)10079.4-20.6%
Clearwater Analytic… (CWAN)100111.5+11.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EXFY vs BILL vs APPF vs MGNI vs CWAN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MGNI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. AppFolio, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CWAN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EXFY
Expensify, Inc.
The Technology Pick

EXFY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
BILL
Bill.com Holdings, Inc.
The Quality Angle

Among these 5 stocks, BILL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
APPF
AppFolio, Inc.
The Income Pick

APPF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • beta 0.71
  • 12.8% 10Y total return vs CWAN's -4.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 3.20x
  • Beta 0.71, current ratio 3.20x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.
The Value Play

MGNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (13.4x vs 34.6x)
  • 22.0% margin vs EXFY's -14.7%
  • +12.6% vs EXFY's -60.8%
Best for: value and quality
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

CWAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 61.9%, EPS growth -108.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
  • 61.9% revenue growth vs EXFY's 2.1%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCWAN logoCWAN61.9% revenue growth vs EXFY's 2.1%
ValueMGNI logoMGNILower P/E (13.4x vs 34.6x)
Quality / MarginsMGNI logoMGNI22.0% margin vs EXFY's -14.7%
Stability / SafetyAPPF logoAPPFBeta 0.71 vs BILL's 1.89, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MGNI logoMGNI+12.6% vs EXFY's -60.8%
Efficiency (ROA)APPF logoAPPF24.2% ROA vs EXFY's -11.0%, ROIC 22.4% vs -16.8%

EXFY vs BILL vs APPF vs MGNI vs CWAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EXFYExpensify, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription Fees
91.9%$131M
Interchange
15.0%$21M
Product and Service, Other
0.3%$365,000
Cashback Rewards
-7.1%$-10,085,000
BILLBill.com Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription And Transaction Fees
88.9%$1.3B
Interest On Funds Held For Customers
11.1%$162M
APPFAppFolio, Inc.
FY 2025
Value Added Services
75.9%$722M
Subscription Services
22.2%$211M
Other Services
1.9%$18M
MGNIMagnite, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$731M

EXFY vs BILL vs APPF vs MGNI vs CWAN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEXFYLAGGINGMGNI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — BILL and APPF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BILL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 11.4x EXFY's $140M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXFY's -14.7%. On growth, CWAN holds the edge at +74.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$140M$1.6B$995M$723M$826M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$14M$95M$192M$145M$94M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$21M$163,000$152M$159M-$48M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$14M$370M$234M$44M$152M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.6%+80.7%+63.2%+63.4%+66.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.2%+2.2%+17.1%+14.8%+1.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-14.7%+0.0%+15.3%+22.0%-5.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.9%+23.1%+23.5%+6.1%+18.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.8%+13.5%+20.4%+5.5%+74.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.2%+2.1%+37.2%+142.9%-137.9%
Evenly matched — BILL and APPF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EXFY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 91% valuation discount to BILL's 163.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BILL's 492.7x.

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…
Market CapShares × price$98M$3.7B$6.1B$2.0B$7.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M$4.4B$6.1B$1.7B$8.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.83x163.57x43.83x14.74x-173.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.18.50x15.72x24.99x13.45x34.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple492.68x34.66x11.43x70.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.69x2.55x6.44x2.81x9.85x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.77x1.00x11.39x2.33x3.24x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.90x12.02x25.62x12.11x43.85x
EXFY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

APPF leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

APPF delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-15 for EXFY. EXFY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BILL's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BILL scores 7/9 vs CWAN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.3%+0.0%+30.9%+18.6%-2.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.0%+0.0%+24.2%+5.3%-1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-16.8%-1.4%+22.4%+9.5%+1.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-13.1%-1.5%+25.9%+7.3%+1.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937562
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.45x0.13x0.30x0.43x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$57M$633M-$36M-$275M$792M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$63M$1.1B$107M$553M$91M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$1.8B$71M$279M$883M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.88x4.03x0.07x
APPF leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CWAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $13,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $270 for EXFY. Over the past 12 months, MGNI leads with a +12.6% total return vs EXFY's -60.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWAN at 18.3% vs EXFY's -46.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-23.4%-25.6%-26.2%-12.8%+0.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-60.8%-19.0%-20.7%+12.6%+6.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.1%-61.4%+23.4%+58.7%+65.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.3%-75.6%+30.6%-60.9%-4.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.3%+6.0%+1277.1%-4.7%-4.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-46.9%-27.2%+7.3%+16.7%+18.3%
CWAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — APPF and CWAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

APPF is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BILL's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWAN currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs EXFY's 36.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.02x1.89x0.71x1.63x0.80x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.06$57.21$326.04$26.65$25.07
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.69$34.44$142.72$10.82$15.74
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.3%+65.8%+52.2%+52.5%+96.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.443.853.255.469.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded883K1.8M349K2.1M4.0M
Evenly matched — APPF and CWAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: EXFY as "Buy", BILL as "Buy", APPF as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy", CWAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1138.7% upside for EXFY (target: $14) vs 2.8% for CWAN (target: $25).

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.75$54.22$236.67$18.00$24.96
# AnalystsCovering analysts932133113
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.2%+11.6%+3.1%+2.3%+0.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

EXFY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). APPF leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallExpensify, Inc. (EXFY)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EXFY vs BILL vs APPF vs MGNI vs CWAN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EXFY or BILL or APPF or MGNI or CWAN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) is the stronger pick with 61. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Expensify, Inc. (EXFY). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Expensify, Inc. (EXFY) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EXFY or BILL or APPF or MGNI or CWAN?

On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Bill. com Holdings, Inc. at 163. 6x. On forward P/E, Magnite, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EXFY or BILL or APPF or MGNI or CWAN?

Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.

(APPF) delivered a total return of +30. 6%, compared to -97. 3% for Expensify, Inc. (EXFY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1277% versus EXFY's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EXFY or BILL or APPF or MGNI or CWAN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AppFolio, Inc.

(APPF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Bill. com Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning BILL is approximately 167% more volatile than APPF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expensify, Inc. (EXFY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 45% for Bill. com Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EXFY or BILL or APPF or MGNI or CWAN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) is pulling ahead at 61. 9% versus 2. 1% for Expensify, Inc. (EXFY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -108. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWAN leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EXFY or BILL or APPF or MGNI or CWAN?

Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -15. 1% for Expensify, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APPF leads at 16. 1% versus -12. 7% for EXFY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BILL leads at 81. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EXFY or BILL or APPF or MGNI or CWAN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 34. 6x for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. — 21. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXFY: 1138. 7% to $13. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EXFY or BILL or APPF or MGNI or CWAN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is EXFY or BILL or APPF or MGNI or CWAN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.

(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1277% 10Y return). Bill. com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1277%, BILL: +6. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EXFY and BILL and APPF and MGNI and CWAN?

These companies operate in different sectors (EXFY (Technology) and BILL (Technology) and APPF (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services) and CWAN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EXFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BILL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CWAN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EXFY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BILL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 48%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APPF

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGNI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWAN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EXFY and BILL and APPF and MGNI and CWAN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EXFY: -5.8% · BILL: 13.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.