Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FAF vs MTG vs FNF vs RDN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Specialty
Insurance - Specialty
Insurance - Specialty
FAF vs MTG vs FNF vs RDN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $7.00B | $5.55B | $13.87B | $4.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.01B | $1.20B | $13.72B | $1.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $673M | $718M | $1.17B | $576M |
| Gross Margin | 74.3% | 93.6% | 53.3% | 92.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.8% | 75.4% | 11.6% | 59.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 8.6x | 8.9x | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.91B | $646M | $4.71B | $2.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.39B | $376M | $3.41B | $39M |
FAF vs MTG vs FNF vs RDN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Fina… (FAF) | 100 | 138.6 | +38.6% |
| MGIC Investment Cor… (MTG) | 100 | 321.6 | +221.6% |
| Fidelity National F… (FNF) | 100 | 167.3 | +67.3% |
| Radian Group Inc. (RDN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FAF vs MTG vs FNF vs RDN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FAF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 376.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- 21.6% revenue growth vs MTG's 0.5%
- +14.7% vs FNF's -17.6%
MTG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 324.6% 10Y total return vs RDN's 230.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 12.6%
- PEG 0.44 vs FNF's 2.24
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 10.9x)
FNF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.8% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs FAF's 3.1%
RDN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.37, yield 2.8%, current ratio 42.96x
- Beta 0.37 vs FAF's 0.59
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% revenue growth vs MTG's 0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.2 vs FAF's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs FAF's 0.59 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs FAF's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.7% vs FNF's -17.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs FNF's 1.1%, ROIC 12.7% vs 13.7% |
FAF vs MTG vs FNF vs RDN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FAF vs MTG vs FNF vs RDN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTG leads in 4 of 6 categories
FAF leads 0 • FNF leads 0 • RDN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FNF is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.7B annually — 11.4x MTG's $1.2B. MTG is the more profitable business, keeping 59.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNF's 8.5%. On growth, FNF holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.0B | $1.2B | $13.7B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $913M | $2.4B | $821M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $673M | $718M | $1.2B | $576M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $824M | $705M | $5.7B | -$560M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.3% | +93.6% | +53.3% | +92.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +75.4% | +11.6% | +59.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +59.6% | +8.5% | +45.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +58.5% | +41.4% | -44.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -90.9% | -3.0% | +11.9% | -2.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.4% | +1.3% | +37.1% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MTG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, MTG trades at a 27% valuation discount to FAF's 11.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MTG offers better value at 0.43x vs FNF's 2.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.0B | $5.5B | $13.9B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $5.8B | $15.2B | $7.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.40x | 8.36x | 11.01x | 9.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.90x | 8.58x | 8.87x | 7.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.43x | 2.78x | 2.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.21x | 6.22x | 6.11x | 8.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 4.57x | 1.04x | 3.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 1.15x | 1.64x | 1.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.17x | 6.52x | 2.08x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MTG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTG delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $12 for RDN. MTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FNF's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FAF scores 8/9 vs RDN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +14.0% | +12.5% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +11.0% | +1.1% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | +12.7% | +13.7% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +14.1% | +2.0% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.13x | 0.55x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $519M | $271M | $1.3B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $376M | $3.4B | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $646M | $4.7B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.45x | 27.10x | 7.66x | 9.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTG five years ago would be worth $19,005 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,096 for FAF. Over the past 12 months, FAF leads with a +14.7% total return vs FNF's -17.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTG at 23.4% vs FAF's 8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | -9.5% | -4.8% | -0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.7% | +3.0% | -17.6% | +8.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.4% | +88.0% | +67.0% | +55.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.0% | +90.0% | +37.0% | +69.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.3% | +324.6% | +181.8% | +230.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | +23.4% | +18.6% | +15.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FAF and RDN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FAF's 0.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FAF currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs FNF's 78.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.43x | 0.58x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.47 | $29.97 | $65.21 | $38.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.09 | $24.78 | $42.78 | $31.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +87.6% | +78.5% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 37.5 | 57.5 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 944K | 1.8M | 1.9M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FAF and FNF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FAF as "Buy", MTG as "Buy", FNF as "Buy", RDN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.9% upside for FNF (target: $67) vs 12.4% for RDN (target: $40). For income investors, FNF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.81% vs MTG's 2.24%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $83.00 | $30.00 | $67.00 | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 22 | 17 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +2.2% | +3.8% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 7 | 9 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.15 | $0.59 | $1.95 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +14.2% | +0.2% | +4.7% |
MTG leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
FAF vs MTG vs FNF vs RDN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FAF or MTG or FNF or RDN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is the stronger pick with 21.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG). MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First American Financial Corporation (FAF) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FAF or MTG or FNF or RDN?
On trailing P/E, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the cheapest at 8.
4x versus First American Financial Corporation at 11. 4x. On forward P/E, Radian Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: MGIC Investment Corporation wins at 0. 44x versus Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 's 2. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FAF or MTG or FNF or RDN?
Over the past 5 years, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) delivered a total return of +90.
0%, compared to +21. 0% for First American Financial Corporation (FAF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTG returned +336. 2% versus FAF's +141. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FAF or MTG or FNF or RDN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Radian Group Inc.
(RDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus First American Financial Corporation's 0. 59β — meaning FAF is approximately 59% more volatile than RDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 55% for Fidelity National Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FAF or MTG or FNF or RDN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is pulling ahead at 21.
6% versus 0. 5% for MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First American Financial Corporation grew EPS 376. 2% year-over-year, compared to 4. 0% for Radian Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTG leads at 1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FAF or MTG or FNF or RDN?
MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the more profitable company, earning 60.
8% net margin versus 8. 4% for First American Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 60. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTG leads at 76. 5% versus 11. 1% for FAF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FAF leads at 95. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FAF or MTG or FNF or RDN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 's 2. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Radian Group Inc. (RDN) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for First American Financial Corporation — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNF: 30. 9% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FAF or MTG or FNF or RDN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 2% for MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG).
09Is FAF or MTG or FNF or RDN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
43), 2. 2% yield, +336. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTG: +336. 2%, FAF: +141. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FAF and MTG and FNF and RDN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FAF is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FNF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RDN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.