Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FISI vs TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FISI vs TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $697M | $869M | $2.38B | $7.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $378M | $278M | $867M | $2.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $75M | $61M | $169M | $566M |
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 67.1% | 72.1% | 80.0% |
| Operating Margin | 24.2% | 29.2% | 25.3% | 34.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 17.1x | 10.9x | 12.8x |
| Total Debt | $334M | $193M | $327M | $3.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $109M | $51M | $185M | $803M |
FISI vs TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Instituti… (FISI) | 100 | 200.2 | +100.2% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 155.7 | +55.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| Commerce Bancshares… (CBSH) | 100 | 103.9 | +3.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FISI vs TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FISI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 43.1%, EPS growth 231.3%
- PEG 0.94 vs TRST's 4.72
- 43.1% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2%
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 12.8x), PEG 0.94 vs 1.13
TRST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +60.1% vs CBSH's -16.3%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 3.1%
- 104.0% 10Y total return vs TRST's 99.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.88, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.60x
CBSH is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs TRST's 2.6%
- Beta 0.67 vs FISI's 1.00
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.1% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 12.8x), PEG 0.94 vs 1.13 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs FISI's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.1% vs CBSH's -16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
FISI vs TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FISI vs TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CBSH leads in 2 of 6 categories
FISI leads 1 • TRST leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBSH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBSH is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 7.7x TRST's $278M. CBSH is the more profitable business, keeping 26.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBTB's 19.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $378M | $278M | $867M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $97M | $90M | $241M | $796M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $75M | $61M | $169M | $566M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $46M | $225M | $570M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.7% | +67.1% | +72.1% | +80.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | +29.2% | +25.3% | +34.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +22.0% | +19.5% | +26.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +16.4% | +25.2% | +27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +118.9% | +44.1% | +39.5% | +1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FISI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, FISI trades at a 35% valuation discount to TRST's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISI offers better value at 1.04x vs TRST's 4.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $697M | $869M | $2.4B | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $923M | $1.0B | $2.5B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.81x | 15.10x | 13.69x | 12.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.87x | 17.09x | 10.94x | 12.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.04x | 4.16x | 1.95x | 1.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.10x | 11.27x | 10.46x | 12.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.84x | 3.12x | 2.74x | 3.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 1.31x | 1.22x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 51.25x | 19.00x | 10.87x | 12.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBSH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBSH delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $9 for TRST. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBSH's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRST scores 7/9 vs CBSH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.3% | +8.9% | +9.5% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +7.2% | +7.9% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +2.8% | +2.4% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.28x | 0.17x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $225M | $142M | $142M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $109M | $51M | $185M | $803M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $334M | $193M | $327M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | 0.90x | 1.05x | 1.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $14,898 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,657 for CBSH. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.1% total return vs CBSH's -16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FISI at 35.1% vs CBSH's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | +19.8% | +10.5% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.2% | +60.1% | +8.6% | -16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.3% | +90.4% | +55.7% | +18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.8% | +49.0% | +33.5% | -13.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.9% | +99.2% | +104.0% | +101.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.1% | +24.0% | +15.9% | +5.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRST and CBSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISI's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs CBSH's 78.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.75x | 0.88x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.70 | $49.21 | $46.92 | $66.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.41 | $30.17 | $39.20 | $46.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +99.7% | +97.2% | +78.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 63.0 | 56.2 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 109K | 110K | 237K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FISI and NBTB and CBSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FISI as "Hold", TRST as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CBSH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.7% upside for CBSH (target: $59) vs 0.9% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FISI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.44% vs CBSH's 2.08%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.00 | — | $46.00 | $58.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 3 | 10 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +3.1% | +3.1% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.22 | $1.51 | $1.43 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +4.4% | +0.4% | +2.7% |
CBSH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FISI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FISI vs TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FISI or TRST or NBTB or CBSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is the stronger pick with 43. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FISI or TRST or NBTB or CBSH?
On trailing P/E, Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, Financial Institutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Financial Institutions, Inc. wins at 0. 94x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FISI or TRST or NBTB or CBSH?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +49.
0%, compared to -13. 4% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +104. 0% versus FISI's +67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FISI or TRST or NBTB or CBSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Financial Institutions, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning FISI is approximately 49% more volatile than CBSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 79% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FISI or TRST or NBTB or CBSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is pulling ahead at 43. 1% versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Financial Institutions, Inc. grew EPS 231. 3% year-over-year, compared to 5. 4% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FISI or TRST or NBTB or CBSH?
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 5% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBSH leads at 34. 2% versus 24. 2% for FISI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBSH leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FISI or TRST or NBTB or CBSH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBSH: 12. 7% to $58. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FISI or TRST or NBTB or CBSH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 2. 1% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH).
09Is FISI or TRST or NBTB or CBSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 2. 1% yield, +101. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBSH: +101. 4%, FISI: +67. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FISI and TRST and NBTB and CBSH?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FISI is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CBSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.