Copper
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs TECK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Industrial Materials
FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs TECK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Copper | Copper | Copper | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $87.11B | $9.46B | $148.31B | $29.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.42B | $2.22B | $13.42B | $12.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.73B | $570M | $4.33B | $1.85B |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 32.5% | 56.7% | 30.3% |
| Operating Margin | 27.8% | 41.4% | 52.2% | 23.9% |
| Forward P/E | 22.4x | 15.3x | 25.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $11.50B | $1.09B | $7.41B | $10.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.35B | $568M | $4.30B | $5.01B |
FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs TECK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 668.2 | +568.2% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) | 100 | 883.3 | +783.3% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 519.7 | +419.7% |
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 640.1 | +540.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs TECK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.75 vs SCCO's 1.22
- Better valuation composite
- 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.7%
HBM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3%
SCCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 1.7%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs TECK's 6.0%
- Beta 1.78, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3.89x
- 32.3% margin vs FCX's 10.3%
TECK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
- 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
- Beta 1.73 vs HBM's 1.91
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs FCX's 10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs HBM's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 38.6% vs 4.4% |
FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs TECK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs TECK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
HBM leads 1 • TECK leads 1 • FCX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 11.9x HBM's $2.2B. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.4B | $2.2B | $13.4B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.6B | $1.4B | $7.9B | $4.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $570M | $4.3B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.2B | $215M | $3.4B | $482M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +32.5% | +56.7% | +30.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +41.4% | +52.2% | +23.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +25.8% | +32.3% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +9.7% | +25.5% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | +26.0% | +39.0% | +72.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +154.2% | +5.1% | +54.5% | +128.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FCX and HBM and TECK each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, HBM trades at a 59% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs SCCO's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $87.1B | $9.5B | $148.3B | $29.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $95.3B | $10.0B | $151.4B | $33.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.88x | 16.34x | 34.26x | 29.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.41x | 15.31x | 25.40x | 12.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.33x | — | 1.64x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.16x | 9.77x | 19.24x | 12.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.38x | 4.30x | 11.05x | 3.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.84x | 2.93x | 13.55x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.05x | 47.82x | 43.28x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $7 for TECK. HBM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs HBM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +19.2% | +42.0% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +9.8% | +21.4% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | +12.0% | +38.6% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +11.3% | +39.2% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.34x | 0.67x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.1B | $524M | $3.1B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.4B | $568M | $4.3B | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.5B | $1.1B | $7.4B | $10.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.68x | 13.44x | 19.33x | 4.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCO five years ago would be worth $26,737 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, HBM leads with a +219.0% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBM at 65.2% vs TECK's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | +18.7% | +21.4% | +26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.3% | +219.0% | +110.5% | +79.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.7% | +350.8% | +151.0% | +40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | +159.2% | +167.4% | +147.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +507.7% | +552.2% | +668.4% | +599.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.5% | +65.2% | +35.9% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TECK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TECK is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBM's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs SCCO's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 1.91x | 1.78x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.97 | $28.74 | $223.89 | $63.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.15 | $7.42 | $85.72 | $30.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.4% | +83.0% | +80.2% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 54.0 | 54.1 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.4M | 5.3M | 1.6M | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FCX and SCCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FCX as "Buy", HBM as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", TECK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.5% upside for FCX (target: $67) vs -56.6% for HBM (target: $10). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs TECK's 0.60%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.00 | $10.34 | $156.40 | $64.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 20 | 30 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +0.1% | +1.7% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.01 | $2.96 | $0.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% |
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HBM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FCX vs HBM vs SCCO vs TECK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCX or HBM or SCCO or TECK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCX or HBM or SCCO or TECK?
On trailing P/E, Hudbay Minerals Inc.
(HBM) is the cheapest at 16. 3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCX or HBM or SCCO or TECK?
Over the past 5 years, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) delivered a total return of +167.
4%, compared to +44. 3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +668. 4% versus FCX's +507. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCX or HBM or SCCO or TECK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Hudbay Minerals Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning HBM is approximately 10% more volatile than TECK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCX or HBM or SCCO or TECK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.
6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc. grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HBM leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCX or HBM or SCCO or TECK?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus 8. 6% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCX or HBM or SCCO or TECK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for Southern Copper Corporation — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCX: 10. 5% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCX or HBM or SCCO or TECK?
In this comparison, SCCO (1.
7% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. HBM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FCX or HBM or SCCO or TECK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield, +668. 4% 10Y return). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCO: +668. 4%, HBM: +552. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCX and HBM and SCCO and TECK?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HBM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. FCX, SCCO, TECK pay a dividend while HBM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.