FLD
Fold Holdings Inc
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Market Cap$60M
5Y Perf.-88.8%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FLD vs SBET vs SOFI vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$1.47B
5Y Perf.-4.5%
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
Financial - Credit Services
Market Cap$20.40B
5Y Perf.+112.2%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-35.4%
FLD vs SBET vs SOFI vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FLD | SBET | SOFI | MARA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $60M | $1.47B | $20.40B | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $28M | $4.77B | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-735M | $481M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 93.2% | 75.1% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -87.2% | -20.0% | 11.0% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.1x | 26.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $1.82B | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $29M | $4.93B | $547M |
FLD vs SBET vs SOFI vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FLD
SBET
SOFI
MARA
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) | 100 | 11.2 | -88.8% |
| SharpLink Gaming Lt… (SBET) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 212.2 | +112.2% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLD vs SBET vs SOFI vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SBET leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. SoFi Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. FLD also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FLD
Fold Holdings Inc
The Banking Pick
FLD is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.55, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 1.55 vs SBET's 3.41
Best for: defensive
SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
The Income Pick
SBET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 3.41
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 53.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.3%
- 6.7% revenue growth vs FLD's -61.9%
- Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
The Banking Pick
SOFI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 52.7% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.54, Low D/E 17.3%
- NIM 4.4% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 10.1% margin vs SBET's -26.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play
MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SBET | 6.7% revenue growth vs FLD's -61.9% |
| Value | SBET | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | SOFI | 10.1% margin vs SBET's -26.2% |
| Stability / Safety | FLD | Beta 1.55 vs SBET's 3.41 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SBET | +127.8% vs FLD's -69.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SOFI | 1.1% ROA vs SBET's -49.3%, ROIC 3.6% vs -35.2% |
FLD vs SBET vs SOFI vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FLD vs SBET vs SOFI vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSOFILAGGINGMARA
Who Leads Where
SOFI leads in 2 of 6 categories
SBET leads 1 • FLD leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓MARAMarathon Digital Hold…
0leads
FLDFold Holdings Inc
0leads
SBETSharpLink Gaming Ltd.
1leads
SOFISoFi Technologies, In…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SBETvs FLDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SBET2/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SOFI6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SOFI4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SBET and SOFI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 170.0x SBET's $28M. SOFI is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBET's -26.2%.
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | SOFISoFi Technologies… | MARAMarathon Digital … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $28M | $4.8B | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | -$561M | $760M | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$735M | $481M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$18M | -$2.6B | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +93.2% | +75.1% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.2% | -20.0% | +11.0% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -26.2% | +10.1% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -50.7% | -65.1% | -83.5% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +18.2% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.2% | +94.3% | -56.7% | -4.8% |
Evenly matched — SBET and SOFI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SBET leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | SOFISoFi Technologies… | MARAMarathon Digital … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $60M | $1.5B | $20.4B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52M | $1.4B | $17.3B | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.75x | -1.01x | 41.03x | -3.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.11x | 26.45x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 22.75x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.87x | 52.23x | 4.28x | 5.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 0.61x | 1.91x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
SBET leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOFI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOFI delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-88 for FLD. SOFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLD scores 4/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | SOFISoFi Technologies… | MARAMarathon Digital … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.5% | -49.5% | +5.9% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.2% | -49.3% | +1.1% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -68.9% | -35.2% | +3.6% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.6% | -46.3% | +1.2% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.17x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$29M | -$3.1B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $29M | $4.9B | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $1.8B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.69x | — | 0.45x | 4.73x |
SOFI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOFI five years ago would be worth $9,691 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $112 for SBET. Over the past 12 months, SBET leads with a +127.8% total return vs FLD's -69.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOFI at 43.0% vs FLD's -51.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | SOFISoFi Technologies… | MARAMarathon Digital … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.4% | -23.1% | -41.7% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -69.9% | +127.8% | +23.0% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -81.4% | +192.5% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -98.9% | -3.1% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -98.4% | +52.7% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.8% | -42.9% | +43.0% | +10.8% |
SOFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLD and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLD is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBET's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs SBET's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | SOFISoFi Technologies… | MARAMarathon Digital … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 3.41x | 2.54x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.53 | $124.12 | $32.73 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $2.41 | $12.56 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.2% | +6.0% | +48.9% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 58.6 | 41.9 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 6.9M | 65.8M | 47.6M |
Evenly matched — FLD and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SBET as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 128.2% upside for SBET (target: $17) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16).
| Metric | FLDFold Holdings Inc | SBETSharpLink Gaming … | SOFISoFi Technologies… | MARAMarathon Digital … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $20.89 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 27 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% | +0.3% | +1.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SOFI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SBET leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallSoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FLD vs SBET vs SOFI vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLD or SBET or SOFI or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
(SBET) is the stronger pick with 666. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 28. 8% for SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI). SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) offers the better valuation at 41. 0x trailing P/E (26. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLD or SBET or SOFI or MARA?
On forward P/E, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLD or SBET or SOFI or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) delivered a total return of -3. 1%, compared to -98. 9% for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOFI returned +52. 7% versus SBET's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLD or SBET or SOFI or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
55β versus SharpLink Gaming Ltd. 's 3. 41β — meaning SBET is approximately 120% more volatile than FLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLD or SBET or SOFI or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
(SBET) is pulling ahead at 666. 0% versus 28. 8% for SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SharpLink Gaming Ltd. grew EPS 53. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1275. 0% for Fold Holdings Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLD or SBET or SOFI or MARA?
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus -26. 2% for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOFI leads at 11. 0% versus -1999. 5% for SBET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBET leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLD or SBET or SOFI or MARA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
(SBET) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for SoFi Technologies, Inc. — 20. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBET: 128. 2% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLD or SBET or SOFI or MARA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FLD or SBET or SOFI or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLD: -88. 8%, SBET: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLD and SBET and SOFI and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (FLD (Financial Services) and SBET (Consumer Cyclical) and SOFI (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SBET is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.