Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FF
FutureFuel Corp.

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$211M
5Y Perf.-63.3%
CLMT
Calumet, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.00B
5Y Perf.+1246.7%
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.08B
5Y Perf.+570.1%
REX
REX American Resources Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.60B
5Y Perf.+398.3%
DKL
Delek Logistics Partners, LP

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.71B
5Y Perf.+114.3%

FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FF logoFF
CLMT logoCLMT
PARR logoPARR
REX logoREX
DKL logoDKL
IndustryChemicalsOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Refining & MarketingChemicals - SpecialtyOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$211M$3.00B$3.08B$1.60B$2.71B
Revenue (TTM)$96M$4.05B$7.54B$651M$1.06B
Net Income (TTM)$-49M$-37M$454M$50M$170M
Gross Margin0.1%8.2%19.5%12.7%19.2%
Operating Margin-55.3%4.8%8.2%8.6%16.5%
Forward P/E452.4x5.6x62.8x13.8x
Total Debt$0.00$2.37B$1.39B$21M$35M
Cash & Equiv.$51M$38M$164M$196M$11M

FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FF
CLMT
PARR
REX
DKL
StockMay 20May 26Return
FutureFuel Corp. (FF)10036.7-63.3%
Calumet, Inc. (CLMT)1001346.7+1246.7%
Par Pacific Holding… (PARR)100670.1+570.1%
REX American Resour… (REX)100498.3+398.3%
Delek Logistics Par… (DKL)100214.3+114.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DKL leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FF
FutureFuel Corp.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

FF plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: basic materials exposure
CLMT
Calumet, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CLMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 8.3% 10Y total return vs REX's 464.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

PARR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (5.6x vs 13.8x)
  • +276.6% vs FF's +26.3%
  • 11.2% ROA vs FF's -23.5%, ROIC 15.1% vs -39.8%
Best for: value and momentum
REX
REX American Resources Corporation
The Defensive Pick

REX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 8.64x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
DKL
Delek Logistics Partners, LP
The Income Pick

DKL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 8.7%
  • Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth 10.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
  • Beta 0.35, yield 8.7%, current ratio 1.12x
  • 7.7% revenue growth vs FF's -60.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDKL logoDKL7.7% revenue growth vs FF's -60.7%
ValuePARR logoPARRLower P/E (5.6x vs 13.8x)
Quality / MarginsDKL logoDKL16.0% margin vs FF's -51.6%
Stability / SafetyDKL logoDKLBeta 0.35 vs FF's 0.49
DividendsDKL logoDKL8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FF's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PARR logoPARR+276.6% vs FF's +26.3%
Efficiency (ROA)PARR logoPARR11.2% ROA vs FF's -23.5%, ROIC 15.1% vs -39.8%

FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FFFutureFuel Corp.
FY 2025
Chemicals
62.2%$60M
Biofuels
37.8%$36M
CLMTCalumet, Inc.
FY 2024
Specialty Products and Solutions
66.8%$2.8B
Montana/Renewables
25.3%$1.1B
Performance Brands
8.0%$336M
PARRPar Pacific Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Fuel Revenue
95.8%$7.2B
Other Revenue
4.2%$311M
REXREX American Resources Corporation
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$329,000
DKLDelek Logistics Partners, LP
FY 2023
Wholesale Marketing and Terminalling
49.6%$506M
Gathering And Processing
36.4%$371M
Storage And Transportation
14.1%$144M

FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPARRLAGGINGREX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

PARR is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 78.8x FF's $96M. DKL is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FF's -51.6%. On growth, DKL holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFF logoFFFutureFuel Corp.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…REX logoREXREX American Reso…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$96M$4.0B$7.5B$651M$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$43M$256M$760M$67M$310M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$49M-$37M$454M$50M$170M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$46M-$76M$282M$18M$112M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+0.1%+8.2%+19.5%+12.7%+19.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-55.3%+4.8%+8.2%+8.6%+16.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-51.6%-0.9%+6.0%+7.7%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-48.0%-1.9%+3.7%+2.7%+10.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-67.7%-2.0%+4.5%+0.4%+19.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.2%+4.1%+2.9%+2.9%-17.8%
DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PARR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.7x trailing earnings, PARR trades at a 71% valuation discount to REX's 29.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PARR's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLMT's 34.0x.

