Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FCRX vs BX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
FCRX vs BX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $930M | $97.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $197M | $13.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $3.02B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 77.7% | 51.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $876M | $13.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $2.63B |
FCRX vs BX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crescent Capital BD… (FCRX) | 100 | 98.5 | -1.5% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 132.0 | +32.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCRX vs BX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 8.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, current ratio 1.44x
- Beta 1.21, yield 8.1%, current ratio 1.44x
BX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
- 487.1% 10Y total return vs FCRX's 22.2%
- PEG 0.98 vs FCRX's 4.54
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs FCRX's 7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 20.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BX's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs BX's 1.53 | |
| Dividends | 8.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs BX's 6.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.6% vs BX's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BX's 0.3% |
FCRX vs BX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FCRX vs BX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCRX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.8B annually — 70.1x FCRX's $197M. FCRX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BX's 21.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $197M | $13.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $0 | $7.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +86.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +51.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.9% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.7% | +41.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FCRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, FCRX trades at a 61% valuation discount to BX's 32.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BX offers better value at 1.54x vs FCRX's 3.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $930M | $97.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $108.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.61x | 32.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.07x | 20.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.80x | 1.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.71x | 7.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 4.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.24x | 55.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BX leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $5 for FCRX. BX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FCRX's 1.18x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $866M | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $876M | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.34x | 14.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BX five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,220 for FCRX. Over the past 12 months, FCRX leads with a +6.6% total return vs BX's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BX at 19.1% vs FCRX's 6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.6% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.0% | +68.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.2% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.2% | +487.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | +19.1% |
Risk & Volatility
FCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCRX is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BX's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCRX currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs BX's 65.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.20 | $190.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $101.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +65.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 51.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 7.2M |
Analyst Outlook
FCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FCRX as "Buy" and BX as "Buy". For income investors, FCRX offers the higher dividend yield at 8.09% vs BX's 6.18%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $156.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.1% | +6.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.03 | $7.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
FCRX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
FCRX vs BX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCRX or BX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX). Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCRX or BX?
On trailing P/E, Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.
(FCRX) is the cheapest at 12. 6x versus Blackstone Inc. at 32. 1x. On forward P/E, Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Blackstone Inc. wins at 0. 98x versus Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. 's 4. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCRX or BX?
Over the past 5 years, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to +22. 2% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BX returned +476. 1% versus FCRX's +22. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCRX or BX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.
(FCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Blackstone Inc. 's 1. 53β — meaning BX is approximately 26% more volatile than FCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blackstone Inc. (BX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 118% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCRX or BX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus 7. 2% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Inc. grew EPS 7. 2% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCRX or BX?
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.
(FCRX) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus 21. 8% for Blackstone Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCRX leads at 77. 7% versus 51. 9% for BX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCRX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCRX or BX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Blackstone Inc. (BX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. 's 4. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Blackstone Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCRX or BX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX) offers the highest yield at 8. 1%, versus 6. 2% for Blackstone Inc. (BX).
09Is FCRX or BX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6. 2% yield, +476. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BX: +476. 1%, FCRX: +22. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCRX and BX?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FCRX is a small-cap deep-value stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.