Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLNT vs ACMR vs PERI vs CDLX vs MGNI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLNT
Fluent, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$82M
5Y Perf.-76.9%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+197.0%
PERI
Perion Network Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$483M
5Y Perf.+95.6%
CDLX
Cardlytics, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$43M
5Y Perf.-98.9%
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.01B
5Y Perf.+123.3%

FLNT vs ACMR vs PERI vs CDLX vs MGNI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLNT logoFLNT
ACMR logoACMR
PERI logoPERI
CDLX logoCDLX
MGNI logoMGNI
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesSemiconductorsInternet Content & InformationAdvertising AgenciesAdvertising Agencies
Market Cap$82M$3.92B$483M$43M$2.01B
Revenue (TTM)$209M$901M$440M$206M$723M
Net Income (TTM)$-27M$94M$-8M$-95M$159M
Gross Margin24.5%44.4%33.3%38.9%63.4%
Operating Margin-9.7%12.1%-3.4%-22.8%14.8%
Forward P/E29.7x8.9x13.4x
Total Debt$38M$303M$42M$215M$279M
Cash & Equiv.$13M$766M$91M$49M$553M

FLNT vs ACMR vs PERI vs CDLX vs MGNILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLNT
ACMR
PERI
CDLX
MGNI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Fluent, Inc. (FLNT)10023.1-76.9%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100297.0+197.0%
Perion Network Ltd. (PERI)100195.6+95.6%
Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX)1001.1-98.9%
Magnite, Inc. (MGNI)100223.3+123.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLNT vs ACMR vs PERI vs CDLX vs MGNI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACMR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. Perion Network Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. MGNI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FLNT
Fluent, Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

FLNT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs PERI's 139.6%
  • 15.2% revenue growth vs FLNT's -18.0%
  • 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +195.6% vs CDLX's -63.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
PERI
Perion Network Ltd.
The Income Pick

PERI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 2.76x
  • Beta 0.94, current ratio 2.76x
  • Lower P/E (8.9x vs 13.4x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CDLX
Cardlytics, Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CDLX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.
The Growth Play

MGNI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 493.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
  • 22.0% margin vs CDLX's -46.0%
  • 5.3% ROA vs FLNT's -34.3%, ROIC 9.5% vs -31.8%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACMR logoACMR15.2% revenue growth vs FLNT's -18.0%
ValuePERI logoPERILower P/E (8.9x vs 13.4x)
Quality / MarginsMGNI logoMGNI22.0% margin vs CDLX's -46.0%
Stability / SafetyPERI logoPERIBeta 0.94 vs ACMR's 3.24, lower leverage
DividendsACMR logoACMR0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ACMR logoACMR+195.6% vs CDLX's -63.8%
Efficiency (ROA)MGNI logoMGNI5.3% ROA vs FLNT's -34.3%, ROIC 9.5% vs -31.8%

FLNT vs ACMR vs PERI vs CDLX vs MGNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLNTFluent, Inc.
FY 2024
Fluent Segment
100.0%$241M
ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
PERIPerion Network Ltd.
FY 2024
Display and Social Advertising
67.3%$336M
Search Advertising and other
32.7%$163M
CDLXCardlytics, Inc.
FY 2025
Cost per Redemption
50.9%$129M
Cost per Served Sales
31.1%$79M
Bridg Subscription Revenue
8.2%$21M
Bridg Total Revenue
8.2%$21M
Cost Other
1.6%$4M
MGNIMagnite, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FLNT vs ACMR vs PERI vs CDLX vs MGNI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACMRLAGGINGCDLX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MGNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $901M annually — 4.4x CDLX's $206M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDLX's -46.0%. On growth, ACMR holds the edge at +9.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$209M$901M$440M$206M$723M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M$126M$3M-$23M$145M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$27M$94M-$8M-$95M$159M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M-$69M$39M$6M$44M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.5%+44.4%+33.3%+38.9%+63.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.7%+12.1%-3.4%-22.8%+14.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.0%+10.4%-1.8%-46.0%+22.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.4%-7.6%+8.9%+2.9%+6.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.5%+9.4%+5.8%-44.6%+5.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+31.6%-76.1%+72.7%+3.8%+142.9%
MGNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PERI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 66% valuation discount to ACMR's 43.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PERI's 106.0x.

MetricFLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$82M$3.9B$483M$43M$2.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$107M$3.5B$434M$210M$1.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.64x43.21x-56.74x-0.40x14.74x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.68x8.89x13.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.49x106.04x11.43x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.39x4.35x1.10x0.18x2.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.95x2.06x0.67x2.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.66x4.89x12.11x
PERI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MGNI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-9 for CDLX. PERI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNT's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDLX scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-134.2%+6.1%-1.2%-8.7%+18.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-34.3%+3.9%-0.9%-31.5%+5.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-31.8%+7.0%-1.7%-18.3%+9.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-76.6%+6.6%-1.8%-20.9%+7.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–932366
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.07x0.16x0.06x0.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$25M-$463M-$49M$167M-$275M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$13M$766M$91M$49M$553M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$38M$303M$42M$215M$279M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.74x20.44x-14.37x4.03x
MGNI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for CDLX. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +195.6% total return vs CDLX's -63.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs CDLX's -48.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.5%+31.9%+15.3%-30.2%-12.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+19.9%+195.6%+16.9%-63.8%+12.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.8%+487.9%-68.0%-86.5%+58.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.6%+133.4%-37.2%-99.2%-60.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.7%+3065.8%+139.6%-94.2%-4.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.6%+80.5%-31.6%-48.8%+16.7%
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PERI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PERI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PERI currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs CDLX's 23.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.14x3.24x0.94x3.18x1.63x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.15$71.65$11.79$3.28$26.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.50$19.26$8.07$0.66$10.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+66.7%+82.6%+91.4%+23.8%+52.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.960.759.136.655.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded33K1.2M321K1.2M2.1M
PERI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: FLNT as "Hold", ACMR as "Buy", PERI as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.9% upside for PERI (target: $14) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.50$40.00$14.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2101331
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%+14.7%0.0%+2.3%
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MGNI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PERI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLNT vs ACMR vs PERI vs CDLX vs MGNI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLNT or ACMR or PERI or CDLX or MGNI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 0% for Fluent, Inc. (FLNT). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLNT or ACMR or PERI or CDLX or MGNI?

On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus ACM Research, Inc. at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, Perion Network Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLNT or ACMR or PERI or CDLX or MGNI?

Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -99. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus CDLX's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLNT or ACMR or PERI or CDLX or MGNI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perion Network Ltd.

(PERI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 243% more volatile than PERI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 2% for Fluent, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLNT or ACMR or PERI or CDLX or MGNI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -18. 0% for Fluent, Inc. (FLNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -176. 0% for Perion Network Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLNT or ACMR or PERI or CDLX or MGNI?

Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -44. 4% for Cardlytics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGNI leads at 13. 7% versus -20. 2% for CDLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGNI leads at 62. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLNT or ACMR or PERI or CDLX or MGNI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Perion Network Ltd.

(PERI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 29. 7x for ACM Research, Inc. — 20. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PERI: 29. 9% to $14. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLNT or ACMR or PERI or CDLX or MGNI?

In this comparison, ACMR (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. FLNT, PERI, CDLX, MGNI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FLNT or ACMR or PERI or CDLX or MGNI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Perion Network Ltd.

(PERI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), +139. 6% 10Y return). Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PERI: +139. 6%, CDLX: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLNT and ACMR and PERI and CDLX and MGNI?

These companies operate in different sectors (FLNT (Communication Services) and ACMR (Technology) and PERI (Communication Services) and CDLX (Communication Services) and MGNI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FLNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FLNT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PERI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGNI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FLNT and ACMR and PERI and CDLX and MGNI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FLNT: -5.5% · ACMR: 9.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.