Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FDSB vs NFBK vs DCOM vs KRNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FDSB vs NFBK vs DCOM vs KRNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $84M | $588M | $1.64B | $508M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $251M | $730M | $344M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $39M | $111M | $32M |
| Gross Margin | 58.5% | 49.1% | 56.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | 16.1% | 21.5% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.4x | 10.7x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $760M | $371M | $1.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $168M | $2.35B | $167M |
FDSB vs NFBK vs DCOM vs KRNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fifth District Savi… (FDSB) | 100 | 144.7 | +44.7% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 116.1 | +16.1% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 143.3 | +43.3% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 118.6 | +18.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDSB vs NFBK vs DCOM vs KRNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDSB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.19 vs DCOM's 1.05
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs KRNY's 5.1%
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 12.9x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FDSB's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FDSB's 0.7%
DCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 68.6% 10Y total return vs FDSB's 48.4%
- NIM 2.7% vs KRNY's 1.7%
- +46.6% vs FDSB's +22.7%
KRNY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.83, yield 5.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- 5.5% yield, vs NFBK's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs KRNY's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 12.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FDSB's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs DCOM's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs NFBK's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.6% vs FDSB's +22.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FDSB's 0.7% |
FDSB vs NFBK vs DCOM vs KRNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FDSB vs NFBK vs DCOM vs KRNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories
FDSB leads 0 • NFBK leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $730M annually — 37.9x FDSB's $19M. DCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FDSB's -5.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $251M | $730M | $344M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $61M | $161M | $43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $39M | $111M | $32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $648,000 | $42M | $182M | $40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.5% | +49.1% | +56.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +16.1% | +21.5% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +11.9% | +15.2% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | +11.9% | +25.0% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +144.5% | +68.8% | +2.3% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FDSB and DCOM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, DCOM trades at a 20% valuation discount to NFBK's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NFBK's 24.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRNY's 44.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $588M | $1.6B | $508M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46M | $1.2B | -$341M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -72.43x | 19.54x | 15.73x | 19.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.42x | 10.72x | 12.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.47x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.19x | -2.18x | 44.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.36x | 2.34x | 2.25x | 1.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 0.83x | 1.09x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.64x | 9.00x | 23.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DCOM leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DCOM delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for FDSB. DCOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs FDSB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | +5.5% | +7.7% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.7% | +0.8% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +2.0% | +5.6% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +2.5% | +6.1% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.08x | 0.25x | 1.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | $592M | -$2.0B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $168M | $2.4B | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $760M | $371M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.40x | 0.46x | 0.57x | 0.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FDSB five years ago would be worth $14,839 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +46.6% total return vs FDSB's +22.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 31.8% vs KRNY's 9.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | +26.5% | +26.4% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.7% | +31.5% | +46.6% | +37.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +65.7% | +129.1% | +32.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +0.2% | +22.7% | -20.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +20.6% | +68.6% | -9.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.1% | +18.3% | +31.8% | +9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FDSB and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FDSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DCOM's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFBK currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs KRNY's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 1.00x | 1.05x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.64 | $14.21 | $37.87 | $8.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.70 | $9.90 | $24.57 | $5.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +99.0% | +98.4% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 57.0 | 60.5 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 258K | 271K | 298K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NFBK and KRNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFBK as "Hold", DCOM as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs 3.1% for NFBK (target: $15). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.45% vs DCOM's 2.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.50 | $39.50 | $9.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 10 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.7% | +2.7% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 10 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.52 | $1.00 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
DCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
FDSB vs NFBK vs DCOM vs KRNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDSB or NFBK or DCOM or KRNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDSB or NFBK or DCOM or KRNY?
On trailing P/E, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDSB or NFBK or DCOM or KRNY?
Over the past 5 years, Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB) delivered a total return of +48.
4%, compared to -20. 5% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DCOM returned +68. 6% versus KRNY's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDSB or NFBK or DCOM or KRNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning DCOM is approximately 443% more volatile than FDSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDSB or NFBK or DCOM or KRNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus 5. 1% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -250. 0% for Fifth District Savings Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDSB or NFBK or DCOM or KRNY?
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -5. 6% for Fifth District Savings Bank — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DCOM leads at 21. 5% versus -7. 4% for FDSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FDSB leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDSB or NFBK or DCOM or KRNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for Kearny Financial Corp. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 17. 6% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDSB or NFBK or DCOM or KRNY?
In this comparison, KRNY (5.
5% yield), NFBK (3. 7% yield), DCOM (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. FDSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FDSB or NFBK or DCOM or KRNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FDSB: +48. 4%, DCOM: +68. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDSB and NFBK and DCOM and KRNY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDSB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NFBK, DCOM, KRNY pay a dividend while FDSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.