Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLG vs BANC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLG
Flagstar Financial, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.94B
5Y Perf.-52.6%
BANC
Banc of California, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.96B
5Y Perf.+75.1%

FLG vs BANC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLG logoFLG
BANC logoBANC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$5.94B$2.96B
Revenue (TTM)$4.70B$1.81B
Net Income (TTM)$-177M$229M
Gross Margin37.6%58.7%
Operating Margin-4.2%18.0%
Forward P/E31.7x11.3x
Total Debt$12.18B$3.02B
Cash & Equiv.$553M$2.31B

FLG vs BANCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLG
BANC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Flagstar Financial,… (FLG)10047.4-52.6%
Banc of California,… (BANC)100175.1+75.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLG vs BANC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BANC leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Flagstar Financial, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLG
Flagstar Financial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FLG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 0.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 0.54x
  • Beta 1.01, yield 0.3%, current ratio 0.54x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BANC
Banc of California, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BANC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -3.3%, EPS growth 126.9%
  • 18.6% 10Y total return vs FLG's -32.1%
  • NIM 2.8% vs FLG's 2.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBANC logoBANC-3.3% NII/revenue growth vs FLG's -26.5%
ValueBANC logoBANCLower P/E (11.3x vs 31.7x)
Quality / MarginsBANC logoBANCEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs FLG's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyFLG logoFLGBeta 1.01 vs BANC's 1.34
DividendsBANC logoBANC2.1% yield, vs FLG's 0.3%
Momentum (1Y)BANC logoBANC+43.6% vs FLG's +18.8%
Efficiency (ROA)BANC logoBANCEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs FLG's 0.4%

FLG vs BANC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLGFlagstar Financial, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BANCBanc of California, Inc.
FY 2025
Noninterest Income
50.0%$39M
Service Charges On Deposit Accounts
24.7%$19M
Other Commissions And Fees
24.6%$19M
Other
0.7%$560,000

FLG vs BANC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBANCLAGGINGFLG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BANC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

FLG is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 2.6x BANC's $1.8B. BANC is the more profitable business, keeping 12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLG's -3.8%.

MetricFLG logoFLGFlagstar Financia…BANC logoBANCBanc of Californi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.7B$1.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$85M$397M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$177M$229M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$237M$235M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.6%+58.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.2%+18.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.8%+12.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.8%+13.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+108.5%+50.0%
BANC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FLG leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricFLG logoFLGFlagstar Financia…BANC logoBANCBanc of Californi…
Market CapShares × price$5.9B$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$17.6B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-28.02x16.25x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.68x11.32x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.23x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.27x1.63x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.73x0.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.60x
FLG leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BANC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

BANC delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FLG. BANC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLG's 1.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BANC scores 7/9 vs FLG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFLG logoFLGFlagstar Financia…BANC logoBANCBanc of Californi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.2%+6.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.2%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.7%+3.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.5%+5.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.50x0.85x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$11.6B$709M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$553M$2.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$12.2B$3.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.07x0.47x
BANC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BANC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BANC five years ago would be worth $11,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,515 for FLG. Over the past 12 months, BANC leads with a +43.6% total return vs FLG's +18.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BANC at 25.1% vs FLG's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLG logoFLGFlagstar Financia…BANC logoBANCBanc of Californi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+13.9%-0.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.8%+43.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-48.0%+95.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.8%+15.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.1%+18.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.6%+25.1%
BANC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FLG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FLG is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BANC's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLG currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs BANC's 88.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFLG logoFLGFlagstar Financia…BANC logoBANCBanc of Californi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.01x1.34x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.90$21.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.38$13.24
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.9%+88.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.263.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.7M2.8M
FLG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BANC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates FLG as "Buy" and BANC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for FLG (target: $16) vs -8.7% for BANC (target: $18). For income investors, BANC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.08% vs FLG's 0.25%.

MetricFLG logoFLGFlagstar Financia…BANC logoBANCBanc of Californi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.58$17.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1427
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+2.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04$0.40
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.3%
BANC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BANC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallBanc of California, Inc. (BANC)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLG vs BANC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLG or BANC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Banc of California, Inc.

(BANC) is the stronger pick with -3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 5% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG). Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLG or BANC?

On forward P/E, Banc of California, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 11. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLG or BANC?

Over the past 5 years, Banc of California, Inc.

(BANC) delivered a total return of +15. 0%, compared to -44. 8% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANC returned +18. 6% versus FLG's -32. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLG or BANC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flagstar Financial, Inc.

(FLG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Banc of California, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning BANC is approximately 33% more volatile than FLG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 150% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLG or BANC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Banc of California, Inc.

(BANC) is pulling ahead at -3. 3% versus -26. 5% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banc of California, Inc. grew EPS 126. 9% year-over-year, compared to 85. 4% for Flagstar Financial, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLG or BANC?

Banc of California, Inc.

(BANC) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus -3. 8% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BANC leads at 18. 0% versus -4. 2% for FLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANC leads at 58. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLG or BANC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Banc of California, Inc.

(BANC) trades at 11. 3x forward P/E versus 31. 7x for Flagstar Financial, Inc. — 20. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLG: 9. 0% to $15. 58.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLG or BANC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 3% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG).

09

Is FLG or BANC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Banc of California, Inc.

(BANC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANC: +18. 6%, FLG: -32. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLG and BANC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BANC is a small-cap deep-value stock. BANC pays a dividend while FLG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FLG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BANC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FLG and BANC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FLG: -26.5% · BANC: -3.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.