Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FINW vs MFIN vs BYFC vs PFSI vs ENVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Banks - Regional
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Credit Services
FINW vs MFIN vs BYFC vs PFSI vs ENVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Regional | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $192M | $225M | $92M | $4.62B | $4.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $151M | $353M | $63M | $4.36B | $3.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $47M | $-25M | $507M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 96.7% | 51.9% | 91.4% | 50.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 50.5% | -38.8% | 34.6% | 23.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.0x | 8.7x | — | 8.4x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $316M | $153M | $23.06B | $4.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $163M | $202M | $11M | $302M | $72M |
FINW vs MFIN vs BYFC vs PFSI vs ENVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FinWise Bancorp (FINW) | 100 | 104.9 | +4.9% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 122.3 | +22.3% |
| Broadway Financial … (BYFC) | 100 | 46.4 | -53.6% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 143.0 | +43.0% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 458.8 | +358.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FINW vs MFIN vs BYFC vs PFSI vs ENVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FINW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 0.22x
- NIM 7.4% vs BYFC's 2.5%
MFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.7%
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
- 4.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PFSI's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
BYFC is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.02 vs ENVA's 1.48, lower leverage
PFSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
- 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs BYFC's -3.8%
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.6x)
ENVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 20.3% 10Y total return vs PFSI's 6.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BYFC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- +87.8% vs PFSI's -8.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BYFC's 0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs BYFC's -3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BYFC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs ENVA's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PFSI's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.8% vs PFSI's -8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BYFC's 0.9% |
FINW vs MFIN vs BYFC vs PFSI vs ENVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FINW vs MFIN vs BYFC vs PFSI vs ENVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ENVA leads 2 • BYFC leads 1 • FINW leads 0 • PFSI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 69.2x BYFC's $63M. MFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BYFC's -39.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $151M | $353M | $63M | $4.4B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $23M | $111M | -$24M | $1.0B | $815M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $47M | -$25M | $507M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.5B | $126M | -$13,000 | -$3.8B | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +96.7% | +51.9% | +91.4% | +50.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +50.5% | -38.8% | +34.6% | +23.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +12.2% | -39.3% | +11.5% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -37.8% | +35.7% | -0.0% | -32.4% | +56.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.0% | +16.3% | -46.8% | +7.7% | +28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MFIN and BYFC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 64% valuation discount to ENVA's 14.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FINW's 1.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFSI's 18.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $192M | $225M | $92M | $4.6B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $340M | $234M | $27.4B | $8.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.39x | 5.37x | -3.05x | 9.53x | 14.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.01x | 8.66x | — | 8.40x | 10.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.51x | 1.90x | — | 18.11x | 11.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 0.64x | 1.45x | 1.06x | 1.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 0.46x | 0.32x | 1.11x | 3.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.78x | — | — | 2.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-9 for BYFC. FINW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFSI's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFIN scores 7/9 vs FINW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | +9.4% | -9.1% | +12.0% | +24.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.6% | -1.9% | +1.8% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +17.2% | -3.7% | +4.4% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | +10.0% | -5.6% | +10.4% | +13.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.62x | 0.58x | 5.35x | 3.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$159M | $115M | $142M | $22.8B | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $163M | $202M | $11M | $302M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $316M | $153M | $23.1B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.98x | 1.07x | -0.87x | 1.35x | 79.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $46,811 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,685 for BYFC. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +87.8% total return vs PFSI's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 59.0% vs BYFC's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.7% | -4.9% | +29.3% | -32.4% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.0% | +8.2% | +52.8% | -8.0% | +87.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.5% | +58.9% | +30.9% | +59.2% | +302.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | +23.2% | -33.2% | +63.7% | +368.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | +60.3% | -37.6% | +603.4% | +2034.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.2% | +16.7% | +9.4% | +16.8% | +59.0% |
Risk & Volatility
BYFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVA's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYFC currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs PFSI's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 1.14x | 0.01x | 0.90x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.49 | $11.00 | $9.86 | $160.36 | $176.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.30 | $7.88 | $5.60 | $82.67 | $89.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.2% | +86.9% | +99.8% | +55.3% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 22.7 | 55.0 | 75.4 | 40.4 | 65.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 59K | 4K | 604K | 227K |
Analyst Outlook
MFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FINW as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold", PFSI as "Buy", ENVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.7% upside for PFSI (target: $138) vs 15.7% for ENVA (target: $200). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.73% vs PFSI's 1.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.50 | — | — | $138.00 | $199.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 9 | — | 20 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.7% | +3.5% | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.45 | $0.35 | $1.16 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +5.0% |
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). ENVA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FINW vs MFIN vs BYFC vs PFSI vs ENVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FINW or MFIN or BYFC or PFSI or ENVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FinWise Bancorp (FINW) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FINW or MFIN or BYFC or PFSI or ENVA?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Enova International, Inc. at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FINW or MFIN or BYFC or PFSI or ENVA?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +368. 1%, compared to -33. 2% for Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 6% versus BYFC's -37. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FINW or MFIN or BYFC or PFSI or ENVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
01β versus Enova International, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ENVA is approximately 17696% more volatile than BYFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinWise Bancorp (FINW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FINW or MFIN or BYFC or PFSI or ENVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus -3. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 59. 2% year-over-year, compared to -81. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FINW or MFIN or BYFC or PFSI or ENVA?
Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus -39. 3% for Broadway Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus -38. 8% for BYFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FINW or MFIN or BYFC or PFSI or ENVA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for FinWise Bancorp — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFSI: 55. 7% to $138. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FINW or MFIN or BYFC or PFSI or ENVA?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
7% yield), BYFC (3. 5% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. FINW, ENVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FINW or MFIN or BYFC or PFSI or ENVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
01), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYFC: -37. 8%, ENVA: +20. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FINW and MFIN and BYFC and PFSI and ENVA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FINW is a small-cap high-growth stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BYFC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. MFIN, BYFC, PFSI pay a dividend while FINW, ENVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.