Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EXLS vs TASK vs EPAM vs CTSH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EXLS
ExlService Holdings, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.90B
5Y Perf.+47.5%
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$573M
5Y Perf.-81.4%
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.51B
5Y Perf.-79.6%
CTSH
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$24.61B
5Y Perf.-25.0%

EXLS vs TASK vs EPAM vs CTSH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EXLS logoEXLS
TASK logoTASK
EPAM logoEPAM
CTSH logoCTSH
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$4.90B$573M$5.51B$24.61B
Revenue (TTM)$2.16B$1.21B$5.56B$21.41B
Net Income (TTM)$252M$105M$387M$2.23B
Gross Margin38.5%35.5%28.5%32.1%
Operating Margin15.2%11.6%9.9%15.7%
Forward P/E14.1x4.6x8.2x9.1x
Total Debt$404M$298M$144M$1.57B
Cash & Equiv.$146M$212M$1.30B$1.90B

EXLS vs TASK vs EPAM vs CTSHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EXLS
TASK
EPAM
CTSH
StockJun 21May 26Return
ExlService Holdings… (EXLS)100147.5+47.5%
TaskUs, Inc. (TASK)10018.6-81.4%
EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM)10020.4-79.6%
Cognizant Technolog… (CTSH)10075.0-25.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EXLS vs TASK vs EPAM vs CTSH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EXLS and TASK are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. TaskUs, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CTSH also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EXLS
ExlService Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

EXLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 221.4% 10Y total return vs CTSH's 0.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 44.2%, current ratio 2.56x
  • Beta 0.67, current ratio 2.56x
  • 11.7% margin vs EPAM's 7.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.
The Growth Play

TASK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
  • PEG 0.18 vs CTSH's 0.75
  • 19.0% revenue growth vs CTSH's 7.0%
  • Lower P/E (4.6x vs 9.1x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.75
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
The Value Angle

EPAM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
CTSH
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
The Income Pick

CTSH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 2.4%
  • 2.4% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTASK logoTASK19.0% revenue growth vs CTSH's 7.0%
ValueTASK logoTASKLower P/E (4.6x vs 9.1x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.75
Quality / MarginsEXLS logoEXLS11.7% margin vs EPAM's 7.0%
Stability / SafetyEXLS logoEXLSBeta 0.67 vs EPAM's 1.21
DividendsCTSH logoCTSH2.4% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TASK logoTASK-28.3% vs EPAM's -34.4%
Efficiency (ROA)EXLS logoEXLS14.8% ROA vs EPAM's 8.1%, ROIC 20.4% vs 15.5%

EXLS vs TASK vs EPAM vs CTSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Digital Operations And Solutions Services
56.7%$1.0B
Analytics Services
43.3%$796M
TASKTaskUs, Inc.
FY 2025
Digital Customer Experience
75.5%$662M
AI Services
24.5%$214M
EPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Services Sector
35.5%$1.3B
Other Sectors
25.4%$940M
Software And Hi-Tech Sector
22.2%$822M
Healthcare Sector
16.9%$626M
CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
FY 2025
Healthcare Segment
30.1%$6.3B
Financial Services
29.2%$6.2B
Products and Resources
25.0%$5.3B
Communication, Media and Technology
15.6%$3.3B

EXLS vs TASK vs EPAM vs CTSH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEXLSLAGGINGEPAM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CTSH is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.4B annually — 17.7x TASK's $1.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.7% (EXLS) to 7.0% (EPAM). On growth, EXLS holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.CTSH logoCTSHCognizant Technol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.2B$1.2B$5.6B$21.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$410M$204M$684M$3.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$252M$105M$387M$2.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$297M$88M$544M$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.5%+35.5%+28.5%+32.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.2%+11.6%+9.9%+15.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.7%+8.7%+7.0%+10.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.8%+7.3%+9.8%+11.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.8%+10.3%+7.6%+5.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.5%+13.0%+18.8%+3.7%
EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TASK leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 72% valuation discount to EXLS's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TASK offers better value at 0.23x vs EPAM's 4.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricEXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.CTSH logoCTSHCognizant Technol…
Market CapShares × price$4.9B$573M$5.5B$24.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.2B$660M$4.4B$24.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.35x5.79x15.53x11.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.09x4.58x8.17x9.14x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.84x0.23x4.18x0.94x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.84x3.26x6.74x5.95x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.35x0.48x1.01x1.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.58x0.99x1.60x1.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.44x7.78x8.99x9.48x
TASK leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EXLS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

