Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Food Distribution
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Specialty Retail | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $3.27B | $1.04T | $340.74B | $35.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.20B | $703.06B | $49.28B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $187M | $22.91B | $13.70B | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 24.9% | 61.7% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 4.1% | 29.3% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | 44.7x | 24.3x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $72M | $67.09B | $45.49B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $194M | $10.73B | $10.27B | $1.07B |
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Beverage C… (FIZZ) | 100 | 122.7 | +22.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.6 | +214.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 169.6 | +69.6% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.9 | +32.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIZZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.29, yield 9.3%, current ratio 2.90x
- 9.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8%
- 27.1% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 57.9% vs 15.7%
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs KO's 112.5%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs FIZZ's 0.8%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.29 vs WMT's 4.06
- Lower P/E (16.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.29 vs 2.18
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs FIZZ's 0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.29 vs 2.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs SYY's 0.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.0% vs FIZZ's -20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.1% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 57.9% vs 15.7% |
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories
SYY leads 1 • FIZZ leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 586.1x FIZZ's $1.2B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYY's 2.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $703.1B | $49.3B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $258M | $42.8B | $15.5B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $187M | $22.9B | $13.7B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $157M | $15.3B | $12.6B | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +24.9% | +61.7% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +4.1% | +29.3% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +3.3% | +27.8% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +2.2% | +25.5% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | +5.8% | +12.1% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +35.1% | +18.2% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SYY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, FIZZ trades at a 63% valuation discount to WMT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $1.04T | $340.7B | $35.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $1.09T | $376.0B | $48.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.57x | 47.65x | 26.04x | 19.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.46x | 44.67x | 24.33x | 15.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.36x | 4.33x | 2.33x | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.30x | 24.83x | 25.38x | 11.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.72x | 1.45x | 7.11x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.38x | 10.44x | 9.96x | 19.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.21x | 24.94x | 64.34x | 19.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIZZ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $22 for WMT. FIZZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs SYY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.3% | +22.3% | +41.1% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +27.1% | +7.9% | +13.1% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +57.9% | +14.7% | +15.8% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +40.4% | +17.5% | +17.3% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.67x | 1.33x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$122M | $56.4B | $35.2B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $194M | $10.7B | $10.3B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72M | $67.1B | $45.5B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.85x | 10.70x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,707 for FIZZ. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +33.0% total return vs FIZZ's -20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs FIZZ's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.4% | +15.6% | +15.3% | +2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.2% | +33.0% | +13.3% | +7.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.1% | +160.2% | +33.1% | +4.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.9% | +185.3% | +62.3% | -2.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.0% | +505.0% | +112.5% | +84.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.6% | +37.5% | +10.0% | +1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYY's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs FIZZ's 73.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 0.12x | -0.09x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.89 | $134.69 | $82.00 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.21 | $91.89 | $65.35 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.0% | +96.6% | +96.5% | +80.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 58.1 | 58.6 | 39.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 218K | 17.2M | 13.4M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIZZ and WMT and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FIZZ as "Sell", WMT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs -2.7% for FIZZ (target: $34). For income investors, FIZZ offers the higher dividend yield at 9.29% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $137.04 | $85.71 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 64 | 48 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +0.7% | +2.6% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 37 | 35 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.25 | $0.94 | $2.04 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +3.6% |
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SYY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ). National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY?
On trailing P/E, National Beverage Corp.
(FIZZ) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to -12. 9% for National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +505. 0% versus SYY's +84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
09β versus Sysco Corporation's 0. 47β — meaning SYY is approximately -633% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 0. 8% for National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -4. 1% for Sysco Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYY leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 2% for Sysco Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 3. 8% for SYY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 28. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 23. 3% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, SYY: +84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIZZ and WMT and KO and SYY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FIZZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.