Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FDP vs JBSS vs FRPT vs SENEA vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
FDP vs JBSS vs FRPT vs SENEA vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $913M | $2.74B | $730M | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.27B | $1.14B | $1.14B | $1.61B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $70M | $70M | $200M | $90M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 19.1% | 38.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | 8.9% | 8.8% | 7.9% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 10.7x | 41.1x | 74.5x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $475M | $102M | $560M | $375M | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $585K | $278M | $43M | $98M |
FDP vs JBSS vs FRPT vs SENEA vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh Del Monte Pro… (FDP) | 100 | 150.9 | +50.9% |
| John B. Sanfilippo … (JBSS) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 72.4 | -27.6% |
| Seneca Foods Corpor… (SENEA) | 100 | 384.1 | +284.1% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDP vs JBSS vs FRPT vs SENEA vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 23.4%, current ratio 2.16x
- Beta 0.10, yield 3.2%, current ratio 2.16x
- Beta 0.10 vs FRPT's 0.91, lower leverage
JBSS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 11.7% ROA vs FDP's 2.2%, ROIC 15.2% vs 5.8%
FRPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 183.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 13.0% revenue growth vs FDP's 1.1%
- 17.6% margin vs FDP's 1.6%
SENEA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 315.4% 10Y total return vs FRPT's 5.2%
- +56.4% vs SMPL's -64.8%
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs JBSS's 7.58
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 41.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs FDP's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 41.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs FDP's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs FRPT's 0.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs JBSS's 2.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.4% vs SMPL's -64.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs FDP's 2.2%, ROIC 15.2% vs 5.8% |
FDP vs JBSS vs FRPT vs SENEA vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FDP vs JBSS vs FRPT vs SENEA vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRPT leads in 1 of 6 categories
SMPL leads 1 • JBSS leads 1 • SENEA leads 1 • FDP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FDP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 3.8x FRPT's $1.1B. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FDP's 1.6%. On growth, FRPT holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $216M | $127M | $165M | $171M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $70M | $70M | $200M | $90M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $177M | $33M | $223M | $168M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +19.1% | +38.9% | +12.6% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +8.9% | +8.8% | +7.9% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +6.2% | +17.6% | +5.6% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +2.9% | +19.6% | +10.5% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.9% | +4.6% | +13.1% | +1.1% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.2% | +31.9% | +4.5% | +2.1% | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 49% valuation discount to SENEA's 23.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMPL offers better value at 0.51x vs SENEA's 21.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $913M | $2.7B | $730M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $1.0B | $3.0B | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.97x | 15.53x | 21.16x | 23.74x | 12.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.11x | 10.68x | 41.11x | 74.51x | 7.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.56x | 11.02x | — | 21.17x | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.59x | 8.73x | 16.62x | 8.66x | 5.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 0.82x | 2.49x | 0.46x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 2.54x | 2.59x | 1.54x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.71x | — | 221.45x | 2.45x | 7.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JBSS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBSS delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $3 for FDP. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SENEA's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FDP scores 6/9 vs JBSS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.4% | +19.5% | +17.0% | +12.6% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +11.7% | +11.4% | +7.4% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +15.2% | +5.3% | +5.3% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +20.4% | +6.0% | +7.1% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.28x | 0.46x | 0.59x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $439M | $102M | $282M | $332M | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $585,000 | $278M | $43M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $475M | $102M | $560M | $375M | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.40x | 26.02x | 13.29x | 6.90x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SENEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SENEA five years ago would be worth $28,518 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,165 for FRPT. Over the past 12 months, SENEA leads with a +56.4% total return vs SMPL's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SENEA at 43.1% vs SMPL's -31.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.2% | +14.1% | -7.1% | +29.4% | -36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.4% | +39.3% | -31.1% | +56.4% | -64.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | -22.9% | -17.4% | +193.1% | -67.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.7% | +4.0% | -68.4% | +185.2% | -64.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | +101.1% | +517.3% | +315.4% | +3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.9% | -8.3% | -6.2% | +43.1% | -31.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FDP and JBSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FDP is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRPT's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JBSS currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs SMPL's 33.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.10x | 0.31x | 0.91x | 0.22x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.58 | $85.15 | $89.80 | $167.33 | $36.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.43 | $58.47 | $46.76 | $85.20 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +91.7% | +62.2% | +83.7% | +33.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.0 | 49.2 | 29.1 | 50.0 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 264K | 80K | 1.5M | 106K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FDP and SENEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FDP as "Hold", JBSS as "Buy", FRPT as "Buy", SMPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 31.4% for FRPT (target: $73). For income investors, FDP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs JBSS's 2.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $73.42 | — | $20.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 2 | 29 | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.7% | — | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 | — | 13 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $2.08 | — | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +4.1% |
FRPT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SMPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FDP vs JBSS vs FRPT vs SENEA vs SMPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDP or JBSS or FRPT or SENEA or SMPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. (FDP). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDP or JBSS or FRPT or SENEA or SMPL?
On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Seneca Foods Corporation at 23. 7x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Simply Good Foods Company wins at 0. 31x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 66. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDP or JBSS or FRPT or SENEA or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) delivered a total return of +185.
2%, compared to -68. 4% for Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +517. 3% versus FDP's -10. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDP or JBSS or FRPT or SENEA or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.
(FDP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus Freshpet, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning FRPT is approximately 797% more volatile than FDP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 59% for Seneca Foods Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDP or JBSS or FRPT or SENEA or SMPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 1. 1% for Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. (FDP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshpet, Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to -36. 5% for Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRPT leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDP or JBSS or FRPT or SENEA or SMPL?
Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 2. 1% for Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus 4. 3% for FDP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPT leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDP or JBSS or FRPT or SENEA or SMPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 66. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 74. 5x for Seneca Foods Corporation — 67. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 62. 1% to $20. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDP or JBSS or FRPT or SENEA or SMPL?
In this comparison, FDP (3.
2% yield), JBSS (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. FRPT, SENEA, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FDP or JBSS or FRPT or SENEA or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.
(FDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 10), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FDP: -10. 2%, FRPT: +517. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDP and JBSS and FRPT and SENEA and SMPL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JBSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SENEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. FDP, JBSS pay a dividend while FRPT, SENEA, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.