EXLS delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $11 for EPAM. EPAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TASK's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXLS scores 7/9 vs CTSH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.CTSH logoCTSHCognizant Technol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+27.2%+21.2%+10.7%+14.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+14.8%+10.3%+8.1%+10.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+20.4%+16.3%+15.5%+18.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+23.2%+16.7%+13.3%+21.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97766
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.44x0.50x0.04x0.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$257M$86M-$1.2B-$326M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$146M$212M$1.3B$1.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$404M$298M$144M$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense11.80x7.12x107.78x
EXLS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EXLS five years ago would be worth $15,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,268 for EPAM. Over the past 12 months, TASK leads with a -28.3% total return vs EPAM's -34.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXLS at 1.4% vs EPAM's -23.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.CTSH logoCTSHCognizant Technol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-24.0%-12.3%-47.9%-35.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-31.9%-28.3%-34.4%-31.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.3%-18.1%-55.0%-9.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+60.0%-67.8%-77.3%-22.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+221.4%-67.8%+48.8%+0.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.4%-6.4%-23.4%-3.4%
EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EXLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EXLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EPAM's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXLS currently trades 64.6% from its 52-week high vs TASK's 34.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.CTSH logoCTSHCognizant Technol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.67x1.12x1.21x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$48.54$18.39$222.53$87.03
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.94$5.89$99.67$50.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.6%+34.6%+46.9%+59.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.542.022.523.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.2M736K1.3M5.9M
EXLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CTSH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: EXLS as "Buy", TASK as "Buy", EPAM as "Buy", CTSH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 111.9% upside for TASK (target: $14) vs 28.4% for EXLS (target: $40). CTSH is the only dividend payer here at 2.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricEXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.CTSH logoCTSHCognizant Technol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$40.25$13.50$197.00$83.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts19113751
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises109
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.7%+4.8%0.0%+5.6%
CTSH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

EXLS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TASK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallExlService Holdings, Inc. (EXLS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EXLS vs TASK vs EPAM vs CTSH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EXLS or TASK or EPAM or CTSH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 0% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ExlService Holdings, Inc. (EXLS) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EXLS or TASK or EPAM or CTSH?

On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TaskUs, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EXLS or TASK or EPAM or CTSH?

Over the past 5 years, ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) delivered a total return of +60. 0%, compared to -77. 3% for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +221. 4% versus TASK's -67. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EXLS or TASK or EPAM or CTSH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus EPAM Systems, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning EPAM is approximately 82% more volatile than EXLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 50% for TaskUs, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EXLS or TASK or EPAM or CTSH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 7. 0% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 3% for EPAM Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXLS leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EXLS or TASK or EPAM or CTSH?

ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus 6. 9% for EPAM Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTSH leads at 16. 7% versus 9. 6% for EPAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXLS leads at 38. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EXLS or TASK or EPAM or CTSH more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TASK: 111. 9% to $13. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EXLS or TASK or EPAM or CTSH?

In this comparison, CTSH (2.

4% yield) pays a dividend. EXLS, TASK, EPAM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is EXLS or TASK or EPAM or CTSH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

75), 2. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTSH: +0. 0%, TASK: -67. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EXLS and TASK and EPAM and CTSH?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; EPAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; CTSH is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CTSH pays a dividend while EXLS, TASK, EPAM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EXLS

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TASK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EPAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CTSH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EXLS and TASK and EPAM and CTSH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EXLS: 13.8% · TASK: 10.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(EXLS: 11.7% · TASK: 8.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(EXLS: 20.4x · TASK: 5.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.