Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FBLA vs FXNC vs CZWI vs BSVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FBLA vs FXNC vs CZWI vs BSVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $250M | $253M | $206M | $414M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70M | $112M | $90M | $137M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $18M | $14M | $43M |
| Gross Margin | 71.9% | 74.0% | 54.7% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 19.6% | 7.0% | 41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 205.7x | 11.9x | 11.8x | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $78M | $43M | $52M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $161M | $119M | $245M |
FBLA vs FXNC vs CZWI vs BSVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FB Bancorp, Inc. Co… (FBLA) | 100 | 120.2 | +20.2% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 132.0 | +32.0% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 151.5 | +51.5% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 104.3 | +4.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBLA vs FXNC vs CZWI vs BSVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBLA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 24.9%, current ratio 0.46x
- Beta 0.43 vs BSVN's 0.82
FXNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 161.7%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs FBLA's -19.0%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.45, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- +46.0% vs BSVN's +18.6%
BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.58 vs FXNC's 7.95
- NIM 4.5% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.58 vs 2.32
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FBLA's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs FBLA's -19.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.58 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FBLA's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs BSVN's 0.82 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.0% vs BSVN's +18.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FBLA's 0.7% |
FBLA vs FXNC vs CZWI vs BSVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FBLA vs FXNC vs CZWI vs BSVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 3 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • FBLA leads 1 • FXNC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN is the larger business by revenue, generating $137M annually — 2.0x FBLA's $70M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBLA's 1.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $70M | $112M | $90M | $137M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $25M | $9M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $18M | $14M | $43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $21M | $11M | $36M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.9% | +74.0% | +54.7% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +19.6% | +7.0% | +41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +15.8% | +16.0% | +31.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +18.7% | +11.5% | +33.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.2% | +7.1% | +63.0% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BSVN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 95% valuation discount to FBLA's 205.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.57x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $250M | $253M | $206M | $414M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $268M | $134M | $139M | $169M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 205.67x | 14.27x | 14.66x | 9.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.87x | 11.76x | 9.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.55x | 2.89x | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.63x | 6.13x | 15.63x | 2.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.60x | 2.25x | 2.29x | 3.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 1.35x | 1.11x | 1.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.03x | 19.85x | 8.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $0 for FBLA. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FXNC scores 7/9 vs BSVN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.4% | +10.0% | +7.8% | +18.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +0.9% | +0.8% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +7.7% | +2.0% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.2% | +9.9% | +0.6% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.23x | 0.28x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | -$118M | -$67M | -$245M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $161M | $119M | $245M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78M | $43M | $52M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.27x | 0.84x | 0.16x | 1.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $27,971 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,931 for FBLA. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +46.0% total return vs BSVN's +18.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 38.4% vs FBLA's 6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +14.6% | +24.0% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.2% | +45.5% | +46.0% | +18.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.3% | +110.8% | +165.0% | +96.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.3% | +69.2% | +73.0% | +179.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.3% | +241.1% | +161.7% | +155.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.1% | +28.2% | +38.4% | +25.3% |
Risk & Volatility
FBLA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBLA is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BSVN's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBLA currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs BSVN's 87.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.68x | 0.45x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.23 | $29.85 | $22.62 | $50.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.71 | $18.31 | $12.83 | $36.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.4% | +93.7% | +94.6% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 52.1 | 64.4 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 80K | 40K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FXNC and BSVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FXNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", BSVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.3% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs -24.9% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, BSVN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.23% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 | — | $57.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% | +1.7% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.61 | $0.37 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.9% | +0.1% | +3.0% | +0.3% |
BSVN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
FBLA vs FXNC vs CZWI vs BSVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBLA or FXNC or CZWI or BSVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 0% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBLA or FXNC or CZWI or BSVN?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock at 205. 7x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 58x versus First National Corporation's 7. 95x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBLA or FXNC or CZWI or BSVN?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +179. 7%, compared to +19. 3% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus FBLA's +19. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBLA or FXNC or CZWI or BSVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FB Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock (FBLA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Bank7 Corp. 's 0. 82β — meaning BSVN is approximately 90% more volatile than FBLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBLA or FXNC or CZWI or BSVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -19. 0% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 118. 6% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBLA or FXNC or CZWI or BSVN?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 1. 8% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 6. 9% for FBLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBLA or FXNC or CZWI or BSVN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus First National Corporation's 7. 95x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for First National Corporation — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 30. 3% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBLA or FXNC or CZWI or BSVN?
In this comparison, BSVN (2.
2% yield), FXNC (2. 2% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. FBLA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FBLA or FXNC or CZWI or BSVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 7% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +161. 7%, FBLA: +19. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBLA and FXNC and CZWI and BSVN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock. FXNC, CZWI, BSVN pay a dividend while FBLA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.