Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FARM vs CBRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
FARM vs CBRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $28M | $687M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $338M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 40.7% | 25.4% |
| Operating Margin | -1.8% | -0.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $53M | $1.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $40M |
FARM vs CBRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM) | 100 | 16.6 | -83.4% |
| Cracker Barrel Old … (CBRL) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FARM vs CBRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FARM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.79
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.79, current ratio 1.20x
CBRL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.4%, EPS growth 12.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
- -45.5% 10Y total return vs FARM's -95.8%
- 0.4% revenue growth vs FARM's 0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.4% revenue growth vs FARM's 0.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.1% margin vs FARM's -5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs CBRL's 1.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -25.6% vs FARM's -28.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.2% ROA vs FARM's -12.3%, ROIC 2.6% vs -1.2% |
FARM vs CBRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FARM vs CBRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBRL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBRL is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 10.0x FARM's $338M. CBRL is the more profitable business, keeping -0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FARM's -5.5%. On growth, FARM holds the edge at -1.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $338M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $120M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.7% | +25.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | -0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | -0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | -7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -94.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FARM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FARM's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CBRL's 9.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $687M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $74M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.88x | 14.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.45x | 9.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 1.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.27x | 11.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBRL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBRL delivers a -0.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-52 for FARM. FARM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBRL's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBRL scores 7/9 vs FARM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.2% | -0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.3% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.23x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $53M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.88x | -0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CBRL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CBRL five years ago would be worth $2,964 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,231 for FARM. Over the past 12 months, CBRL leads with a -25.6% total return vs FARM's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FARM at -21.8% vs CBRL's -27.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.5% | +16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.9% | -25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.2% | -62.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | -70.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | -45.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.8% | -27.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FARM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FARM is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBRL's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FARM currently trades 51.6% from its 52-week high vs CBRL's 42.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.48 | $71.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.21 | $24.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +42.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 283K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CBRL is the only dividend payer here at 3.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $30.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
CBRL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FARM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
FARM vs CBRL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FARM or CBRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
(CBRL) is the stronger pick with 0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM). Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FARM or CBRL?
Over the past 5 years, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
(CBRL) delivered a total return of -70. 4%, compared to -87. 7% for Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRL returned -45. 5% versus FARM's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FARM or CBRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Farmer Bros.
Co. (FARM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning CBRL is approximately 75% more volatile than FARM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 123% versus 2% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FARM or CBRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
(CBRL) is pulling ahead at 0. 4% versus 0. 3% for Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. grew EPS 12. 6% year-over-year, compared to -257. 9% for Farmer Bros. Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FARM leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FARM or CBRL?
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
(CBRL) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 3% net margin versus -4. 2% for Farmer Bros. Co. — meaning it keeps 1. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBRL leads at 1. 6% versus -0. 4% for FARM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FARM leads at 43. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FARM or CBRL?
In this comparison, CBRL (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. FARM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FARM or CBRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
(CBRL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBRL: -45. 5%, FARM: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FARM and CBRL?
These companies operate in different sectors (FARM (Consumer Defensive) and CBRL (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FARM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CBRL is a small-cap deep-value stock. CBRL pays a dividend while FARM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.