Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Security & Protection Services
Software - Application
Telecommunications Services
FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Software - Application | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $802K | $17M | $10M | $2.81B | $898M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $387K | $17M | $72M | $1.06B | $266M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-28M | $-24M | $34M | $-36M |
| Gross Margin | -28.5% | 75.5% | 15.1% | 57.1% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -15.5% | -154.8% | -27.4% | 3.8% | -10.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 24.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $115K | $2M | $3M | $26M | $642M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $1M | $22M | $143M | $27M |
FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Smith Micro Softwar… (SMSI) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 143.2 | +43.2% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 41.6 | -58.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCUV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SMSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CALX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs SHEN's 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 4.24x
- 20.3% revenue growth vs SMSI's -15.5%
SHEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.90x
- Beta 0.89 vs GFAI's 2.31
- +41.3% vs FCUV's -97.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs SMSI's -15.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs FCUV's -15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs GFAI's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.3% vs FCUV's -97.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs FCUV's -253.0%, ROIC 2.1% vs -229.8% |
FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CALX leads in 3 of 6 categories
SHEN leads 1 • FCUV leads 0 • SMSI leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CALX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CALX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 2735.1x FCUV's $387,457. CALX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCUV's -15.2%. On growth, CALX holds the edge at +27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $387,457 | $17M | $72M | $1.1B | $266M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$21M | -$12M | $57M | $104M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$28M | -$24M | $34M | -$36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$10M | -$6M | $109M | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -28.5% | +75.5% | +15.1% | +57.1% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.5% | -154.8% | -27.4% | +3.8% | -10.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.2% | -165.4% | -32.9% | +3.2% | -13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.2% | -61.3% | -8.8% | +10.3% | -103.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.3% | -8.7% | +3.6% | +27.1% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -180.0% | +64.3% | +38.9% | +3.3% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GFAI and SHEN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SHEN's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALX's 69.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $801,964 | $17M | $10M | $2.8B | $898M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3M | $18M | -$9M | $2.7B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.23x | -0.58x | -0.89x | 167.38x | -22.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 24.33x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 69.62x | 13.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.01x | 1.00x | 0.28x | 2.81x | 2.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 0.94x | 0.16x | 3.57x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 24.34x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CALX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CALX delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FCUV. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHEN's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | -141.9% | -69.7% | +4.2% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | -104.4% | -50.2% | +3.5% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | -48.3% | -41.6% | +2.1% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -180.2% | -62.8% | -19.1% | +2.5% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.13x | 0.08x | 0.03x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $844,000 | -$19M | -$118M | $614M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $1M | $22M | $143M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $114,820 | $2M | $3M | $26M | $642M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -69.59x | -7.39x | -167.24x | — | -0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CALX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CALX five years ago would be worth $9,067 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for FCUV. Over the past 12 months, SHEN leads with a +41.3% total return vs FCUV's -97.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CALX at 0.7% vs FCUV's -82.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -87.2% | +53.2% | -26.3% | -18.8% | +43.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.6% | -19.8% | -53.2% | +3.3% | +41.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -91.9% | -93.8% | +2.1% | -13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -97.9% | -99.5% | -9.3% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -96.5% | -99.5% | +513.0% | +21.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -82.5% | -56.7% | -60.4% | +0.7% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs FCUV's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 1.42x | 2.36x | 0.98x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.70 | $1.30 | $1.50 | $71.22 | $17.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $0.43 | $0.38 | $40.75 | $9.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.0% | +64.8% | +31.5% | +61.1% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.3 | 66.7 | 47.0 | 43.3 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 310K | 378K | 918K | 300K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SMSI and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CALX as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs 40.2% for CALX (target: $61). For income investors, SMSI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.43% vs SHEN's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $61.00 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 21 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.4% | — | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +83.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.3% | 0.0% |
CALX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHEN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
FCUV vs SMSI vs GFAI vs CALX vs SHEN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). Calix, Inc. (CALX) offers the better valuation at 167. 4x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Calix, Inc. (CALX) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN?
Over the past 5 years, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) delivered a total return of -9. 3%, compared to -99. 7% for Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALX returned +509. 0% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 36β — meaning GFAI is approximately 170% more volatile than SHEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 66% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus -15. 5% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN?
Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -803. 8% for Focus Universal Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CALX leads at 2. 1% versus -1557. 3% for FCUV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMSI leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78.
7% to $29. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN?
In this comparison, SMSI (4.
4% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. FCUV, GFAI, CALX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FCUV or SMSI or GFAI or CALX or SHEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87), 0. 7% yield). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEN: +21. 4%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FCUV and SMSI and GFAI and CALX and SHEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (FCUV (Technology) and SMSI (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and CALX (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FCUV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMSI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SMSI, SHEN pay a dividend while FCUV, GFAI, CALX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.