MetricFF logoFFFutureFuel Corp.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…REX logoREXREX American Reso…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
Market CapShares × price$211M$3.0B$3.1B$1.6B$2.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$159M$5.3B$4.3B$1.4B$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.25x-12.96x8.69x29.50x15.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.452.42x5.62x62.81x13.82x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.55x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple33.98x6.30x16.60x8.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.20x0.72x0.41x2.50x2.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.36x2.04x2.67x446.88x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.39x
PARR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PARR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-29 for FF. REX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKL's 5.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PARR scores 7/9 vs CLMT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFF logoFFFutureFuel Corp.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…REX logoREXREX American Reso…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-28.6%+32.2%+7.7%+19.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-23.5%-1.4%+11.2%+6.7%+6.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.8%+0.3%+15.1%+11.4%+14.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-51.6%+0.5%+18.9%+10.1%+8.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–932754
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.90x0.03x5.75x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$51M$2.3B$1.2B-$175M$24M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$51M$38M$164M$196M$11M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$2.4B$1.4B$21M$35M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-130.01x0.65x14.33x1.66x
PARR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CLMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLMT five years ago would be worth $59,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,308 for FF. Over the past 12 months, PARR leads with a +276.6% total return vs FF's +26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REX at 50.8% vs FF's 1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFF logoFFFutureFuel Corp.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…REX logoREXREX American Reso…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+52.8%+77.0%+73.8%+50.2%+13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+26.3%+204.9%+276.6%+147.6%+45.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.6%+98.7%+197.6%+243.1%+45.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.9%+496.7%+325.5%+250.0%+86.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.5%+830.4%+255.3%+464.7%+207.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.2%+25.7%+43.8%+50.8%+13.3%
CLMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FF and PARR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PARR is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FF's 0.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FF currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs PARR's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFF logoFFFutureFuel Corp.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…REX logoREXREX American Reso…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.49x0.40x-0.01x0.36x0.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.12$36.94$70.39$53.36$55.89
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.09$11.02$14.18$19.44$37.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.8%+93.7%+88.4%+91.2%+91.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.359.249.559.150.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded520K1.2M1.5M204K64K
Evenly matched — FF and PARR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

DKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FF as "Buy", CLMT as "Hold", PARR as "Buy", REX as "Buy", DKL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for REX (target: $60) vs -10.4% for CLMT (target: $31). DKL is the only dividend payer here at 8.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFF logoFFFutureFuel Corp.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…REX logoREXREX American Reso…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.00$61.60$60.00$56.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts42317310
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+8.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00$4.45
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.1%+0.9%+0.4%
DKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

DKL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). PARR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallPar Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FF vs CLMT vs PARR vs REX vs DKL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the stronger pick with 7.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 7% for FutureFuel Corp. (FF). Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FutureFuel Corp. (FF) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?

On trailing P/E, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus REX American Resources Corporation at 29. 5x. On forward P/E, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?

Over the past 5 years, Calumet, Inc.

(CLMT) delivered a total return of +496. 7%, compared to -16. 9% for FutureFuel Corp. (FF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLMT returned +830. 4% versus FF's +55. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus FutureFuel Corp. 's 0. 49β — meaning FF is approximately -5612% more volatile than PARR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 6% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is pulling ahead at 7.

7% versus -60. 7% for FutureFuel Corp. (FF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 1314% year-over-year, compared to -552. 5% for Calumet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLMT leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?

Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

4% net margin versus -51. 6% for FutureFuel Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DKL leads at 18. 0% versus -55. 3% for FF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DKL leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 452. 4x for Calumet, Inc. — 446. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REX: 23. 3% to $60. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL?

In this comparison, DKL (8.

7% yield) pays a dividend. FF, CLMT, PARR, REX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FF or CLMT or PARR or REX or DKL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

35), 8. 7% yield, +207. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DKL: +207. 3%, FF: +55. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FF and CLMT and PARR and REX and DKL?

These companies operate in different sectors (FF (Basic Materials) and CLMT (Energy) and PARR (Energy) and REX (Basic Materials) and DKL (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PARR is a small-cap deep-value stock; REX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock. DKL pays a dividend while FF, CLMT, PARR, REX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FF

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLMT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PARR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

REX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DKL

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FF and CLMT and PARR and REX and DKL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FF: -67.7% · CLMT: -2.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.