Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FA vs VRSK vs FICO vs IDCC vs OPEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
Software - Application
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
FA vs VRSK vs FICO vs IDCC vs OPEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Consulting Services | Software - Application | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $2.75B | $22.89B | $26.20B | $7.18B | $4.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.61B | $3.10B | $2.26B | $829M | $3.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $910M | $760M | $366M | $-1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 29.3% | 67.4% | 84.2% | 83.4% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 44.9% | 50.4% | 49.6% | -9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 22.9x | 26.2x | 38.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $5.04B | $3.07B | $506M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $240M | $2.18B | $134M | $739M | $962M |
FA vs VRSK vs FICO vs IDCC vs OPEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Advantage Cor… (FA) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
| Verisk Analytics, I… (VRSK) | 100 | 98.4 | -1.6% |
| Fair Isaac Corporat… (FICO) | 100 | 224.0 | +124.0% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 382.9 | +282.9% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 28.3 | -71.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FA vs VRSK vs FICO vs IDCC vs OPEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 83.0%, EPS growth 73.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 2.44x
- 83.0% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
- Lower P/E (13.3x vs 26.2x)
VRSK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 1.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs IDCC's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
FICO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 9.5% 10Y total return vs IDCC's 436.7%
- Beta 0.86 vs OPEN's 3.09
- 39.8% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 59.7% vs -15.8%
IDCC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 0.6%
- PEG 0.74 vs VRSK's 2.68
- Beta 1.12, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.84x
- 44.2% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs FICO's -46.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 83.0% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 26.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.2% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs OPEN's 3.09 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs IDCC's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs FICO's -46.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.8% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 59.7% vs -15.8% |
FA vs VRSK vs FICO vs IDCC vs OPEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FA vs VRSK vs FICO vs IDCC vs OPEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FICO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FA leads 1 • IDCC leads 1 • VRSK leads 1 • OPEN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FICO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 4.8x IDCC's $829M. IDCC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, FICO holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $3.1B | $2.3B | $829M | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $408M | $1.7B | $1.2B | $489M | -$363M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $910M | $760M | $366M | -$1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $219M | $1.1B | $893M | $580M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +67.4% | +84.2% | +83.4% | +7.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +44.9% | +50.4% | +49.6% | -9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +29.3% | +33.7% | +44.2% | -35.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +36.3% | +39.6% | +70.0% | +27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | +3.9% | +38.7% | -2.4% | -37.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +104.2% | +4.8% | +69.0% | -38.0% | -50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.6x trailing earnings, IDCC trades at a 45% valuation discount to FICO's 42.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IDCC offers better value at 0.45x vs VRSK's 3.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $22.9B | $26.2B | $7.2B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $25.7B | $29.1B | $6.9B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -78.80x | 26.92x | 42.57x | 23.62x | -3.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.30x | 22.85x | 26.19x | 38.80x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.16x | 1.55x | 0.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.46x | 15.34x | 31.01x | 12.91x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 7.45x | 13.16x | 8.61x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.08x | 78.44x | — | 8.73x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.50x | 19.20x | 34.03x | 13.58x | 3.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FICO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRSK delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. FA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRSK's 16.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FICO scores 7/9 vs OPEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.7% | +4.4% | — | +33.4% | -163.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +16.7% | +39.8% | +17.7% | -53.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +33.0% | +59.7% | +40.9% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +39.6% | +78.5% | +38.1% | -11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 16.26x | — | 0.46x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$231M | $2.9B | $2.9B | -$233M | -$769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $240M | $2.2B | $134M | $739M | $962M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $5.0B | $3.1B | $506M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.85x | 7.87x | 7.20x | 11.48x | -8.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $40,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,845 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs FICO's -46.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDCC at 52.1% vs VRSK's -5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | -20.7% | -31.3% | -14.1% | -12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.3% | -43.0% | -46.1% | +32.4% | +510.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.7% | -14.5% | +53.4% | +251.7% | +159.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.4% | +1.8% | +127.7% | +303.1% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.4% | +137.1% | +949.1% | +436.7% | -50.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | -5.1% | +15.3% | +52.1% | +37.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FA and VRSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRSK is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FA currently trades 82.9% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | -0.08x | 0.82x | 1.11x | 3.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.01 | $322.92 | $2217.60 | $412.60 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.82 | $161.70 | $870.01 | $205.78 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.9% | +54.1% | +50.9% | +67.6% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 39.5 | 50.9 | 30.8 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.9M | 371K | 393K | 36.3M |
Analyst Outlook
VRSK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FA as "Buy", VRSK as "Hold", FICO as "Buy", IDCC as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.5% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs 4.7% for FA (target: $17). For income investors, VRSK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.03% vs IDCC's 0.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.50 | $231.25 | $1593.56 | $425.00 | $6.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 25 | 18 | 16 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +1.0% | — | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 0 | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | $1.81 | — | $1.76 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | +5.4% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
FICO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FA vs VRSK vs FICO vs IDCC vs OPEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FA or VRSK or FICO or IDCC or OPEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Advantage Corporation (FA) is the stronger pick with 83.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (38. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Advantage Corporation (FA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FA or VRSK or FICO or IDCC or OPEN?
On trailing P/E, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the cheapest at 23. 6x versus Fair Isaac Corporation at 42. 6x. On forward P/E, First Advantage Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: InterDigital, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. 's 2. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FA or VRSK or FICO or IDCC or OPEN?
Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) delivered a total return of +303. 1%, compared to -71. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FICO returned +945. 7% versus OPEN's -53. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FA or VRSK or FICO or IDCC or OPEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning OPEN is approximately -3727% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Advantage Corporation (FA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FA or VRSK or FICO or IDCC or OPEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Advantage Corporation (FA) is pulling ahead at 83.
0% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Advantage Corporation grew EPS 73. 0% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FA leads at 24. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FA or VRSK or FICO or IDCC or OPEN?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FICO leads at 82. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FA or VRSK or FICO or IDCC or OPEN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. 's 2. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Advantage Corporation (FA) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for InterDigital, Inc. — 25. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52. 5% to $425. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FA or VRSK or FICO or IDCC or OPEN?
In this comparison, VRSK (1.
0% yield), IDCC (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. FA, FICO, OPEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FA or VRSK or FICO or IDCC or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 1. 0% yield, +133. 5% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +133. 5%, OPEN: -53. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FA and VRSK and FICO and IDCC and OPEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (FA (Industrials) and VRSK (Industrials) and FICO (Technology) and IDCC (Technology) and OPEN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FA is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRSK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FICO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. VRSK, IDCC pay a dividend while FA, FICO, OPEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.