FFAIW
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-68.0%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FFAIW vs NIO vs LI vs XPEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NIO
NIO Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$12.28B
5Y Perf.+54.1%
LI
Li Auto Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$35.34B
5Y Perf.-30.2%
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$5.42B
5Y Perf.-25.0%
FFAIW vs NIO vs LI vs XPEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FFAIW | NIO | LI | XPEV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $3M | $12.28B | $35.34B | $5.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $536K | $69.42B | $125.72B | $60.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-391M | $-24.31B | $4.51B | $-4.28B |
| Gross Margin | -182.4% | 10.3% | 19.4% | 15.7% |
| Operating Margin | -340.3% | -32.6% | 2.3% | -8.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 11.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $118M | $33.82B | $16.34B | $15.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $19.33B | $65.90B | $18.59B |
FFAIW vs NIO vs LI vs XPEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FFAIW
NIO
LI
XPEV
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Faraday Future Inte… (FFAIW) | 100 | 32.0 | -68.0% |
| NIO Inc. (NIO) | 100 | 154.1 | +54.1% |
| Li Auto Inc. (LI) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
| XPeng Inc. (XPEV) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FFAIW vs NIO vs LI vs XPEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LI leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. NIO Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. XPEV also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FFAIW
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc.
The Secondary Option
FFAIW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
NIO
NIO Inc.
The Momentum Pick
NIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +52.9% vs FFAIW's -63.9%
Best for: momentum
LI
Li Auto Inc.
The Income Pick
LI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.94
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs XPEV's -26.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 1.82x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 1.82x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
The Growth Play
XPEV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 33.2%, EPS growth 48.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.9%
- 33.2% revenue growth vs FFAIW's -0.6%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | XPEV | 33.2% revenue growth vs FFAIW's -0.6% |
| Quality / Margins | LI | 3.6% margin vs FFAIW's -728.9% |
| Stability / Safety | LI | Beta 0.94 vs FFAIW's 2.84, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NIO | +52.9% vs FFAIW's -63.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LI | 2.8% ROA vs FFAIW's -111.3%, ROIC 209.3% vs -92.0% |
FFAIW vs NIO vs LI vs XPEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FY 2024
FY 2024
FFAIW vs NIO vs LI vs XPEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLILAGGINGNIO
Who Leads Where
LI leads in 2 of 6 categories
XPEV leads 1 • FFAIW leads 0 • NIO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓NIONIO Inc.
0leads
FFAIWFaraday Future Intell…
0leads
XPEVXPeng Inc.
1leads
LILi Auto Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XPEVvs FFAIWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LI4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
XPEV2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LI8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LI is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.7B annually — 234555.9x FFAIW's $536,000. LI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FFAIW's -728.9%. On growth, XPEV holds the edge at +125.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FFAIWFaraday Future In… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $536,000 | $69.4B | $125.7B | $60.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$115M | -$23.0B | $5.4B | -$3.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$391M | -$24.3B | $4.5B | -$4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$115M | -$16.5B | -$7.7B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -182.4% | +10.3% | +19.4% | +15.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -340.3% | -32.6% | +2.3% | -8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -728.9% | -35.0% | +3.6% | -7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -215.0% | -23.8% | -6.1% | -10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.1% | +9.0% | -36.5% | +125.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.0% | +7.6% | -123.3% | +63.2% |
LI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
XPEV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FFAIWFaraday Future In… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $12.3B | $35.3B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $86M | $14.4B | $28.1B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -3.62x | 15.89x | -17.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.29x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 20.27x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.35x | 1.27x | 1.66x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 6.08x | 1.79x | 3.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 29.32x | — |
XPEV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LI delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-9 for FFAIW. LI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FFAIW's 15.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LI scores 5/9 vs NIO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FFAIWFaraday Future In… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.3% | -2.7% | +6.2% | -13.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -111.3% | -23.7% | +2.8% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -92.0% | -55.2% | +2.1% | -16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -100.7% | -41.7% | +7.8% | -14.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 15.17x | 2.50x | 0.23x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $83M | $14.5B | -$49.6B | -$2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $19.3B | $65.9B | $18.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $118M | $33.8B | $16.3B | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -44.90x | -25.29x | 28.54x | -10.29x |
LI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NIO and LI and XPEV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LI five years ago would be worth $9,639 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,589 for NIO. Over the past 12 months, NIO leads with a +52.9% total return vs FFAIW's -63.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPEV at 13.8% vs FFAIW's -33.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FFAIWFaraday Future In… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.9% | +14.2% | +2.0% | -23.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.9% | +52.9% | -33.1% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.6% | -29.0% | -28.9% | +47.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.6% | -84.1% | -3.6% | -41.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.6% | -11.1% | +6.9% | -26.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.5% | -10.8% | -10.7% | +13.8% |
Evenly matched — NIO and LI and XPEV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NIO and LI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFAIW's 2.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NIO currently trades 73.2% from its 52-week high vs FFAIW's 16.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FFAIWFaraday Future In… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.84x | 1.29x | 0.94x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.09 | $8.02 | $32.03 | $28.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $3.34 | $15.71 | $15.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.1% | +73.2% | +54.9% | +55.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 44.3 | 44.6 | 40.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 185K | 39.7M | 3.0M | 6.4M |
Evenly matched — NIO and LI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NIO as "Buy", LI as "Buy", XPEV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.0% upside for XPEV (target: $26) vs 9.9% for NIO (target: $6).
| Metric | FFAIWFaraday Future In… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.45 | $20.01 | $25.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 16 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
LI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XPEV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallLi Auto Inc. (LI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FFAIW vs NIO vs LI vs XPEV: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FFAIW or NIO or LI or XPEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, XPeng Inc.
(XPEV) is the stronger pick with 33. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAIW). Li Auto Inc. (LI) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NIO Inc. (NIO) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FFAIW or NIO or LI or XPEV?
Over the past 5 years, Li Auto Inc.
(LI) delivered a total return of -3. 6%, compared to -84. 1% for NIO Inc. (NIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LI returned +6. 9% versus FFAIW's -70. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FFAIW or NIO or LI or XPEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Li Auto Inc.
(LI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. 's 2. 84β — meaning FFAIW is approximately 200% more volatile than LI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Li Auto Inc. (LI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 15% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FFAIW or NIO or LI or XPEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), XPeng Inc.
(XPEV) is pulling ahead at 33. 2% versus -0. 6% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAIW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. grew EPS 84. 0% year-over-year, compared to -31. 8% for Li Auto Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LI leads at 75. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FFAIW or NIO or LI or XPEV?
Li Auto Inc.
(LI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -728. 9% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LI leads at 4. 4% versus -340. 3% for FFAIW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LI leads at 20. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FFAIW or NIO or LI or XPEV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XPEV: 64.
0% to $25. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — FFAIW or NIO or LI or XPEV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FFAIW or NIO or LI or XPEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Li Auto Inc.
(LI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94)). Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAIW) carries a higher beta of 2. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LI: +6. 9%, FFAIW: -70. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FFAIW and NIO and LI and XPEV?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FFAIW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NIO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; XPEV is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FFAIW: -45.1% · NIO: 9.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.