Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FCRX vs ARCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
FCRX vs ARCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $930M | $13.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $197M | $3.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $1.15B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 75.7% |
| Operating Margin | 77.7% | 69.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $876M | $15.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $924M |
FCRX vs ARCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crescent Capital BD… (FCRX) | 100 | 98.5 | -1.5% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 98.4 | -1.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCRX vs ARCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCRX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 8.1%
- 8.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs ARCC's 2.0%
- +6.6% vs ARCC's +1.9%
ARCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -23.8%
- 139.7% 10Y total return vs FCRX's 22.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, current ratio 1.71x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs FCRX's 7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 15.1x), PEG 0.97 vs 4.54 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs FCRX's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs FCRX's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs ARCC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.6% vs ARCC's +1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs FCRX's 0.2% |
FCRX vs ARCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCRX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 15.9x FCRX's $197M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 41.3% (ARCC) to 37.3% (FCRX).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $197M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $0 | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +75.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +69.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +41.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.9% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.7% | -63.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ARCC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, ARCC trades at a 18% valuation discount to FCRX's 12.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ARCC offers better value at 1.00x vs FCRX's 3.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $930M | $13.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $28.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.61x | 10.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.07x | 10.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.80x | 1.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.71x | 4.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.24x | 12.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCRX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARCC delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $5 for FCRX. ARCC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FCRX's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCRX scores 5/9 vs ARCC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | 1.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $866M | $15.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $924M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $876M | $16.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.34x | 2.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARCC five years ago would be worth $14,948 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,220 for FCRX. Over the past 12 months, FCRX leads with a +6.6% total return vs ARCC's +1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARCC at 10.6% vs FCRX's 6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.6% | +1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.0% | +35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.2% | +49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.2% | +139.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FCRX and ARCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FCRX's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCRX currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs ARCC's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.20 | $23.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $17.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
FCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FCRX as "Buy" and ARCC as "Buy". For income investors, FCRX offers the higher dividend yield at 8.09% vs ARCC's 2.00%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.1% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.03 | $0.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FCRX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARCC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FCRX vs ARCC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCRX or ARCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger pick with 32.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX). Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCRX or ARCC?
On trailing P/E, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. at 12. 6x. On forward P/E, Ares Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ares Capital Corporation wins at 0. 97x versus Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. 's 4. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCRX or ARCC?
Over the past 5 years, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) delivered a total return of +49.
5%, compared to +22. 2% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCC returned +139. 7% versus FCRX's +22. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCRX or ARCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
77β versus Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning FCRX is approximately 58% more volatile than ARCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 112% versus 118% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCRX or ARCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is pulling ahead at 32.
9% versus 7. 2% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. grew EPS -14. 6% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCRX or ARCC?
Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
3% net margin versus 37. 3% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCRX leads at 77. 7% versus 69. 7% for ARCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCRX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCRX or ARCC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. 's 4. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 1x for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCRX or ARCC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX) offers the highest yield at 8. 1%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is FCRX or ARCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
77), 2. 0% yield, +139. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARCC: +139. 7%, FCRX: +22. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCRX and ARCC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FCRX is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.