Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FBLA vs FXNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FBLA vs FXNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $258M | $253M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 71.9% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 206.1x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $78M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $161M |
FBLA vs FXNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FB Bancorp, Inc. Co… (FBLA) | 100 | 120.5 | +20.5% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 132.0 | +32.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBLA vs FXNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBLA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 24.9%, current ratio 0.46x
- Beta 0.45, yield 0.1%, current ratio 0.46x
- NIM 3.8% vs FXNC's 3.6%
FXNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs FBLA's 19.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs FBLA's -19.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 206.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FBLA's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs FXNC's 0.70 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FBLA's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.9% vs FBLA's +26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FBLA's 0.7% |
FBLA vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FBLA vs FXNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $112M annually — 1.6x FBLA's $70M. FXNC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBLA's 1.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $70M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.9% | +74.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.2% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FXNC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, FXNC trades at a 93% valuation discount to FBLA's 206.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FXNC's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FBLA's 36.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $258M | $253M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $276M | $134M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 206.10x | 14.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 36.65x | 6.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.71x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $0 for FBLA. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FBLA's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FXNC scores 7/9 vs FBLA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.4% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.2% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78M | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.27x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FXNC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FXNC five years ago would be worth $16,866 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,956 for FBLA. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +46.9% total return vs FBLA's +26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FXNC at 28.2% vs FBLA's 6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.8% | +46.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.6% | +110.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.6% | +68.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.6% | +241.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.1% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
FBLA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBLA is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FXNC's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBLA currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs FXNC's 93.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.23 | $29.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.71 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 144K | 80K |
Analyst Outlook
FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FXNC is the only dividend payer here at 2.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.6% | +0.1% |
FXNC leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FBLA leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
FBLA vs FXNC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBLA or FXNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 0% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA). First National Corporation (FXNC) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBLA or FXNC?
On trailing P/E, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the cheapest at 14.
3x versus FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock at 206. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBLA or FXNC?
Over the past 5 years, First National Corporation (FXNC) delivered a total return of +68.
7%, compared to +19. 6% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus FBLA's +19. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBLA or FXNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FB Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock (FBLA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus First National Corporation's 0. 70β — meaning FXNC is approximately 56% more volatile than FBLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 25% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBLA or FXNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -19. 0% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 118. 6% year-over-year, compared to 96. 0% for First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBLA or FXNC?
First National Corporation (FXNC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus 1. 8% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FXNC leads at 19. 6% versus 6. 9% for FBLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FBLA or FXNC?
In this comparison, FXNC (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FBLA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FBLA or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 2. 2% yield, +241. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FXNC: +241. 1%, FBLA: +19. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FBLA and FXNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. FXNC pays a dividend while FBLA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.