Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FGO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs COHN vs MAN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap
5Y Perf.
KFRC
Kforce Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$744M
5Y Perf.+34.8%
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$354M
5Y Perf.-34.4%
COHN
Cohen & Company Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$80M
5Y Perf.+276.8%
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.30B
5Y Perf.-59.4%

FGO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs COHN vs MAN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FGO logoFGO
KFRC logoKFRC
KELYA logoKELYA
COHN logoCOHN
MAN logoMAN
IndustryConsulting ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesFinancial - Capital MarketsStaffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$744M$354M$80M$1.30B
Revenue (TTM)$21M$1.33B$3.09B$278M$17.96B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$35M$-266M$14M$-13M
Gross Margin78.5%27.2%26.3%93.8%16.7%
Operating Margin37.6%3.8%-2.8%22.3%0.8%
Forward P/E16.9x11.1x3.0x7.6x
Total Debt$8M$70M$159M$450M$2.39B
Cash & Equiv.$16M$2M$33M$57M$871M

FGO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs COHN vs MANLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FGO
KFRC
KELYA
COHN
MAN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Kforce Inc. (KFRC)100134.8+34.8%
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA)10065.6-34.4%
Cohen & Company Inc. (COHN)100376.8+276.8%
ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN)10040.6-59.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FGO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs COHN vs MAN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: COHN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. KFRC and MAN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
The Quality Compounder

FGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 33.2% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
  • 34.4% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 95.7% vs -4.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
KFRC
Kforce Inc.
The Income Pick

KFRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 3.8%
  • 182.9% 10Y total return vs COHN's 145.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.46, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
COHN
Cohen & Company Inc.
The Banking Pick

COHN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 249.6%, EPS growth 55.4%
  • 249.6% NII/revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
  • Lower P/E (3.0x vs 7.6x)
  • +90.4% vs MAN's -33.3%
Best for: growth exposure
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
The Income Pick

MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 5.1% yield, vs KFRC's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOHN logoCOHN249.6% NII/revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
ValueCOHN logoCOHNLower P/E (3.0x vs 7.6x)
Quality / MarginsFGO logoFGO33.2% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
Stability / SafetyKFRC logoKFRCBeta 0.46 vs KELYA's 0.96
DividendsMAN logoMAN5.1% yield, vs KFRC's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)COHN logoCOHN+90.4% vs MAN's -33.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FGO logoFGO34.4% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 95.7% vs -4.0%

FGO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs COHN vs MAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FGOFG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

KFRCKforce Inc.
FY 2025
Flex Revenue
98.1%$1.3B
Direct Hire Revenue
1.9%$26M
KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Science, Engineering & Technology
55.1%$1.2B
Education
44.9%$1.0B
COHNCohen & Company Inc.
FY 2025
New Issue and Advisory
82.5%$308M
Underwriting
16.5%$62M
Origination
1.0%$4M
MANManpowerGroup Inc.
FY 2024
StaffingandInterim
87.5%$15.7B
Outcome-BasedSolutionsandConsulting
7.0%$1.3B
PermanentRecruitment
2.7%$492M
Other
2.7%$482M
Franchise
0.1%$14M

