FLD
Fold Holdings Inc
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Market Cap$60M
5Y Perf.-88.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FLD vs SBET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$1.47B
5Y Perf.-4.5%
FLD vs SBET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FLD | SBET |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $60M | $1.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $28M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-735M |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 93.2% |
| Operating Margin | -87.2% | -20.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $29M |
FLD vs SBET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FLD
SBET
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) | 100 | 11.2 | -88.8% |
| SharpLink Gaming Lt… (SBET) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLD vs SBET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FLD leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. SharpLink Gaming Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FLD
Fold Holdings Inc
The Banking Pick
FLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.55
- -88.8% 10Y total return vs SBET's -98.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, current ratio 0.86x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
The Growth Play
SBET is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 53.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.3%
- 6.7% revenue growth vs FLD's -61.9%
- +127.8% vs FLD's -69.9%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SBET | 6.7% revenue growth vs FLD's -61.9% |
| Quality / Margins | FLD | -218.9% margin vs SBET's -26.2% |
| Stability / Safety | FLD | Beta 1.55 vs SBET's 3.41 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SBET | +127.8% vs FLD's -69.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FLD | -41.2% ROA vs SBET's -49.3%, ROIC -68.9% vs -35.2% |
FLD vs SBET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FLD vs SBET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFLDLAGGINGSBET
SBETSharpLink Gaming Ltd.
2leads
FLDFold Holdings Inc
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SBETMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FLD3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SBET2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SBET4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FLD2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLD and SBET operate at a comparable scale, with $32M and $28M in trailing revenue. FLD is the more profitable business, keeping -2.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBET's -26.2%.
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $28M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | -$561M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$735M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +93.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.2% | -20.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -26.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -50.7% | -65.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +18.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.2% | +94.3% |
FLD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SBET leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $60M | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.75x | -1.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.87x | 52.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 0.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
SBET leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FLD and SBET each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SBET delivers a -49.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-49 in annual profit, vs $-88 for FLD. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLD scores 4/9 vs SBET's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.5% | -49.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.2% | -49.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -68.9% | -35.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.6% | -46.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$29M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.69x | — |
Evenly matched — FLD and SBET each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SBET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLD five years ago would be worth $1,121 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $112 for SBET. Over the past 12 months, SBET leads with a +127.8% total return vs FLD's -69.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBET at -42.9% vs FLD's -51.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.4% | -23.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -69.9% | +127.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -81.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -98.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -98.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.8% | -42.9% |
SBET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLD is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBET's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLD currently trades 22.2% from its 52-week high vs SBET's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 3.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.53 | $124.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $2.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.2% | +6.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 6.9M |
FLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FLD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). SBET leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallFold Holdings Inc (FLD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FLD vs SBET: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLD or SBET a better buy right now?
Analysts rate SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
(SBET) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLD or SBET?
Over the past 5 years, Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) delivered a total return of -88.
8%, compared to -98. 9% for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLD returned -88. 8% versus SBET's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLD or SBET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
55β versus SharpLink Gaming Ltd. 's 3. 41β — meaning SBET is approximately 120% more volatile than FLD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FLD or SBET?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
grew EPS 53. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1275. 0% for Fold Holdings Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLD or SBET?
Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) is the more profitable company, earning -218.
9% net margin versus -26. 2% for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. — meaning it keeps -218. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLD leads at -87. 2% versus -1999. 5% for SBET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBET leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FLD or SBET?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FLD or SBET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLD: -88. 8%, SBET: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FLD and SBET?
These companies operate in different sectors (FLD (Financial Services) and SBET (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SBET is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.