Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FDP vs DOLE vs CVGW vs AVO vs JBSS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
Packaged Foods
FDP vs DOLE vs CVGW vs AVO vs JBSS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Food Distribution | Food Distribution | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $1.41B | $495M | $942M | $913M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.27B | $9.17B | $616M | $1.34B | $1.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $70M | $51M | $18M | $33M | $70M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 7.8% | 10.2% | 12.0% | 19.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 4.8% | 8.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 10.7x | 19.6x | 20.2x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $475M | $0.00 | $23M | $201M | $102M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $268M | $61M | $65M | $585K |
FDP vs DOLE vs CVGW vs AVO vs JBSS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh Del Monte Pro… (FDP) | 100 | 121.7 | +21.7% |
| Dole plc (DOLE) | 100 | 102.0 | +2.0% |
| Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW) | 100 | 49.2 | -50.8% |
| Mission Produce, In… (AVO) | 100 | 68.7 | -31.3% |
| John B. Sanfilippo … (JBSS) | 100 | 84.6 | -15.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDP vs DOLE vs CVGW vs AVO vs JBSS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 23.4%, current ratio 2.16x
- PEG 0.95 vs JBSS's 7.58
- Beta 0.10, yield 3.2%, current ratio 2.16x
DOLE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CVGW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AVO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth 1.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 12.7% revenue growth vs CVGW's -2.0%
JBSS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 101.1% 10Y total return vs DOLE's 12.0%
- 6.2% margin vs DOLE's 0.6%
- +39.3% vs DOLE's +3.7%
- 11.7% ROA vs DOLE's 1.2%, ROIC 15.2% vs 9.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% revenue growth vs CVGW's -2.0% | |
| Value | PEG 0.95 vs 7.58 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs DOLE's 0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs CVGW's 0.44 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs DOLE's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.3% vs DOLE's +3.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs DOLE's 1.2%, ROIC 15.2% vs 9.3% |
FDP vs DOLE vs CVGW vs AVO vs JBSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FDP vs DOLE vs CVGW vs AVO vs JBSS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JBSS leads in 2 of 6 categories
FDP leads 2 • DOLE leads 0 • CVGW leads 0 • AVO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBSS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOLE is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.2B annually — 14.9x CVGW's $616M. JBSS is the more profitable business, keeping 6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOLE's 0.6%. On growth, DOLE holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $9.2B | $616M | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $216M | $337M | $19M | $91M | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $70M | $51M | $18M | $33M | $70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $177M | -$31M | $15M | $38M | $33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +7.8% | +10.2% | +12.0% | +19.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +2.5% | +2.1% | +4.8% | +8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +0.6% | +2.9% | +2.5% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | -0.3% | +2.4% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.9% | +9.2% | -20.8% | -16.6% | +4.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.2% | +93.2% | -84.0% | -118.2% | +31.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FDP and DOLE each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, JBSS trades at a 44% valuation discount to DOLE's 27.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FDP offers better value at 1.56x vs JBSS's 11.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $1.4B | $495M | $942M | $913M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $1.1B | $457M | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.97x | 27.90x | 24.95x | 25.09x | 15.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.11x | 10.68x | 19.65x | 20.15x | 10.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.56x | — | — | 4.76x | 11.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.59x | 3.43x | 16.88x | 10.16x | 8.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 0.15x | 0.76x | 0.68x | 0.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 1.02x | 2.38x | 1.53x | 2.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.71x | 822.22x | 25.53x | 25.33x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JBSS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBSS delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $3 for FDP. CVGW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVO's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVGW scores 7/9 vs JBSS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.4% | +3.7% | +8.5% | +5.5% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +1.2% | +5.8% | +3.3% | +11.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +9.3% | +8.6% | +7.2% | +15.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +7.8% | +8.5% | +8.6% | +20.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | — | 0.11x | 0.32x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $439M | -$268M | -$38M | $136M | $102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $268M | $61M | $65M | $585,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $475M | $0 | $23M | $201M | $102M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.40x | 3.51x | 42.51x | 10.85x | 26.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FDP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FDP five years ago would be worth $12,169 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,967 for CVGW. Over the past 12 months, JBSS leads with a +39.3% total return vs DOLE's +3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FDP at 13.9% vs JBSS's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.2% | +1.6% | +29.8% | +14.9% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.4% | +3.7% | +10.2% | +29.8% | +39.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +29.6% | -4.1% | +11.6% | -22.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.7% | +12.0% | -60.3% | -33.0% | +4.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | +12.0% | -36.5% | -3.6% | +101.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.9% | +9.0% | -1.4% | +3.7% | -8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FDP and CVGW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FDP is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVGW's 0.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVGW currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs AVO's 85.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.10x | 0.11x | 0.44x | 0.32x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.58 | $16.57 | $28.98 | $15.53 | $85.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.43 | $12.52 | $18.40 | $10.00 | $58.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +89.2% | +95.6% | +85.6% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.0 | 48.1 | 57.5 | 47.3 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 264K | 697K | 284K | 925K | 80K |
Analyst Outlook
FDP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FDP as "Hold", DOLE as "Buy", CVGW as "Buy", AVO as "Buy", JBSS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.9% upside for AVO (target: $19) vs -2.5% for CVGW (target: $27). For income investors, FDP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs DOLE's 2.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $16.67 | $27.00 | $19.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.2% | +2.9% | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $0.33 | $0.80 | — | $2.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.6% | +0.1% |
JBSS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FDP leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
FDP vs DOLE vs CVGW vs AVO vs JBSS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDP or DOLE or CVGW or AVO or JBSS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mission Produce, Inc.
(AVO) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dole plc (DOLE) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDP or DOLE or CVGW or AVO or JBSS?
On trailing P/E, John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Dole plc at 27. 9x. On forward P/E, Dole plc is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. wins at 0. 95x versus John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. 's 7. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDP or DOLE or CVGW or AVO or JBSS?
Over the past 5 years, Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.
(FDP) delivered a total return of +21. 7%, compared to -60. 3% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JBSS returned +101. 1% versus CVGW's -36. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDP or DOLE or CVGW or AVO or JBSS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.
(FDP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus Calavo Growers, Inc. 's 0. 44β — meaning CVGW is approximately 332% more volatile than FDP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 32% for Mission Produce, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDP or DOLE or CVGW or AVO or JBSS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mission Produce, Inc.
(AVO) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -2. 0% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calavo Growers, Inc. grew EPS 1950% year-over-year, compared to -59. 5% for Dole plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVO leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDP or DOLE or CVGW or AVO or JBSS?
John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus 0. 6% for Dole plc — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JBSS leads at 7. 7% versus 2. 4% for DOLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JBSS leads at 18. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDP or DOLE or CVGW or AVO or JBSS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. (FDP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 95x versus John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. 's 7. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Dole plc (DOLE) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Mission Produce, Inc. — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVO: 42. 9% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDP or DOLE or CVGW or AVO or JBSS?
In this comparison, FDP (3.
2% yield), CVGW (2. 9% yield), JBSS (2. 7% yield), DOLE (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AVO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FDP or DOLE or CVGW or AVO or JBSS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dole plc (DOLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
11), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOLE: +12. 0%, AVO: -3. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDP and DOLE and CVGW and AVO and JBSS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DOLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVGW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JBSS is a small-cap deep-value stock. FDP, DOLE, CVGW, JBSS pay a dividend while AVO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.