Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FDSB vs TRST vs NBTB vs DCOM vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
FDSB vs TRST vs NBTB vs DCOM vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $84M | $858M | $2.35B | $1.64B | $88.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $278M | $867M | $730M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $61M | $169M | $111M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 58.5% | 67.1% | 72.1% | 56.1% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | 29.2% | 25.3% | 21.5% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.1x | 10.8x | 10.7x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $193M | $327M | $371M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $51M | $185M | $2.35B | $837M |
FDSB vs TRST vs NBTB vs DCOM vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fifth District Savi… (FDSB) | 100 | 144.2 | +44.2% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 140.8 | +40.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 93.1 | -6.9% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 96.5 | -3.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDSB vs TRST vs NBTB vs DCOM vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDSB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.19 vs DCOM's 1.05
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +60.3% vs ICE's -10.4%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- PEG 1.53 vs TRST's 4.72
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
DCOM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs TRST's 5.8%
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 19.3x), PEG 1.68 vs 2.18
ICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 225.3% 10Y total return vs TRST's 97.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FDSB's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FDSB's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs TRST's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 19.3x), PEG 1.68 vs 2.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FDSB's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs DCOM's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs ICE's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FDSB's 0.7% |
FDSB vs TRST vs NBTB vs DCOM vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FDSB vs TRST vs NBTB vs DCOM vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories
DCOM leads 2 • FDSB leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 655.2x FDSB's $19M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FDSB's -5.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $278M | $867M | $730M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $90M | $241M | $161M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $61M | $169M | $111M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $648,000 | $46M | $225M | $182M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.5% | +67.1% | +72.1% | +56.1% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +29.2% | +25.3% | +21.5% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +22.0% | +19.5% | +15.2% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | +16.4% | +25.2% | +25.0% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +144.5% | +44.1% | +39.5% | +2.3% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 50% valuation discount to ICE's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs TRST's 4.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $858M | $2.4B | $1.6B | $88.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46M | $1000M | $2.5B | -$341M | $107.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -72.43x | 14.90x | 13.53x | 15.73x | 27.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.09x | 10.80x | 10.70x | 19.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.11x | 1.92x | 2.47x | 3.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.14x | 10.35x | -2.18x | 16.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.36x | 3.08x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 7.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 1.29x | 1.21x | 1.09x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.75x | 10.75x | 9.00x | 20.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $3 for FDSB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs FDSB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | +8.9% | +9.5% | +7.7% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +7.2% | +7.9% | +5.6% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +2.8% | +2.4% | +6.1% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.28x | 0.17x | 0.25x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | $142M | $142M | -$2.0B | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $51M | $185M | $2.4B | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $193M | $327M | $371M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.40x | 0.90x | 1.05x | 0.57x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FDSB five years ago would be worth $14,839 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,266 for DCOM. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 31.8% vs FDSB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | +18.2% | +9.3% | +26.4% | -2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.7% | +60.3% | +9.0% | +46.6% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +88.2% | +54.1% | +129.1% | +50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +46.5% | +29.9% | +22.7% | +43.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +97.2% | +102.2% | +68.6% | +225.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.1% | +23.5% | +15.5% | +31.8% | +14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FDSB and TRST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FDSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DCOM's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 0.75x | 0.88x | 1.04x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.64 | $49.11 | $46.92 | $37.87 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.70 | $30.17 | $39.20 | $24.57 | $143.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +98.6% | +96.1% | +98.4% | +82.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 64.5 | 57.3 | 60.5 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 112K | 236K | 271K | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRST as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", DCOM as "Hold", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for ICE (target: $196) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs ICE's 1.24%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $46.00 | $39.50 | $195.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 10 | 10 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% | +3.2% | +2.7% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 12 | 3 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.51 | $1.43 | $1.00 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.4% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DCOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
FDSB vs TRST vs NBTB vs DCOM vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDSB or TRST or NBTB or DCOM or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDSB or TRST or NBTB or DCOM or ICE?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDSB or TRST or NBTB or DCOM or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB) delivered a total return of +48.
4%, compared to +22. 7% for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +224. 7% versus FDSB's +47. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDSB or TRST or NBTB or DCOM or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
17β versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning DCOM is approximately 510% more volatile than FDSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDSB or TRST or NBTB or DCOM or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 5. 8% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -250. 0% for Fifth District Savings Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDSB or TRST or NBTB or DCOM or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus -5. 6% for Fifth District Savings Bank — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus -7. 4% for FDSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDSB or TRST or NBTB or DCOM or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 25. 3% to $195. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDSB or TRST or NBTB or DCOM or ICE?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
2% yield), TRST (3. 1% yield), DCOM (2. 7% yield), ICE (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FDSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FDSB or TRST or NBTB or DCOM or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 1. 2% yield, +224. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +224. 7%, DCOM: +68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDSB and TRST and NBTB and DCOM and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDSB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TRST, NBTB, DCOM, ICE pay a dividend while FDSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.