Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FHB vs BOH vs HBCP vs COLB vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FHB vs BOH vs HBCP vs COLB vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.37B | $3.18B | $512M | $7.04B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.17B | $1.03B | $209M | $3.21B | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $276M | $184M | $46M | $550M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 60.3% | 70.5% | 67.7% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 30.3% | 19.2% | 27.7% | 23.4% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 13.3x | 11.1x | 9.7x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $747M | $58M | $4.01B | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229M | $764M | $142M | $511M | $108M |
FHB vs BOH vs HBCP vs COLB vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB) | 100 | 159.0 | +59.0% |
| Bank of Hawaii Corp… (BOH) | 100 | 124.2 | +24.2% |
| Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) | 100 | 275.3 | +175.3% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FHB vs BOH vs HBCP vs COLB vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FHB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BOH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HBCP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 163.2% 10Y total return vs CVBF's 67.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 13.3%, current ratio 0.27x
- PEG 0.71 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Beta 0.83, yield 0.1%, current ratio 0.27x
COLB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth -9.8%
- 8.3% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 14.2x)
CVBF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 4.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs COLB's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COLB's 3.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs COLB's 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.3% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 14.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs COLB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs COLB's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COLB's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.3% vs CVBF's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs COLB's 0.4% |
FHB vs BOH vs HBCP vs COLB vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FHB vs BOH vs HBCP vs COLB vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 2 of 6 categories
HBCP leads 2 • COLB leads 1 • FHB leads 0 • BOH leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 15.4x HBCP's $209M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOH's 14.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $1.0B | $209M | $3.2B | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $380M | $294M | $60M | $895M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $276M | $184M | $46M | $550M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $303M | $235M | $44M | $724M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.1% | +60.3% | +70.5% | +67.7% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +19.2% | +27.7% | +23.4% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +14.6% | +22.0% | +17.1% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +16.4% | +21.2% | +22.0% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.6% | +29.0% | +20.7% | +5.9% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
COLB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, HBCP trades at a 52% valuation discount to BOH's 23.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HBCP offers better value at 0.72x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $3.2B | $512M | $7.0B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $3.2B | $428M | $10.5B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | 23.08x | 11.14x | 12.85x | 13.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.09x | 13.28x | 11.07x | 9.65x | 14.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.39x | — | 0.72x | — | 4.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.87x | 13.78x | 7.38x | 11.76x | 13.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.88x | 3.09x | 2.45x | 2.19x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 1.90x | 1.18x | 1.12x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.11x | 18.83x | 11.54x | 9.97x | 12.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FHB and HBCP and CVBF each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBCP delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for COLB. HBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COLB's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBCP scores 9/9 vs BOH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.2% | +10.3% | +11.0% | +8.4% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.8% | +1.3% | +0.9% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +6.4% | +7.7% | +5.4% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +7.4% | +5.7% | +2.0% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.45x | 0.13x | 0.51x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$229M | -$17M | -$84M | $3.5B | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229M | $764M | $142M | $511M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $747M | $58M | $4.0B | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.23x | 0.72x | 0.96x | 0.82x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBCP five years ago would be worth $18,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,185 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, HBCP leads with a +33.3% total return vs CVBF's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBCP at 32.7% vs COLB's 20.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.9% | +17.8% | +14.9% | +6.2% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.8% | +23.5% | +33.3% | +32.6% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.8% | +105.1% | +133.5% | +75.3% | +94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.5% | -0.6% | +83.0% | -18.1% | +12.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.6% | +56.2% | +163.2% | +51.1% | +67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.4% | +27.1% | +32.7% | +20.6% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
HBCP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBCP currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs COLB's 90.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.98x | 0.83x | 1.37x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.35 | $82.73 | $65.99 | $32.70 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.65 | $59.36 | $47.96 | $21.91 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +96.5% | +99.1% | +90.4% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.9 | 61.6 | 59.4 | 60.4 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 401K | 120K | 2.7M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CVBF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FHB as "Hold", BOH as "Hold", HBCP as "Buy", COLB as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -23.5% for HBCP (target: $50). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs BOH's 3.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.83 | $79.67 | $50.00 | $32.92 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 15 | 3 | 19 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +3.5% | +0.1% | +3.8% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.04 | $2.83 | $0.05 | $1.13 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +0.2% | +2.8% | +1.5% | +2.9% |
CVBF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). HBCP leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
FHB vs BOH vs HBCP vs COLB vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FHB or BOH or HBCP or COLB or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is the stronger pick with 8. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FHB or BOH or HBCP or COLB or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) is the cheapest at 11. 1x versus Bank of Hawaii Corporation at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 71x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FHB or BOH or HBCP or COLB or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) delivered a total return of +83. 0%, compared to -18. 1% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HBCP returned +163. 2% versus COLB's +51. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FHB or BOH or HBCP or COLB or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning COLB is approximately 65% more volatile than HBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 51% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FHB or BOH or HBCP or COLB or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is pulling ahead at 8. 3% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 28. 4% year-over-year, compared to -16. 4% for Bank of Hawaii Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FHB or BOH or HBCP or COLB or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 14. 6% for Bank of Hawaii Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 19. 2% for BOH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FHB or BOH or HBCP or COLB or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for CVB Financial Corp. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — FHB or BOH or HBCP or COLB or CVBF?
In this comparison, CVBF (4.
0% yield), COLB (3. 8% yield), FHB (3. 8% yield), BOH (3. 5% yield) pay a dividend. HBCP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FHB or BOH or HBCP or COLB or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 4. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CVBF: +67. 6%, COLB: +51. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FHB and BOH and HBCP and COLB and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FHB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. FHB, BOH, COLB, CVBF pay a dividend while HBCP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.