Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FCUV
Focus Universal Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$802K
5Y Perf.-99.6%
SMSI
Smith Micro Software, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-98.3%
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited

Security & Protection Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-99.5%
CALX
Calix, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.81B
5Y Perf.+43.2%
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$898M
5Y Perf.-58.4%

FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FCUV logoFCUV
SMSI logoSMSI
GFAI logoGFAI
CALX logoCALX
SHEN logoSHEN
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsSoftware - ApplicationSecurity & Protection ServicesSoftware - ApplicationTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$802K$17M$10M$2.81B$898M
Revenue (TTM)$387K$17M$72M$1.06B$266M
Net Income (TTM)$-6M$-28M$-24M$34M$-36M
Gross Margin-28.5%75.5%15.1%57.1%37.9%
Operating Margin-15.5%-154.8%-27.4%3.8%-10.3%
Forward P/E24.3x
Total Debt$115K$2M$3M$26M$642M
Cash & Equiv.$4M$1M$22M$143M$27M

FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHENLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FCUV
SMSI
GFAI
CALX
SHEN
StockJan 21May 26Return
Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV)1000.4-99.6%
Smith Micro Softwar… (SMSI)1001.7-98.3%
Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI)1000.5-99.5%
Calix, Inc. (CALX)100143.2+43.2%
Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN)10041.6-58.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CALX leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Shenandoah Telecommunications Company is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. SMSI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FCUV
Focus Universal Inc.
The Technology Pick

FCUV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
SMSI
Smith Micro Software, Inc.
The Income Pick

SMSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 4.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: dividends
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
CALX
Calix, Inc.
The Growth Play

CALX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
  • 5.1% 10Y total return vs SHEN's 21.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 4.24x
  • 20.3% revenue growth vs SMSI's -15.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
The Income Pick

SHEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
  • Beta 0.89, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.90x
  • Beta 0.89 vs GFAI's 2.31
  • +41.3% vs FCUV's -97.6%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCALX logoCALX20.3% revenue growth vs SMSI's -15.5%
Quality / MarginsCALX logoCALX3.2% margin vs FCUV's -15.2%
Stability / SafetySHEN logoSHENBeta 0.89 vs GFAI's 2.31
DividendsSMSI logoSMSI4.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SHEN logoSHEN+41.3% vs FCUV's -97.6%
Efficiency (ROA)CALX logoCALX3.5% ROA vs FCUV's -253.0%, ROIC 2.1% vs -229.8%

FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FCUVFocus Universal Inc.
FY 2023
Revenue
93.8%$986,655
Revenue Related Party
6.2%$65,543
SMSISmith Micro Software, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
100.0%$3M
GFAIGuardforce AI Co., Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

CALXCalix, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.0B
SHENShenandoah Telecommunications Company
FY 2025
Service
100.0%$351M

FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCALXLAGGINGGFAI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CALX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CALX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 2735.1x FCUV's $387,457. CALX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCUV's -15.2%. On growth, CALX holds the edge at +27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFCUV logoFCUVFocus Universal I…SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$387,457$17M$72M$1.1B$266M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M-$21M-$12M$57M$104M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$6M-$28M-$24M$34M-$36M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M-$10M-$6M$109M-$276M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-28.5%+75.5%+15.1%+57.1%+37.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.5%-154.8%-27.4%+3.8%-10.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-15.2%-165.4%-32.9%+3.2%-13.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.2%-61.3%-8.8%+10.3%-103.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-61.3%-8.7%+3.6%+27.1%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-180.0%+64.3%+38.9%+3.3%-18.2%
CALX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GFAI and SHEN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, SHEN's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALX's 69.6x.

MetricFCUV logoFCUVFocus Universal I…SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
Market CapShares × price$801,964$17M$10M$2.8B$898M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$3M$18M-$9M$2.7B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.23x-0.58x-0.89x167.38x-22.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple69.62x13.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.01x1.00x0.28x2.81x2.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.23x0.94x0.16x3.57x0.92x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.34x
Evenly matched — GFAI and SHEN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CALX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

CALX delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FCUV. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHEN's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFCUV logoFCUVFocus Universal I…SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.9%-141.9%-69.7%+4.2%-3.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.5%-104.4%-50.2%+3.5%-2.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.3%-48.3%-41.6%+2.1%-1.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-180.2%-62.8%-19.1%+2.5%-1.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933663
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.13x0.08x0.03x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M$844,000-$19M-$118M$614M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$1M$22M$143M$27M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$114,820$2M$3M$26M$642M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-69.59x-7.39x-167.24x-0.65x
CALX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CALX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CALX five years ago would be worth $9,067 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for FCUV. Over the past 12 months, SHEN leads with a +41.3% total return vs FCUV's -97.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CALX at 0.7% vs FCUV's -82.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFCUV logoFCUVFocus Universal I…SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-87.2%+53.2%-26.3%-18.8%+43.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.6%-19.8%-53.2%+3.3%+41.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%-91.9%-93.8%+2.1%-13.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%-97.9%-99.5%-9.3%-27.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.9%-96.5%-99.5%+513.0%+21.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-82.5%-56.7%-60.4%+0.7%-4.8%
CALX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SHEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs FCUV's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFCUV logoFCUVFocus Universal I…SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.55x1.42x2.36x0.98x0.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$53.70$1.30$1.50$71.22$17.34
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.74$0.43$0.38$40.75$9.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.0%+64.8%+31.5%+61.1%+93.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10030.366.747.043.355.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M310K378K918K300K
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SMSI and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CALX as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs 40.2% for CALX (target: $61). For income investors, SMSI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.43% vs SHEN's 0.72%.

MetricFCUV logoFCUVFocus Universal I…SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…GFAI logoGFAIGuardforce AI Co.…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$61.00$29.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts218
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.4%+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises113
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04$0.12
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+83.5%0.0%0.0%+3.3%0.0%
Evenly matched — SMSI and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CALX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHEN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallCalix, Inc. (CALX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Calix, Inc.

(CALX) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). Calix, Inc. (CALX) offers the better valuation at 167. 4x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Calix, Inc. (CALX) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN?

Over the past 5 years, Calix, Inc.

(CALX) delivered a total return of -9. 3%, compared to -99. 7% for Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALX returned +509. 0% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

87β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 36β — meaning GFAI is approximately 170% more volatile than SHEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 66% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Calix, Inc.

(CALX) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus -15. 5% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN?

Calix, Inc.

(CALX) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -803. 8% for Focus Universal Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CALX leads at 2. 1% versus -1557. 3% for FCUV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMSI leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78.

7% to $29. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN?

In this comparison, SMSI (4.

4% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. FCUV, GFAI, CALX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

87), 0. 7% yield). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEN: +21. 4%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FCUV and SMSI and GFAI and CALX and SHEN?

These companies operate in different sectors (FCUV (Technology) and SMSI (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and CALX (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FCUV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMSI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SMSI, SHEN pay a dividend while FCUV, GFAI, CALX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FCUV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SMSI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 45%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GFAI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CALX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHEN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FCUV and SMSI and GFAI and CALX and SHEN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FCUV: -61.3% · SMSI: -8.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.