Chemicals
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Chemicals - Specialty
Oil & Gas Midstream
FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Chemicals - Specialty | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $211M | $3.00B | $3.08B | $1.60B | $2.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $4.05B | $7.54B | $651M | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-49M | $-37M | $454M | $50M | $170M |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 8.2% | 19.5% | 12.7% | 19.2% |
| Operating Margin | -55.3% | 4.8% | 8.2% | 8.6% | 16.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 452.4x | 5.6x | 62.8x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.37B | $1.39B | $21M | $35M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $38M | $164M | $196M | $11M |
FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FutureFuel Corp. (FF) | 100 | 36.7 | -63.3% |
| Calumet, Inc. (CLMT) | 100 | 1346.7 | +1246.7% |
| Par Pacific Holding… (PARR) | 100 | 670.1 | +570.1% |
| REX American Resour… (REX) | 100 | 498.3 | +398.3% |
| Delek Logistics Par… (DKL) | 100 | 214.3 | +114.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FF plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CLMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.3% 10Y total return vs REX's 464.7%
PARR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 13.8x)
- +276.6% vs FF's +26.3%
- 11.2% ROA vs FF's -23.5%, ROIC 15.1% vs -39.8%
REX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 8.64x
DKL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 8.7%
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth 10.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- Beta 0.35, yield 8.7%, current ratio 1.12x
- 7.7% revenue growth vs FF's -60.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.7% revenue growth vs FF's -60.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs FF's -51.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs FF's 0.49 | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FF's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +276.6% vs FF's +26.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.2% ROA vs FF's -23.5%, ROIC 15.1% vs -39.8% |
FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DKL leads in 2 of 6 categories
PARR leads 2 • CLMT leads 1 • FF leads 0 • REX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PARR is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 78.8x FF's $96M. DKL is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FF's -51.6%. On growth, DKL holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $4.0B | $7.5B | $651M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$43M | $256M | $760M | $67M | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | -$37M | $454M | $50M | $170M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | -$76M | $282M | $18M | $112M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +8.2% | +19.5% | +12.7% | +19.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -55.3% | +4.8% | +8.2% | +8.6% | +16.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -51.6% | -0.9% | +6.0% | +7.7% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -48.0% | -1.9% | +3.7% | +2.7% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.7% | -2.0% | +4.5% | +0.4% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.2% | +4.1% | +2.9% | +2.9% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PARR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, PARR trades at a 71% valuation discount to REX's 29.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PARR's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLMT's 34.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $211M | $3.0B | $3.1B | $1.6B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $159M | $5.3B | $4.3B | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.25x | -12.96x | 8.69x | 29.50x | 15.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 452.42x | 5.62x | 62.81x | 13.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.55x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.98x | 6.30x | 16.60x | 8.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 0.72x | 0.41x | 2.50x | 2.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | — | 2.04x | 2.67x | 446.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.39x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PARR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-29 for FF. REX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKL's 5.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PARR scores 7/9 vs CLMT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | — | +32.2% | +7.7% | +19.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.5% | -1.4% | +11.2% | +6.7% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.8% | +0.3% | +15.1% | +11.4% | +14.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -51.6% | +0.5% | +18.9% | +10.1% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.90x | 0.03x | 5.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$51M | $2.3B | $1.2B | -$175M | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $38M | $164M | $196M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.4B | $1.4B | $21M | $35M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -130.01x | 0.65x | 14.33x | — | 1.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLMT five years ago would be worth $59,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,308 for FF. Over the past 12 months, PARR leads with a +276.6% total return vs FF's +26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REX at 50.8% vs FF's 1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.8% | +77.0% | +73.8% | +50.2% | +13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.3% | +204.9% | +276.6% | +147.6% | +45.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.6% | +98.7% | +197.6% | +243.1% | +45.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.9% | +496.7% | +325.5% | +250.0% | +86.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.5% | +830.4% | +255.3% | +464.7% | +207.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | +25.7% | +43.8% | +50.8% | +13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FF and PARR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PARR is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FF's 0.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FF currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs PARR's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.40x | -0.01x | 0.36x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.12 | $36.94 | $70.39 | $53.36 | $55.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.09 | $11.02 | $14.18 | $19.44 | $37.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +93.7% | +88.4% | +91.2% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.3 | 59.2 | 49.5 | 59.1 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 520K | 1.2M | 1.5M | 204K | 64K |
Analyst Outlook
DKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FF as "Buy", CLMT as "Hold", PARR as "Buy", REX as "Buy", DKL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for REX (target: $60) vs -10.4% for CLMT (target: $31). DKL is the only dividend payer here at 8.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.00 | $61.60 | $60.00 | $56.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 23 | 17 | 3 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — | — | — | +8.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — | — | — | $4.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +0.9% | +0.4% |
DKL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). PARR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the stronger pick with 7.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 7% for FutureFuel Corp. (FF). Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FutureFuel Corp. (FF) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?
On trailing P/E, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
(PARR) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus REX American Resources Corporation at 29. 5x. On forward P/E, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?
Over the past 5 years, Calumet, Inc.
(CLMT) delivered a total return of +496. 7%, compared to -16. 9% for FutureFuel Corp. (FF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLMT returned +830. 4% versus FF's +55. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
(PARR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus FutureFuel Corp. 's 0. 49β — meaning FF is approximately -5612% more volatile than PARR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 6% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is pulling ahead at 7.
7% versus -60. 7% for FutureFuel Corp. (FF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 1314% year-over-year, compared to -552. 5% for Calumet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLMT leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?
Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
4% net margin versus -51. 6% for FutureFuel Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DKL leads at 18. 0% versus -55. 3% for FF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DKL leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
(PARR) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 452. 4x for Calumet, Inc. — 446. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REX: 23. 3% to $60. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?
In this comparison, DKL (8.
7% yield) pays a dividend. FF, CLMT, PARR, REX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), 8. 7% yield, +207. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DKL: +207. 3%, FF: +55. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FF and CLMT and PARR and REX and DKL?
These companies operate in different sectors (FF (Basic Materials) and CLMT (Energy) and PARR (Energy) and REX (Basic Materials) and DKL (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PARR is a small-cap deep-value stock; REX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock. DKL pays a dividend while FF, CLMT, PARR, REX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.