Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TSLA | -2.9% revenue growth vs FFAI's -31.3% |
| Quality / Margins | TSLA | 4.0% net margin vs FFAI's -745.2% |
| Stability / Safety | FFAI | Beta 1.83 vs TSLA's 2.16 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TSLA | +37.4% vs FFAI's -64.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TSLA | 2.8% ROA vs FFAI's -151.6%, ROIC 4.5% vs -39.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is a luxury electric vehicle manufacturer that designs and produces high-performance EVs. It generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales — though production has been extremely limited — with additional income from related services and technology licensing. The company's key advantage lies in its proprietary technology platform and luxury brand positioning in the ultra-premium EV segment.
Tesla is an electric vehicle and clean energy company that designs, manufactures, and sells battery-electric vehicles, solar energy systems, and energy storage solutions. It generates most of its revenue from automotive sales—roughly 85%—with the remainder coming from energy generation/storage products and regulatory credit sales. Tesla's key competitive advantage lies in its vertically integrated manufacturing, proprietary battery technology, and industry-leading Supercharger network that creates a comprehensive ecosystem.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FFAI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TSLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $94.8B annually — 147705.6x FFAI's $642,000. TSLA is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FFAI's -745.2%. On growth, FFAI holds the edge at +3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FFAIFaraday Future In… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $642,000 | $94.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$253M | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$478M | $3.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$111M | $6.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -160.2% | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -512.6% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -745.2% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -172.9% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | -3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.5% | -63.5% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FFAIFaraday Future In… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $101M | $1.51T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $193M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | 372.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 202.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 142.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 186.52x | 15.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 17.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 242.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA delivers a 4.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FFAI. TSLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FFAI's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLA scores 6/9 vs FFAI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FFAIFaraday Future In… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -151.6% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.5% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.86x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $92M | -$8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $16.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $99M | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.15x | 16.62x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $16,808 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for FFAI. Over the past 12 months, TSLA leads with a +37.4% total return vs FFAI's -64.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 25.1% vs FFAI's -95.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FFAIFaraday Future In… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.3% | -8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.0% | +37.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +95.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +68.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +3044.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -95.4% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
FFAI is the less volatile stock with a 1.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSLA's 2.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSLA currently trades 80.7% from its 52-week high vs FFAI's 13.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FFAIFaraday Future In… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 2.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.61 | $498.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.44 | $214.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.6% | +80.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.3 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.4M | 52.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FFAI as "Hold" and TSLA as "Hold".
| Metric | FFAIFaraday Future In… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $458.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 80 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Sep 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Faraday Future Inte… (FFAI) | 100 | 0 | -100.0% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 100 | 282.35 | +182.4% |
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) returned +68% over 5 years vs Faraday Future Inte… (FFAI)'s -100%. A $10,000 investment in TSLA 5 years ago would be worth $16,808 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Faraday Future Inte… (FFAI) | $0.00 | $539000.00 | — |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | $7.0B | $94.8B | +1254.6% |
Tesla, Inc.'s revenue grew from $7.0B (2016) to $94.8B (2025) — a 33.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Faraday Future Inte… (FFAI) | -550.7% | -660.2% | -19.9% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | -9.6% | 4.0% | +141.5% |
Tesla, Inc.'s net margin went from -10% (2016) to 4% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 216.1 | 416.4 | +92.7% |
Tesla, Inc. has traded in a 34x–416x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~373x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Faraday Future Inte… (FFAI) | -8,752.57 | -19.61 | +99.8% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | -0.31 | 1.08 | +448.4% |
Tesla, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.31 (2016) to $1.08 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. generated $-78M FCF in 2024 (+82% vs 2021). Tesla, Inc. generated $6B FCF in 2025 (+79% vs 2021).
FFAI vs TSLA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FFAI or TSLA a better buy right now?
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) offers the better valuation at 372.7x trailing P/E (202.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FFAI or TSLA?
Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) delivered a total return of +68.1%, compared to -100.0% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI). A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +30.4% versus FFAI's -100.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FFAI or TSLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI) is the lower-risk stock at 1.83β versus Tesla, Inc.'s 2.16β — meaning TSLA is approximately 18% more volatile than FFAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 86% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — FFAI or TSLA?
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) is the more profitable company, earning 4.0% net margin versus -660.2% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. — meaning it keeps 4.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSLA leads at 4.6% versus -277.8% for FFAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSLA leads at 18.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — FFAI or TSLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is FFAI or TSLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a higher beta of 2.16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FFAI: -100.0%, TSLA: +30.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between FFAI and TSLA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.