Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FCBC vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FCBC vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $825M | $6.06B | $2.35B | $4.13B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $185M | $1.82B | $867M | $1.89B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $49M | $465M | $169M | $392M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 90.3% | 65.4% | 72.1% | 67.4% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 34.0% | 32.4% | 25.3% | 25.7% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 12.0x | 10.8x | 10.6x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $921M | $327M | $1.30B | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $512M | $2.54B | $185M | $271M | $668M |
FCBC vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Community Ban… (FCBC) | 100 | 202.4 | +102.4% |
| United Bankshares, … (UBSI) | 100 | 149.3 | +49.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 191.3 | +91.3% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCBC vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCBC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 7.6%
- 166.8% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.73x
- Beta 0.66, yield 7.6%, current ratio 0.73x
UBSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 18.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FCBC's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FCBC's 0.6%
Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.76 vs FCBC's 2.66
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.76 vs 1.42
TRMK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth and momentum.
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0%
- +32.5% vs NBTB's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.76 vs 1.42 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FCBC's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.6% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FCBC's 0.6% |
FCBC vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FCBC vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FCBC leads in 3 of 6 categories
FULT leads 1 • UBSI leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • TRMK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCBC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 10.2x FCBC's $185M. FCBC is the more profitable business, keeping 26.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBTB's 19.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $185M | $1.8B | $867M | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $67M | $590M | $241M | $529M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $49M | $465M | $169M | $392M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | $487M | $225M | $267M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.3% | +65.4% | +72.1% | +67.4% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +32.4% | +25.3% | +25.7% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +25.5% | +19.5% | +20.7% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +26.4% | +25.2% | +15.0% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +30.0% | +39.5% | +47.2% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
FULT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 37% valuation discount to FCBC's 16.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.74x vs FCBC's 2.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $825M | $6.1B | $2.4B | $4.1B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $314M | $4.4B | $2.5B | $5.2B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.32x | 13.28x | 13.53x | 10.31x | 12.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.86x | 11.99x | 10.80x | 10.61x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.93x | 2.08x | 1.92x | 0.74x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.97x | 7.53x | 10.35x | 9.74x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.45x | 3.33x | 2.71x | 2.18x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 1.11x | 1.21x | 1.13x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.75x | 12.60x | 10.75x | 14.52x | 11.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FULT delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for UBSI. FCBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCBC scores 7/9 vs FULT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +8.6% | +9.5% | +11.6% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +7.2% | +7.9% | +7.5% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +3.0% | +2.4% | +9.5% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.17x | 0.17x | 0.37x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$511M | -$1.6B | $142M | $1.0B | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $512M | $2.5B | $185M | $271M | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $921M | $327M | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.52x | 1.01x | 1.05x | 0.84x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FCBC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FCBC five years ago would be worth $16,842 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,368 for UBSI. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 32.1% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.0% | +14.1% | +9.3% | +11.1% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.5% | +28.2% | +9.0% | +29.6% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.1% | +61.7% | +54.1% | +130.4% | +118.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.4% | +23.7% | +29.9% | +41.4% | +47.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.8% | +52.4% | +102.2% | +106.1% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.3% | +17.4% | +15.5% | +32.1% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FCBC and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs FULT's 93.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.95x | 0.89x | 1.13x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.10 | $45.93 | $46.92 | $22.99 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.21 | $34.10 | $39.20 | $16.60 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +94.5% | +96.1% | +93.3% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56 | 55.1 | 57.3 | 55.8 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80K | 916K | 236K | 2.0M | 392K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FCBC and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FCBC as "Hold", UBSI as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for FULT (target: $24) vs -12.1% for FCBC (target: $38). For income investors, FCBC offers the higher dividend yield at 7.61% vs TRMK's 2.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $46.67 | $46.00 | $24.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 11 | 10 | 20 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.6% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +3.6% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 5 | 12 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.29 | $1.48 | $1.43 | $0.77 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +2.1% | +0.4% | +1.6% | +3.0% |
FCBC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FULT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FCBC vs UBSI vs NBTB vs FULT vs TRMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCBC or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCBC or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus First Community Bankshares, Inc. at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus First Community Bankshares, Inc. 's 2. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCBC or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) delivered a total return of +68. 4%, compared to +23. 7% for United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCBC returned +166. 8% versus UBSI's +52. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCBC or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning FULT is approximately 70% more volatile than FCBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCBC or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for First Community Bankshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCBC or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCBC leads at 34. 0% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCBC leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCBC or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus First Community Bankshares, Inc. 's 2. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for First Community Bankshares, Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FULT: 11. 9% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCBC or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or TRMK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC) offers the highest yield at 7. 6%, versus 2. 2% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK).
09Is FCBC or UBSI or NBTB or FULT or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 7. 6% yield, +166. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCBC: +166. 8%, FULT: +106. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCBC and UBSI and NBTB and FULT and TRMK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FCBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; UBSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.