FGO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs COHN vs MAN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFGOLAGGINGCOHN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 844.8x FGO's $21M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, MAN holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…COHN logoCOHNCohen & Company I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$21M$1.3B$3.1B$278M$18.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$56M-$54M$63M$236M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$35M-$266M$14M-$13M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$43M$66M$26M-$161M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.5%+27.2%+26.3%+93.8%+16.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+37.6%+3.8%-2.8%+22.3%+0.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+33.2%+2.6%-8.6%+5.2%-0.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.8%+3.3%+2.1%+9.4%-0.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.1%-100.0%+7.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.2%-2.1%+5.4%+36.2%
FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.0x trailing earnings, COHN trades at a 86% valuation discount to KFRC's 20.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COHN's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 14.6x.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…COHN logoCOHNCohen & Company I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
Market CapShares × price$744M$354M$80M$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$812M$480M$473M$2.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.00x20.78x-1.36x2.99x-96.69x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.92x11.12x7.63x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.60x7.53x8.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.56x0.08x0.29x0.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x5.81x0.35x0.75x0.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.90x3.10x3.06x
MAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FGO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COHN's 4.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FGO scores 6/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…COHN logoCOHNCohen & Company I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+65.5%+27.2%-24.6%+15.1%-0.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+34.4%+9.2%-11.3%+1.6%-0.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+95.7%+19.1%-4.0%+12.2%+5.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+73.8%+20.1%-4.3%+7.6%+6.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964561
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x0.56x0.16x4.37x1.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$9M$68M$126M$393M$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$16M$2M$33M$57M$871M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$70M$159M$450M$2.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-12.07x8.32x1.98x
FGO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — KFRC and COHN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KFRC five years ago would be worth $8,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,382 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, COHN leads with a +90.4% total return vs MAN's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COHN at 38.8% vs MAN's -20.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…COHN logoCOHNCohen & Company I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+31.2%+14.8%-36.2%-6.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+1.6%-17.9%+90.4%-33.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.1%-41.3%+167.1%-50.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.4%-55.3%-21.8%-66.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+182.9%-34.4%+145.9%-34.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.2%-16.3%+38.8%-20.6%
Evenly matched — KFRC and COHN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KELYA's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 85.8% from its 52-week high vs COHN's 39.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…COHN logoCOHNCohen & Company I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.46x0.96x0.51x0.89x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.00$47.48$14.94$32.60$47.34
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$24.49$7.98$7.78$25.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.8%+65.9%+39.9%+59.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.259.129.245.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded0298K366K31K1.0M
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KFRC and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", MAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 74.4% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 35.0% for MAN (target: $38). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.10% vs COHN's 2.74%.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…COHN logoCOHNCohen & Company I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$71.00$15.00$37.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts10529
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%+3.2%+2.7%+5.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises8510
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.55$0.31$0.36$1.43
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.8%+3.5%0.0%+2.9%
Evenly matched — KFRC and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallFG Holdings Limited Class A… (FGO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FGO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs COHN vs MAN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FGO or KFRC or KELYA or COHN or MAN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cohen & Company Inc.

(COHN) is the stronger pick with 249. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Cohen & Company Inc. (COHN) offers the better valuation at 3. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FGO or KFRC or KELYA or COHN or MAN?

On trailing P/E, Cohen & Company Inc.

(COHN) is the cheapest at 3. 0x versus Kforce Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FGO or KFRC or KELYA or COHN or MAN?

Over the past 5 years, Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) delivered a total return of -16. 4%, compared to -66. 2% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +182. 9% versus KELYA's -34. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FGO or KFRC or KELYA or COHN or MAN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Kelly Services, Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning KELYA is approximately 108% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 4% for Cohen & Company Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FGO or KFRC or KELYA or COHN or MAN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cohen & Company Inc.

(COHN) is pulling ahead at 249. 6% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cohen & Company Inc. grew EPS 55. 4% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAN leads at -3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FGO or KFRC or KELYA or COHN or MAN?

FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.

2% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FGO leads at 37. 6% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COHN leads at 93. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FGO or KFRC or KELYA or COHN or MAN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Kforce Inc. — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 74. 4% to $71. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FGO or KFRC or KELYA or COHN or MAN?

In this comparison, MAN (5.

1% yield), KFRC (3. 8% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield), COHN (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. FGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FGO or KFRC or KELYA or COHN or MAN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 3. 8% yield, +182. 9% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FGO and KFRC and KELYA and COHN and MAN?

These companies operate in different sectors (FGO (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials) and COHN (Financial Services) and MAN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; COHN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KFRC, KELYA, COHN, MAN pay a dividend while FGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FGO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KFRC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KELYA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COHN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 124%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MAN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FGO and KFRC and KELYA and COHN and MAN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FGO: 40.0% · KFRC: 0.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(FGO: 33.2% · KFRC: 2.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.