Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLG vs BANC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FLG vs BANC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $5.94B | $2.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.70B | $1.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-177M | $229M |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 58.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.2% | 18.0% |
| Forward P/E | 31.7x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $12.18B | $3.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $553M | $2.31B |
FLG vs BANC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagstar Financial,… (FLG) | 100 | 47.4 | -52.6% |
| Banc of California,… (BANC) | 100 | 175.1 | +75.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLG vs BANC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 0.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 0.54x
- Beta 1.01, yield 0.3%, current ratio 0.54x
BANC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -3.3%, EPS growth 126.9%
- 18.6% 10Y total return vs FLG's -32.1%
- NIM 2.8% vs FLG's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.3% NII/revenue growth vs FLG's -26.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 31.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FLG's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs BANC's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, vs FLG's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.6% vs FLG's +18.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FLG's 0.4% |
FLG vs BANC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLG vs BANC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BANC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLG is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 2.6x BANC's $1.8B. BANC is the more profitable business, keeping 12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLG's -3.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$85M | $397M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$177M | $229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$237M | $235M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +58.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +18.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +12.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.8% | +13.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.5% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FLG leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.9B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.6B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.02x | 16.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.68x | 11.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 1.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BANC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BANC delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FLG. BANC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLG's 1.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BANC scores 7/9 vs FLG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.50x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11.6B | $709M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $553M | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.2B | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.07x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BANC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANC five years ago would be worth $11,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,515 for FLG. Over the past 12 months, BANC leads with a +43.6% total return vs FLG's +18.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BANC at 25.1% vs FLG's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.9% | -0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.8% | +43.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.0% | +95.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | +15.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | +18.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.6% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
FLG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLG is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BANC's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLG currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs BANC's 88.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.90 | $21.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.38 | $13.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +88.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 63.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
BANC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLG as "Buy" and BANC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for FLG (target: $16) vs -8.7% for BANC (target: $18). For income investors, BANC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.08% vs FLG's 0.25%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.58 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.3% |
BANC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
FLG vs BANC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLG or BANC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Banc of California, Inc.
(BANC) is the stronger pick with -3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 5% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG). Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLG or BANC?
On forward P/E, Banc of California, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLG or BANC?
Over the past 5 years, Banc of California, Inc.
(BANC) delivered a total return of +15. 0%, compared to -44. 8% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANC returned +18. 6% versus FLG's -32. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLG or BANC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flagstar Financial, Inc.
(FLG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Banc of California, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning BANC is approximately 33% more volatile than FLG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 150% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLG or BANC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Banc of California, Inc.
(BANC) is pulling ahead at -3. 3% versus -26. 5% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banc of California, Inc. grew EPS 126. 9% year-over-year, compared to 85. 4% for Flagstar Financial, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLG or BANC?
Banc of California, Inc.
(BANC) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus -3. 8% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BANC leads at 18. 0% versus -4. 2% for FLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANC leads at 58. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLG or BANC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Banc of California, Inc.
(BANC) trades at 11. 3x forward P/E versus 31. 7x for Flagstar Financial, Inc. — 20. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLG: 9. 0% to $15. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLG or BANC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 3% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG).
09Is FLG or BANC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banc of California, Inc.
(BANC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANC: +18. 6%, FLG: -32. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLG and BANC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BANC is a small-cap deep-value stock. BANC pays a dividend while FLG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.