Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FDP vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CAG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
FDP vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CAG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $730M | $913M | $6.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.27B | $1.61B | $1.14B | $11.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $70M | $90M | $70M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 12.6% | 19.1% | 24.6% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | 7.9% | 8.9% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 74.5x | 10.7x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $475M | $375M | $102M | $8.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $43M | $585K | $68M |
FDP vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CAG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh Del Monte Pro… (FDP) | 100 | 150.9 | +50.9% |
| Seneca Foods Corpor… (SENEA) | 100 | 384.1 | +284.1% |
| John B. Sanfilippo … (JBSS) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDP vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CAG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 23.4%, current ratio 2.16x
- PEG 0.95 vs JBSS's 7.58
- PEG 0.95 vs 7.58
SENEA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth -31.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- 315.4% 10Y total return vs JBSS's 101.1%
- 8.2% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8%
- +56.4% vs CAG's -31.5%
JBSS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 6.2% margin vs CAG's 0.1%
- 11.7% ROA vs CAG's 0.1%, ROIC 15.2% vs 6.0%
CAG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 9.8%
- Beta 0.06, yield 9.8%, current ratio 0.71x
- Beta 0.06 vs JBSS's 0.31
- 9.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FDP's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8% | |
| Value | PEG 0.95 vs 7.58 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs CAG's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs JBSS's 0.31 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FDP's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.4% vs CAG's -31.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs CAG's 0.1%, ROIC 15.2% vs 6.0% |
FDP vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CAG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FDP vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CAG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAG leads in 1 of 6 categories
JBSS leads 1 • SENEA leads 1 • FDP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SENEA and JBSS and CAG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAG is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.2B annually — 9.8x JBSS's $1.1B. JBSS is the more profitable business, keeping 6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAG's 0.1%. On growth, JBSS holds the edge at +4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $1.6B | $1.1B | $11.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $216M | $171M | $127M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $70M | $90M | $70M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $177M | $168M | $33M | $634M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +12.6% | +19.1% | +24.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +7.9% | +8.9% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +5.6% | +6.2% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +10.5% | +2.9% | +5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.9% | +1.1% | +4.6% | -6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.2% | +2.1% | +31.9% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CAG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, CAG trades at a 75% valuation discount to SENEA's 23.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAG offers better value at 0.85x vs SENEA's 21.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $730M | $913M | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $15.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.97x | 23.74x | 15.53x | 5.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.11x | 74.51x | 10.68x | 8.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.56x | 21.17x | 11.02x | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.59x | 8.66x | 8.73x | 8.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 0.46x | 0.82x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 1.54x | 2.54x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.71x | 2.45x | — | 5.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JBSS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBSS delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $0 for CAG. FDP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAG's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FDP scores 6/9 vs JBSS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.4% | +12.6% | +19.5% | +0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +7.4% | +11.7% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +5.3% | +15.2% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +7.1% | +20.4% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.59x | 0.28x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $439M | $332M | $102M | $8.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $43M | $585,000 | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $475M | $375M | $102M | $8.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.40x | 6.90x | 26.02x | 1.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SENEA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SENEA five years ago would be worth $28,518 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,565 for CAG. Over the past 12 months, SENEA leads with a +56.4% total return vs CAG's -31.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SENEA at 43.1% vs CAG's -21.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.2% | +29.4% | +14.1% | -13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.4% | +56.4% | +39.3% | -31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +193.1% | -22.9% | -50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.7% | +185.2% | +4.0% | -44.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | +315.4% | +101.1% | -27.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.9% | +43.1% | -8.3% | -21.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JBSS and CAG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAG is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JBSS's 0.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JBSS currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs CAG's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.10x | 0.22x | 0.31x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.58 | $167.33 | $85.15 | $23.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.43 | $85.20 | $58.47 | $13.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +83.7% | +91.7% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.0 | 50.0 | 49.2 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 264K | 106K | 80K | 14.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SENEA and CAG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FDP as "Hold", JBSS as "Buy", CAG as "Hold". For income investors, CAG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.75% vs JBSS's 2.67%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $17.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — | 2 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +0.0% | +2.7% | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 13 | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $0.00 | $2.08 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +1.6% | +0.1% | +0.9% |
CAG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). JBSS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FDP vs SENEA vs JBSS vs CAG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDP or SENEA or JBSS or CAG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. (FDP). Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDP or SENEA or JBSS or CAG?
On trailing P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Seneca Foods Corporation at 23. 7x. On forward P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. wins at 0. 95x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 66. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDP or SENEA or JBSS or CAG?
Over the past 5 years, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) delivered a total return of +185.
2%, compared to -44. 3% for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SENEA returned +315. 4% versus CAG's -27. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDP or SENEA or JBSS or CAG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. 's 0. 31β — meaning JBSS is approximately 404% more volatile than CAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. (FDP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 93% for Conagra Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDP or SENEA or JBSS or CAG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus 1. 1% for Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. (FDP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Conagra Brands, Inc. grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -36. 5% for Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JBSS leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDP or SENEA or JBSS or CAG?
Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus 2. 1% for Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAG leads at 11. 8% versus 4. 3% for FDP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAG leads at 25. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDP or SENEA or JBSS or CAG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. (FDP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 95x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 66. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 74. 5x for Seneca Foods Corporation — 66. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDP or SENEA or JBSS or CAG?
In this comparison, CAG (9.
8% yield), FDP (3. 2% yield), JBSS (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SENEA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FDP or SENEA or JBSS or CAG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 9. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAG: -27. 9%, SENEA: +315. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDP and SENEA and JBSS and CAG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SENEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JBSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; CAG is a small-cap deep-value stock. FDP, JBSS, CAG pay a dividend while SENEA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.