Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Food Distribution
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Specialty Retail | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Food Distribution | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $3.29B | $1.04T | $337.62B | $34.91B | $213.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.20B | $703.06B | $49.28B | $83.57B | $93.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $187M | $22.91B | $13.70B | $1.74B | $8.24B |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 24.9% | 61.7% | 18.5% | 54.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 4.1% | 29.3% | 3.6% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 44.7x | 24.1x | 15.9x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $72M | $67.09B | $45.49B | $14.49B | $49.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $194M | $10.73B | $10.27B | $1.07B | $9.16B |
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Beverage C… (FIZZ) | 100 | 123.4 | +23.4% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 168.0 | +68.0% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
| PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | 100 | 118.8 | +18.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIZZ has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.29, yield 9.2%, current ratio 2.90x
- 9.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8%
- 27.1% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 57.9% vs 15.7%
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs KO's 111.2%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs FIZZ's 0.8%
- +32.7% vs FIZZ's -19.4%
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.29 vs PEP's 5.53
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 18.0x), PEG 0.29 vs 5.53
PEP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 25 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 3.6%
- Beta 0.03 vs SYY's 0.47, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs FIZZ's 0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 18.0x), PEG 0.29 vs 5.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs SYY's 0.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs FIZZ's -19.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.1% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 57.9% vs 15.7% |
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories
SYY leads 1 • FIZZ leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • PEP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 586.1x FIZZ's $1.2B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYY's 2.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $703.1B | $49.3B | $83.6B | $93.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $258M | $42.8B | $15.5B | $4.0B | $14.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $187M | $22.9B | $13.7B | $1.7B | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $157M | $15.3B | $12.6B | $2.0B | $7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +24.9% | +61.7% | +18.5% | +54.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +4.1% | +29.3% | +3.6% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +3.3% | +27.8% | +2.1% | +8.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +2.2% | +25.5% | +2.4% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | +5.8% | +12.1% | +4.7% | +5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +35.1% | +18.2% | -13.4% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SYY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.7x trailing earnings, FIZZ trades at a 63% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs PEP's 7.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $1.04T | $337.6B | $34.9B | $213.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $1.09T | $372.8B | $48.3B | $254.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.67x | 47.69x | 25.80x | 19.54x | 26.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.56x | 44.71x | 24.11x | 15.88x | 18.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.37x | 4.33x | 2.31x | 0.36x | 7.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.37x | 24.85x | 25.17x | 11.58x | 17.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.74x | 1.46x | 7.04x | 0.43x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.42x | 10.45x | 9.87x | 19.23x | 10.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.32x | 24.97x | 63.75x | 19.60x | 27.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIZZ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $22 for WMT. FIZZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PEP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.3% | +22.3% | +41.1% | +80.7% | +40.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +27.1% | +7.9% | +13.1% | +6.4% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +57.9% | +14.7% | +15.8% | +15.7% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +40.4% | +17.5% | +17.3% | +19.0% | +16.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.67x | 1.33x | 7.81x | 2.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$122M | $56.4B | $35.2B | $13.4B | $40.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $194M | $10.7B | $10.3B | $1.1B | $9.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72M | $67.1B | $45.5B | $14.5B | $49.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.85x | 10.70x | 4.35x | 10.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,683 for FIZZ. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs FIZZ's -19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs FIZZ's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.1% | +15.7% | +14.3% | +1.9% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.4% | +32.7% | +11.2% | +6.4% | +22.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.7% | +160.5% | +31.9% | +4.0% | -10.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.2% | +186.9% | +61.1% | -3.9% | +24.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.6% | +499.5% | +111.2% | +82.2% | +89.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.4% | +37.6% | +9.7% | +1.3% | -3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYY's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs FIZZ's 73.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 0.12x | -0.09x | 0.47x | 0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.89 | $134.69 | $82.00 | $91.69 | $171.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.21 | $91.89 | $65.35 | $68.19 | $127.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +96.7% | +95.7% | +79.5% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 55.9 | 61.7 | 41.7 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 220K | 17.2M | 13.4M | 4.7M | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIZZ and WMT and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FIZZ as "Sell", WMT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", SYY as "Buy", PEP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.1% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs -3.3% for FIZZ (target: $34). For income investors, FIZZ offers the higher dividend yield at 9.23% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $137.04 | $85.71 | $90.44 | $174.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 64 | 48 | 30 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.2% | +0.7% | +2.6% | +2.8% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 37 | 35 | 37 | 25 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.25 | $0.94 | $2.04 | $2.04 | $5.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +3.6% | +0.5% |
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SYY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FIZZ vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ). National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
On trailing P/E, National Beverage Corp.
(FIZZ) is the cheapest at 17. 7x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -13. 2% for National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus SYY's +82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
09β versus Sysco Corporation's 0. 47β — meaning SYY is approximately -633% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 0. 8% for National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -13. 7% for PepsiCo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYY leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 2% for Sysco Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 3. 8% for SYY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 28. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 24. 1% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) offers the highest yield at 9. 2%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is FIZZ or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, SYY: +82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIZZ and WMT and KO and SYY and PEP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FIZZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a large-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.