Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FCX vs HBM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$87.51B
5Y Perf.+571.3%
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$9.52B
5Y Perf.+788.9%

FCX vs HBM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FCX logoFCX
HBM logoHBM
IndustryCopperCopper
Market Cap$87.51B$9.52B
Revenue (TTM)$26.42B$2.22B
Net Income (TTM)$2.73B$570M
Gross Margin27.8%32.5%
Operating Margin27.8%41.4%
Forward P/E22.5x15.4x
Total Debt$11.50B$1.09B
Cash & Equiv.$3.35B$568M

FCX vs HBMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FCX
HBM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX)100671.3+571.3%
Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM)100888.9+788.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FCX vs HBM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HBM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Freeport-McMoRan Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
The Income Pick

FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.79, yield 1.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 37.4%, current ratio 2.29x
  • Beta 1.79, yield 1.0%, current ratio 2.29x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
The Growth Play

HBM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
  • 490.5% 10Y total return vs FCX's 444.7%
  • 8.9% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHBM logoHBM8.9% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
ValueHBM logoHBMLower P/E (15.4x vs 22.5x)
Quality / MarginsHBM logoHBM25.8% margin vs FCX's 10.3%
Stability / SafetyFCX logoFCXBeta 1.79 vs HBM's 1.91
DividendsFCX logoFCX1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HBM's 0.1%
Momentum (1Y)HBM logoHBM+212.7% vs FCX's +62.2%
Efficiency (ROA)HBM logoHBM9.8% ROA vs FCX's 4.7%, ROIC 12.0% vs 12.8%

FCX vs HBM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc.
FY 2025
Copper Cathode
31.4%$8.1B
Copper In Concentrates
24.3%$6.3B
Refined Copper Products
17.0%$4.4B
Gold
15.0%$3.9B
Molybdenum
7.6%$2.0B
Other Products Or Services
2.9%$749M
Purchased Copper
1.7%$449M
HBMHudbay Minerals Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FCX vs HBM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHBMLAGGINGFCX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HBM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 11.9x HBM's $2.2B. HBM is the more profitable business, keeping 25.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, HBM holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$26.4B$2.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9.6B$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.7B$570M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$6.2B$215M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.8%+32.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.8%+41.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.3%+25.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+23.6%+9.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.2%+26.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+154.2%+5.1%
HBM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HBM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.4x trailing earnings, HBM trades at a 59% valuation discount to FCX's 40.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HBM's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FCX's 11.2x.

MetricFCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
Market CapShares × price$87.5B$9.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$95.7B$10.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS40.06x16.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.51x15.41x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.21x9.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.40x4.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.86x2.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF78.41x48.13x
HBM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HBM leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

HBM delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $9 for FCX. HBM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FCX's 0.37x.

MetricFCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.9%+19.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.7%+9.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.8%+12.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.4%+11.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8.1B$524M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3.4B$568M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11.5B$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense17.68x13.44x
HBM leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HBM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HBM five years ago would be worth $27,864 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,151 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, HBM leads with a +212.7% total return vs FCX's +62.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBM at 65.5% vs FCX's 19.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.8%+19.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+62.2%+212.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+71.5%+353.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+51.5%+178.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+444.7%+490.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.7%+65.5%
HBM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FCX is the less volatile stock with a 1.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBM's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricFCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.79x1.91x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$70.97$28.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.15$7.40
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.8%+83.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.545.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded15.4M5.4M
FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FCX as "Buy" and HBM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for FCX (target: $67) vs -56.9% for HBM (target: $10). FCX is the only dividend payer here at 0.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$67.00$10.34
# AnalystsCovering analysts4120
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises50
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%
FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HBM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FCX leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallHudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FCX vs HBM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FCX or HBM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FCX or HBM?

On trailing P/E, Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) is the cheapest at 16. 4x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 40. 1x. On forward P/E, Hudbay Minerals Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FCX or HBM?

Over the past 5 years, Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) delivered a total return of +178. 6%, compared to +51. 5% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HBM returned +490. 5% versus FCX's +444. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FCX or HBM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

(FCX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 79β versus Hudbay Minerals Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning HBM is approximately 7% more volatile than FCX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 37% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FCX or HBM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc. grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HBM leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FCX or HBM?

Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus 8. 6% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HBM leads at 25. 5% versus 24. 4% for FCX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HBM leads at 29. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FCX or HBM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCX: 10. 0% to $67. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FCX or HBM?

In this comparison, FCX (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. HBM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FCX or HBM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

(FCX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +444. 7% 10Y return). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCX: +444. 7%, HBM: +490. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FCX and HBM?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HBM is a small-cap deep-value stock. FCX pays a dividend while HBM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FCX

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HBM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FCX and HBM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FCX: 12.2% · HBM: 26.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(FCX: 10.3% · HBM: 25.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FCX: 40.1x · HBM: 16.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.